[Bug 1212653] Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native ZooKeeper client for Go

2015-07-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|golang-github-samuel-go-zoo |golang-github-samuel-go-zoo
   |keeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.fc2 |keeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.el6
   |2   |



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.el6 has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212653] Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native ZooKeeper client for Go

2015-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||golang-github-samuel-go-zoo
   ||keeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.fc2
   ||1
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-06-29 20:07:05



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.fc21 has been pushed to the
Fedora 21 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212653] Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native ZooKeeper client for Go

2015-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|golang-github-samuel-go-zoo |golang-github-samuel-go-zoo
   |keeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.fc2 |keeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.fc2
   |1   |2



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.fc22 has been pushed to the
Fedora 22 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212653] Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native ZooKeeper client for Go

2015-06-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.fc22 has been pushed to the
Fedora 22 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212653] Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native ZooKeeper client for Go

2015-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212653] Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native ZooKeeper client for Go

2015-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.fc22 has been submitted as
an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.fc22

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212653] Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native ZooKeeper client for Go

2015-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.fc21 has been submitted as
an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.fc21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212653] Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native ZooKeeper client for Go

2015-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.el6 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper-0-0.1.gitd0e0d8e.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212653] Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native ZooKeeper client for Go

2015-06-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212653] Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native ZooKeeper client for Go

2015-06-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212653] Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native ZooKeeper client for Go

2015-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653

Marek Skalický mskal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mskal...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mskal...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212653] Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native ZooKeeper client for Go

2015-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653

Marek Skalický mskal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Marek Skalický mskal...@redhat.com ---
Specfile conforms to current Go packaging draft [1].

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go


Should items:
- latest version is not packed
- %check is not present and all tests pass


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: Unknown or generated. 18 files have unknown license. Detailed
 output of licensecheck in /home/mskalick/reviews/1212653-golang-
 github-samuel-go-zookeeper/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/share/licenses
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src,
 /usr/share/licenses, /usr/share/gocode,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can 

[Bug 1212653] Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native ZooKeeper client for Go

2015-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653

Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper
Short Description: Native ZooKeeper client for Go
Upstream URL: https://github.com/samuel/go-zookeeper
Owners: jchaloup
Branches: f22 f21 el6
InitialCC: golang-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212653] Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native ZooKeeper client for Go

2015-04-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653

Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1211517




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
[Bug 1211517] Review Request: docker-swarm - Docker-native clustering
system
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review