[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- CPUFreqUtility-1.4.4-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-12-05 20:24:23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- CPUFreqUtility-1.4.4-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- CPUFreqUtility-1.4.4-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update CPUFreqUtility' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-264ed0268f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- CPUFreqUtility-1.4.4-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update CPUFreqUtility' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1ade8e5763 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- CPUFreqUtility-1.4.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1ade8e5763 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- CPUFreqUtility-1.4.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1ade8e5763 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|https://bugzilla.redhat.com | |/show_bug.cgi?id=1270873| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- CPUFreqUtility-1.4.3-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update CPUFreqUtility' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-03307103e4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- CPUFreqUtility-1.4.3-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update CPUFreqUtility' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3a5743b06f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- CPUFreqUtility-1.4.3-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3a5743b06f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=1270873 --- Comment #18 from Raphael Groner --- Interested in doing a review swap with your own projects? Take a look into bug #1270873. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|projects...@smart.ms Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Raphael Groner --- APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Fl@sh changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #16 from Fl@sh --- I not need sponsor ;) My FAS is f1ash (with digit 1). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #15 from Raphael Groner --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #8) > You should activate your FAS: > [20:25:11] fasinfo flash > [20:25:13] User: flash, Name: Jose J. Colmenares S., email: > $address, Creation: 2009-05-30, IRC Nick: None, Timezone: UTC, Locale: C, > GPG key ID: None, Status: inactive > [20:25:17] Approved Groups: cla_fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #14 from Raphael Groner --- Package review is approvable now. You need a sponsor to get approved as a package maintainer. Please follow the guidelines in doing some other review comments or become a co-maintainer of an existing package (both are the common ways to get sponsored). https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #13 from Fl@sh --- Fixed: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/F1ash/CPUFreqUtility/master/CPUFreqUtility.spec SRPM URL: https://f1ash.fedorapeople.org/CPUFreqUtility/CPUFreqUtility-1.4.3-2.fc22.R.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- f1ash's scratch build of CPUFreqUtility-1.4.3-2.fc22.R.src.rpm for f23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11412516 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444
--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file COPYING is marked as %doc instead of %license
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
- License tag is invalid, use GPLv2+ instead of GPL2+
- Add Requires: dbus systemd
- Add other missing folders ownership into %files
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[?]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 27 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/builder/fedora-
review/CPUFreqUtility/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /etc/dbus-1/system.d
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/polkit-1/actions,
/usr/share/dbus-1/system-services, /usr/share/dbus-1, /etc/dbus-1,
/etc/dbus-1/system.d, /usr/share/polkit-1
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[?]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[?]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Fully versioned dependency
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- raphgro's scratch build of CPUFreqUtility-1.4.3-1.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410359 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner --- The Spec URL does not return raw content. You may use instead: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/F1ash/CPUFreqUtility/master/CPUFreqUtility.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner --- You should activate your FAS: [20:25:11] fasinfo flash [20:25:13] User: flash, Name: Jose J. Colmenares S., email: $address, Creation: 2009-05-30, IRC Nick: None, Timezone: UTC, Locale: C, GPG key ID: None, Status: inactive [20:25:17] Approved Groups: cla_fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Fl@sh changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(kaperang07@gmail. | |com)| --- Comment #7 from Fl@sh --- Newest: Spec URL: https://github.com/F1ash/CPUFreqUtility/blob/master/CPUFreqUtility.spec SRPM URL: https://f1ash.fedorapeople.org/CPUFreqUtility/CPUFreqUtility-1.4.3-1.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|https://bugzilla.redhat.com | |/show_bug.cgi?id=1189269, | |https://bugzilla.redhat.com | |/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911, | |https://bugzilla.redhat.com | |/show_bug.cgi?id=1197333| Flags||needinfo?(kaperang07@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner --- Use %global instead of %define . https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define Use %license COPYING instead of %doc . https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text You can remove the Group: tag, it's obsolete. I fail to validate the upstream URL, is this project dead, gone or renamed somehow? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=1189269, ||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911, ||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=1197333 --- Comment #5 from Raphael Groner --- Hi, are you interested in a review swap? If yes, I could here do the reviewer job. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #4 from Fl@sh --- SRPM URL: https://f1ash.fedorapeople.org/CPUFreqUtility/CPUFreqUtility-1.4.3-1.fc22.src.rpm (newest version) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #3 from Fl@sh --- SRPM URL: https://f1ash.fedorapeople.org/CPUFreqUtility/CPUFreqUtility-1.2.2-1.fc22.src.rpm (newest version) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Fl@sh changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||trivial -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Fl@sh changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |kf5-cpufrequtility - KF5|CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU |CPU Frequence utility |Frequence utility --- Comment #2 from Fl@sh --- Spec URL: https://github.com/F1ash/CPUFreqUtility/blob/master/CPUFreqUtility.spec SRPM URL: https://f1ash.fedorapeople.org/CPUFreqUtility/CPUFreqUtility-1.1.2-2.fc22.src.rpm Description: KDE Utility is managed the CPU frequency governors and the min\max parameters of frequency. Fedora Account System Username: f1ash Successfull builds: https://f1ash.fedorapeople.org/CPUFreqUtility/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
