[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nfft-3.3.0-2.fc21 |nfft-3.3.0-2.el7 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nfft-3.3.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nfft-3.3.0-2.fc22 |nfft-3.3.0-2.fc21 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nfft-3.3.0-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||nfft-3.3.0-2.fc22 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-07-10 15:09:31 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nfft-3.3.0-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nfft-3.3.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nfft-3.3.0-2.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nfft-3.3.0-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nfft-3.3.0-2.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nfft-3.3.0-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nfft-3.3.0-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||d...@der-flo.net Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@der-flo.net Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 --- Comment #3 from Christian Dersch lupi...@mailbox.org --- Koji builds: Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10213053 F21: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10213060 F22: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10213064 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 --- Comment #2 from Christian Dersch lupi...@mailbox.org --- Spec URL: https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/review/nfft.spec SRPM URL: https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/review/nfft-3.3.0-2.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 --- Comment #1 from Christian Dersch lupi...@mailbox.org --- Spec URL: https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/review/nfft.spec ARPM URL: https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/review/nfft-3.3.0-2.fc21.src.rpm Fixed documentation packaging -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net --- Hi Christian It looks good :) Cheers, Florian Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: MIT/X11 (BSD like), GPL (v2 or later), Unknown or generated. 9 files have unknown license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in nfft-doc [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 --- Comment #5 from Christian Dersch lupi...@mailbox.org --- Thank you very much for the fast review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 Christian Dersch lupi...@mailbox.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Christian Dersch lupi...@mailbox.org --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nfft Short Description: Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform Upstream URL: https://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~potts/nfft/ Owners: lupinix Branches: f21 f22 epel7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1235747] Review Request: nfft - Nonequispaced fast Fourier transform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235747 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nfft-3.3.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review