[Bug 1247795] Review Request: execstack - Utility to set/clear/query executable stack bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247795 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||execstack-0.5.0-8.fc24 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-08-04 11:54:51 --- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Built for rawhide and F23, submitted as an update and buildroot override for F23. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247795] Review Request: execstack - Utility to set/clear/query executable stack bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247795 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247795] Review Request: execstack - Utility to set/clear/query executable stack bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247795 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247795] Review Request: execstack - Utility to set/clear/query executable stack bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247795
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #4)
> 1. Please drop Requires: glibc >= 2.2.4-18 (EL-5 has glibc-2.5) and reformat
> the rest of the (Build)Requires one per-line and sort alphabetically.
Done. I also dropped all Requires. They don't seem necessary.
> 2. Please add a comment explaining this in %build:
> sed -i -e '/^prelink_LDADD/s/$/ -lpthread/' src/Makefile.{am,in}
This wasn't neceessary either, dropped.
> 3. Please add -p to install commands:
> install -D src/execstack %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/execstack
> install -Dm0644 doc/execstack.8 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man8/execstack.8
Done.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247795] Review Request: execstack - Utility to set/clear/query executable stack bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247795 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Thanks you for the review. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: execstack Short Description: Utility to set/clear/query executable stack bit Upstream URL: https://sourceware.org/svn/prelink/trunk/ Owners: zbyszek Branches: f23 InitialCC: jakub -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247795] Review Request: execstack - Utility to set/clear/query executable stack bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247795
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3)
> Thanks for taking this.
Thanks for resurrecting execstack. Several of my packages depend on it at build
time.
> I removed both ExclusiveArch and Group. EA was taken from the prelink
> package, but it looks like it might not be needed at all. The only
> architecture that is still present in Fedora, and was not on this list, is
> MIPS.
>
> spec and srpm updated in place.
Great, the package is APPROVED, though I do have a couple more nitpicks you can
fix when importing:
1. Please drop Requires: glibc >= 2.2.4-18 (EL-5 has glibc-2.5) and reformat
the rest of the (Build)Requires one per-line and sort alphabetically.
2. Please add a comment explaining this in %build:
sed -i -e '/^prelink_LDADD/s/$/ -lpthread/' src/Makefile.{am,in}
3. Please add -p to install commands:
install -D src/execstack %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/execstack
install -Dm0644 doc/execstack.8 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man8/execstack.8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247795] Review Request: execstack - Utility to set/clear/query executable stack bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247795 --- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Thanks for taking this. I removed both ExclusiveArch and Group. EA was taken from the prelink package, but it looks like it might not be needed at all. The only architecture that is still present in Fedora, and was not on this list, is MIPS. spec and srpm updated in place. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247795] Review Request: execstack - Utility to set/clear/query executable stack bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247795
--- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Things to fix:
1. Please justify
# For now
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} alpha sparc sparcv9 sparc64 s390 s390x x86_64 ppc ppc64
%{arm}
2. Please drop
Group: System Environment/Base
Otherwise it looks fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247795] Review Request: execstack - Utility to set/clear/query executable stack bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247795
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|domi...@greysector.net
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[!]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 5 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
Note: %define requiring justification: %define date 20131005
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %c
[Bug 1247795] Review Request: execstack - Utility to set/clear/query executable stack bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247795 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1248034 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248034 [Bug 1248034] gromacs: FTBFS in rawhide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247795] Review Request: execstack - Utility to set/clear/query executable stack bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247795 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1248033 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248033 [Bug 1248033] pypy3: FTBFS in rawhide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247795] Review Request: execstack - Utility to set/clear/query executable stack bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247795 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1239815 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239815 [Bug 1239815] pypy: FTBFS in rawhide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
