[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-gabbi-1.19.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-05-16 12:25:45



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-gabbi-1.19.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6323cc7eb1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-gabbi-1.19.0-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6323cc7eb1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

Javier Peña  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #17 from Javier Peña  ---
Everything looks ok now, thanks!

fedora-review is complaining that the package source cannot be downloaded from
the location specified in Source0, not sure if that is an issue in pyp2rpm or
something else.

The package is APPROVED, please go ahead and submit the SCM request.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache
 (v2.0)". 15 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /tmp/1252812-python-gabbi/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages,
 /usr/lib/python3.5
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.5/site-
 packages, /usr/lib/python3.5
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
 Note: Could not download Source0:
 https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/g/gabbi/gabbi-1.19.0.tar.gz
 See: 

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

Javier Peña  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|rybr...@redhat.com  |jp...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812



--- Comment #16 from Chandan Kumar  ---
Hello,

Here is the updated
SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi.spec
SRPM : https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi-1.19.0-1.fc23.src.rpm

and koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13982971

Thanks,

Chandan Kumar

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812



--- Comment #15 from Alfredo Moralejo  ---

The spec looks good to me now. 

Best regards,

Alfredo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812



--- Comment #14 from Chandan Kumar  ---
Hello Alfredo,

Thanks for the review.

Here is the updated
SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi.spec
SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi-1.17.5-1.fc23.src.rpm

and koji build scratch :
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13949960

Thanks,

Chandan Kumar

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812



--- Comment #13 from Alfredo Moralejo  ---
Hi Chandan,

Some comments:

- About manpage, great!!
- About tests in %checks, i've seen some tests are failing because of
(https://github.com/cdent/gabbi/issues/133), so i think it's ok to leave the ||

About dependencies, I think it should have a Requires on python3-urllib3.

Best regards,

Alfredo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812



--- Comment #12 from Chandan Kumar  ---
Hello Alfredo,

Thanks for reviewing it.
* manpage added
* %checks are included
Here is the updated 
SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi.spec
SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi-1.17.5-3.fc23.src.rpm

and Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13944220

Thanks,

Chandan Kumar

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

Alfredo Moralejo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||amora...@redhat.com



--- Comment #11 from Alfredo Moralejo  ---
Hi Chandan,

Another couple of comments:

- This package provides an executable file so it should provide a man page for
it. Upstream package provides a man page for "gabbi" which includes help for
running gabbi-run so i think it'd be nice to include it. 

- Would it be possible to add tests execution in %check?

Best regards,

Alfredo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812



--- Comment #10 from Chandan Kumar  ---
Hello Jpena,

Thanks for reviewing it.
Here is the updated
SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi.spec
SRPM : https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi-1.17.5-2.fc23.src.rpm

and koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13934602

Thanks,

Chandan Kumar

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

Javier Peña  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jp...@redhat.com



--- Comment #9 from Javier Peña  ---
Hi Chandan,

The spec has an issue with the "%{_bindir}/gabbi-run" executable, which is
included in both the python2 and python3 subpackages, creating issues (besides
the conflict, the python2 subpkg requires python3 when built).

You may want to apply a similar fix to the one in
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python-reno.git/tree/python-reno.spec .

Also, any reason to exclude gabbits_intercept? I don't see anything in the spec
file.

Other than that, the spec looks good to me.

Javier

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

Chandan Kumar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(rybr...@redhat.co |
   |m)  |



--- Comment #8 from Chandan Kumar  ---
Hello,

Here is the updated
SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi.spec
SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi-1.17.5-1.fc23.src.rpm

and koji Build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13932412

Thanks,

Chandan Kumar

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

Chandan Kumar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(rybr...@redhat.co
   ||m)



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

Chandan Kumar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||chkumar...@gmail.com
  Flags||needinfo?(rybr...@redhat.co
   ||m)



--- Comment #5 from Chandan Kumar  ---
Hello Ryan,

Sorry for the late reply.

Here is the updated
SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi.spec
SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi-1.7.0-1.fc22.src.rpm

Thanks,

Chandan Kumar

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

Ryan Brown  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(rybr...@redhat.co |
   |m)  |



--- Comment #6 from Ryan Brown  ---

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache
 (v2.0)". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck
 in /tmp/review/python-gabbi/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[-]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.

There are no "Requires:" for any of the packages, which is likely a mistake as
I know gabbi needs jsonpath. wsgi_intercept, etc to run. Please add runtime
deps.

[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).

See above

[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
 python2-gabbi , python3-gabbi , python-gabbi-doc
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Description and summary sections in 

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

Ryan Brown  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rybr...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812



--- Comment #4 from Ryan Brown  ---
Hi, here's an updated spec/srpm:

http://rsb.io/pkg/python-gabbi.spec
http://rsb.io/pkg/python-gabbi-1.6.1-1.fc22.src.rpm

I don't think the PBR mechanism needs disabling, but I'm not certain. I know
you can add a patch that disables PBR entirely as a runtime dep, but I don't
think it's required.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812



--- Comment #3 from bigswitch  ---
1. URL should point to package pypi page
2. Do you need to disable pbr version determination mechanism on build? For
example,
https://github.com/openstack-packages/neutron/blob/4bc2d731766a50fb0d6733bbd8e0a2bde1f4a187/openstack-neutron.spec#L443

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

bigswitch rhosp-bugs-inter...@bigswitch.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rhosp-bugs-internal@bigswit
   ||ch.com



--- Comment #2 from bigswitch rhosp-bugs-inter...@bigswitch.com ---
Hi Chandan,

Latest version on pypi is 1.5.1. The spec file should be pointing to that
version, right?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mru...@redhat.com



--- Comment #1 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Thank you for your review request. Please add a python3 package. Upstream also
includes tests, please execute them as well during build.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

Chandan Kumar chku...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1243533
   ||(RDO-LIBERTY-REVIEWS)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243533
[Bug 1243533] (RDO) Tracker: Review requests for new RDO Liberty packages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review