[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-02-29 00:25:18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- restsharp-105.2.3-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- restsharp-105.2.3-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eedc45335e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- restsharp-105.2.3-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eedc45335e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- restsharp-105.2.3-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-01a328bcee -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- restsharp-105.2.3-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-01a328bcee -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/restsharp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Alias|restsharp | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST --- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner --- Thanks for your review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Christian Dersch ---
Package looks fine :) Approved!
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated",
"*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 108 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/review/1270776-restsharp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
==> Patches are Fedora specific for unbundling etc.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
==> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12858849
[x]: %check is present and all tests
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- raphgro's scratch build of restsharp-105.2.3-3.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12858849 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 --- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner --- Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/restsharp.spec SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/restsharp-105.2.3-3.fc23.src.rpm Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12858849 %changelog * Thu Feb 04 2016 Raphael Groner - 105.2.3-3 - split devel subpackage, add mono as requirement in pkgconfig - fix folder ownership of _monodir/name - add license breakdown -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 --- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- raphgro's scratch build of restsharp-105.2.3-3.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12857375 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 Christian Dersch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lupi...@mailbox.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lupi...@mailbox.org --- Comment #5 from Christian Dersch --- Taken TODO I already recognized: Please move restsharp.pc to a -devel subpackage as required by Guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono?rd=Packaging/Mono#-devel_packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- raphgro's scratch build of restsharp-105.2.3-2.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11444702 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 --- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner --- Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/restsharp.spec SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/restsharp-105.2.3-2.fc23.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Oct 14 2015 Raphael Groner <> - 105.2.3-2 - use patches for csproj preparation - unbundle + enable nunit Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11444702 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- raphgro's scratch build of restsharp-105.2.3-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11413777 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270776] Review Request: restsharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270776 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1159091 (openra) Alias||restsharp --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- error CS0246: The type or namespace name `NUnit' could not be found. Are you missing an assembly reference? => Disabled %check for now cause no idea why it doesn't work. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091 [Bug 1159091] Review Request: openra - Libre/Free Real Time Strategy project that recreates the famous Command & Conquer titles -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
