[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 Carl George changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED Last Closed||2019-02-25 16:49:33 --- Comment #19 from Carl George --- This appears to have stalled out. I'm going to close this to get it off the tracker [0], but feel free to re-open it if/when you're able to pick it back up. [0]: https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 --- Comment #18 from Sergio Monteiro Basto--- build fails [1] in F24 and rawhide , but builds on F23 !?! [1] [100%] Building manpage documentation cd /builddir/build/BUILD/rpg-rpg-0.0.5-1/doc && PYTHONPATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/rpg-rpg-0.0.5-1 sphinx-build-3 -b man /builddir/build/BUILD/rpg-rpg-0.0.5-1/doc /builddir/build/BUILD/rpg-rpg-0.0.5-1/doc Error: source directory and destination directory are same. doc/CMakeFiles/doc-man.dir/build.make:60: recipe for target 'doc/CMakeFiles/doc-man' failed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 Sergio Monteiro Bastochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||ser...@serjux.com --- Comment #17 from Sergio Monteiro Basto --- (In reply to Pavol Vican from comment #16) > It should be fixed. > > Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rh-lab-q/rpg/master/rpg.spec > > SRPM URL: > https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/nightly/rpg/fedora-rawhide- > x86_64/00162843-rpg/rpg-0.0.5-1.git.6.986013d.fc24.src.rpm Spec URL: https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/rpg/rpg.spec SRPM URL: https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/rpg/rpg-0.0.5-1.1.fc23.src.rpm I added this patch : https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/rpg/rpg.spec.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 --- Comment #16 from Pavol Vican--- It should be fixed. Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rh-lab-q/rpg/master/rpg.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/nightly/rpg/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00162843-rpg/rpg-0.0.5-1.git.6.986013d.fc24.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 --- Comment #12 from Ranjan Maitra--- (In reply to Jan Silhan from comment #11) > I am sorry for delay. Rawhide build fixed and I am providing new links. I am > not sure whether the `-b` option in fedora-review will work. Link to spec in > comment 2 cannot be invalidated. > > Spec URL: > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rh-lab-q/rpg/ > 263cc773c25e7ff51271a7b6c4f921aa82de8279/rpg.spec > > SRPM URL: > https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/nightly/rpg/fedora-rawhide- > x86_64/00157917-rpg/rpg-0.0.5-1.git.4.263cc77.fc24.src.rpm > Does this even build? As per fedora-review, using command: fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1280422 . INFO: Downloading .spec and .srpm files INFO: No upstream for (Source0): rpg-0.0.5.tar.gz INFO: Running checks and generating report ERROR: Exception(/home/mock/Downloads/mock/1280422-rpg/srpm/rpg-0.0.5-1.git.4.263cc77.fc24.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 0 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /home/mock/Downloads/mock/1280422-rpg/results ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output. Please try fedora-review on your package before uploading to save everyone some time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #13 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Ranjan, using fedora-review is optional. The package builds fine in mock, and the error you're seeing is most likely caused by a local issue on your end, e.g. mock confused by a bad mirror. You should try to build the package using mock directly, it'll give you more informative messages. But it's not something that the package submitter can do for you. OTOH, "No upstream for (Source0): rpg-0.0.5.tar.gz" is a valid complains. A full URL should be used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 --- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek--- The sources are contained in the SRPM, and this is enough to build packages. After the package is approved and imported into dist git, when building in koji the sources are downloaded from the lookaside cache. Either way, this line specifies the place that the sources originally came from, but is not used when building. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 --- Comment #11 from Jan Silhan--- I am sorry for delay. Rawhide build fixed and I am providing new links. I am not sure whether the `-b` option in fedora-review will work. Link to spec in comment 2 cannot be invalidated. Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rh-lab-q/rpg/263cc773c25e7ff51271a7b6c4f921aa82de8279/rpg.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/nightly/rpg/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00157917-rpg/rpg-0.0.5-1.git.4.263cc77.fc24.src.rpm (In reply to Ranjan Maitra from comment #10) > Btw, is it ok that your spec file requires python3-rpg? I don't see how this > should be got. yes, python3-rpg is a subpackage (library) and rpg is the GUI application using this library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 --- Comment #10 from Ranjan Maitra--- (In reply to Jan Silhan from comment #9) > links from comment 0 are invalidated now. Try it again, please. Great, thanks! But: I now get: $ fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1280422 INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1280422 INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 1280422 INFO: --> SRPM url: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/nightly/rpg/fedora-22-x86_64/00129295-rpg/rpg-0.0.4-1.git.20.4b321ab.fc22.src.rpm INFO: --> Spec url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rh-lab-q/rpg/4b321abe5942dd653f7269a6716f0134cfefdb3d/rpg.spec INFO: Using review directory: /home/maitra/Downloads/mock/1280422-rpg INFO: Downloading .spec and .srpm files INFO: No upstream for (Source0): rpg-0.0.4.tar.gz INFO: Running checks and generating report ERROR: Exception(/home/maitra/Downloads/mock/1280422-rpg/srpm/rpg-0.0.4-1.git.20.4b321ab.fc22.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 7 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /home/maitra/Downloads/mock/1280422-rpg/results ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output. Btw, is it ok that your spec file requires python3-rpg? I don't see how this should be got. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 --- Comment #9 from Jan Silhan--- links from comment 0 are invalidated now. Try it again, please. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 --- Comment #8 from Ranjan Maitra--- I tried using fedora-review tool on this, but it appears that there two src.rpms therefore there is a conflict. $ fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1280422 ERROR: Expected to find single rebuilt srpm, found 2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 Ranjan Maitrachanged: What|Removed |Added CC||itsme_...@yahoo.com --- Comment #6 from Ranjan Maitra --- Does this package still need a review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 Kevin Fenzichanged: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@scrye.com --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi --- I see no review here at all, and the package is not approved. Please do not import it or build it until it's been reviewed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 Till Maaschanged: What|Removed |Added CC||opensou...@till.name --- Comment #5 from Till Maas --- It looks like this package was created without the review being finished by accident. Therefore I retired it in Fedora. There needs to be a review done as described in: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 --- Comment #2 from Jan Silhan--- Fixed, these links should not contain different content type: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rh-lab-q/rpg/4b321abe5942dd653f7269a6716f0134cfefdb3d/rpg.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/nightly/rpg/fedora-22-x86_64/00129295-rpg/rpg-0.0.4-1.git.20.4b321ab.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 Raphael Gronerchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- Your links are b0rken. Please provide a link to a valid spec file in raw format, any html around it is of no usage here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review