[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

Alexander Kurtakov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

Tomas Repik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  ---
HdrHistogram-2.1.8-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-03-17 16:51:51



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
HdrHistogram-2.1.8-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3cc7c1c581

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
HdrHistogram-2.1.8-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3cc7c1c581

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #19 from jiri vanek  ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #17)
> --- SPECS/old/HdrHistogram.spec   2016-03-03 15:58:04.925801810 +0100
> +++ SPECS/HdrHistogram.spec   2016-03-07 12:37:58.916005527 +0100
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  Name:  HdrHistogram
>  Version:   2.1.8
> -Release:   2%{?dist}
> +Release:   1%{?dist}
>  Summary:   A High Dynamic Range (HDR) Histogram
>  License:   BSD and CC0
>  URL:   http://hdrhistogram.github.io/%{name}/
> @@ -59,10 +59,8 @@
>  %license COPYING.txt LICENSE.txt
>  
>  %changelog
> -* Thu Mar 03 2016 Tomas Repik  - 2.1.8-2
> +* Mon Mar 07 2016 Tomas Repik  - 2.1.8-1
>  - launcher HistogramLogProcessor installation
> -
> -* Mon Feb 08 2016 Tomas Repik  - 2.1.8-1
>  - Update to 2.1.8
>  
>  * Thu Oct 22 2015 gil cattaneo  2.1.7-1

Thanx!

The change is really harmless.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/HdrHistogram

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #17 from Tomas Repik  ---
--- SPECS/old/HdrHistogram.spec2016-03-03 15:58:04.925801810 +0100
+++ SPECS/HdrHistogram.spec2016-03-07 12:37:58.916005527 +0100
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  HdrHistogram
 Version:   2.1.8
-Release:   2%{?dist}
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   A High Dynamic Range (HDR) Histogram
 License:   BSD and CC0
 URL:   http://hdrhistogram.github.io/%{name}/
@@ -59,10 +59,8 @@
 %license COPYING.txt LICENSE.txt

 %changelog
-* Thu Mar 03 2016 Tomas Repik  - 2.1.8-2
+* Mon Mar 07 2016 Tomas Repik  - 2.1.8-1
 - launcher HistogramLogProcessor installation
-
-* Mon Feb 08 2016 Tomas Repik  - 2.1.8-1
 - Update to 2.1.8

 * Thu Oct 22 2015 gil cattaneo  2.1.7-1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #16 from jiri vanek  ---
Yah, you are right with flags.

About the c#15 - was there some change against the original one i approved?
If so, please post diff!

I short time I should be able to sponsor you.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #15 from Tomas Repik  ---
Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/HdrHistogram/HdrHistogram.spec
SRPM URL:
https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/HdrHistogram/HdrHistogram-2.1.8-1.fc23.src.rpm

* Mon Mar 07 2016 Tomas Repik  - 2.1.8-1
- launcher HistogramLogProcessor installation
- Update to 2.1.8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #14 from Tomas Repik  ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #12)
> Not sure how your other requests, but this oen was missing fedora-review=?
> If your other requestsd are missing it, set it for your own good.
I think the reviewer should set the fedora-review flag=? based on[1]:

"Wait for someone to review your package! At this point in the process, the
fedora-review flag is blank, meaning that no reviewer is assigned"

and

"A reviewer takes on the task of reviewing your package. They will set the
fedora-review flag to ?"

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

Tomas Repik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(tre...@redhat.com |
   |)   |



--- Comment #13 from Tomas Repik  ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #11)
> Thanx!
> It looks good.
> Just for curiosity - heve you seen your generated
> /usr/bin/HistogramLogProcessor ?-)
Yes I did check that file.

> From my side the package is ok.
> Before initial push I would recommend you to reset release to 1. 
Done.
> One note for future - its quite good to publish the spec/srpm in versioned
> way. Somthing like:
> Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/v1/HdrHistogram.spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/v1/HdrHistogram-2.1.8-1.fc23.src.rpm
> later
> Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/v2/HdrHistogram.spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/v2/HdrHistogram-2.1.8-2.fc23.src.rpm
> ...
> Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/vN/HdrHistogram.spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/vN/HdrHistogram-2.1.8-N.fc23.src.rpm
> 
> By so, the reviwer can easily diff what you had modified in spec/srpm
> 
> And of course reset the release at the end...
Thank you for the review, your guidance and useful tips. I'm goona keep them in
mind, for the future.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

jiri vanek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #12 from jiri vanek  ---
Not sure how your other requests, but this oen was missing fedora-review=?
If your other requestsd are missing it, set it for your own good.

This package is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

jiri vanek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tre...@redhat.com
  Flags||needinfo?(tre...@redhat.com
   ||)



--- Comment #11 from jiri vanek  ---
Thanx!
It looks good.
Just for curiosity - heve you seen your generated
/usr/bin/HistogramLogProcessor ?-)

From my side the package is ok.
Before initial push I would recommend you to reset release to 1.

One note for future - its quite good to publish the spec/srpm in versioned way.
Somthing like:
Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/v1/HdrHistogram.spec
SRPM URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/v1/HdrHistogram-2.1.8-1.fc23.src.rpm
later
Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/v2/HdrHistogram.spec
SRPM URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/v2/HdrHistogram-2.1.8-2.fc23.src.rpm
...
Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/vN/HdrHistogram.spec
SRPM URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/vN/HdrHistogram-2.1.8-N.fc23.src.rpm

By so, the reviwer can easily diff what you had modified in spec/srpm

And of course reset the release at the end...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #10 from Tomas Repik  ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #9)
> 48: %jpackage_script org.fedoraproject.helloworld.HelloWorld "" "" %{name}
> helloworld true
Done.
> Also I would go with %{_bindir}
Done.

Also installed and tried running (with no error)
$ HistogramLogProcessor -h

I would also try other functionality but, I can't find a propper log file to
test it on.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #9 from jiri vanek  ---
Hello!

You tried to install this package+launcher and it worked?

I did not, but:
cp HistogramLogProcessor %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/HistogramLogProcessor 

Can never work.
Even ig, it is against all guidelines.
Check: https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc/#_example_rpm_project
:
48: %jpackage_script org.fedoraproject.helloworld.HelloWorld "" "" %{name}
helloworld true

Also I would go with %{_bindir}  : 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros?rd=Packaging/RPMMacros

Unlkess tehre is something really mysterious, you have to rewrite the launcher.
For the launcher - googling is not much useful, but the doc above should be
enough. If you will wail, I will help you bit more...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #8 from Tomas Repik  ---
Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/HdrHistogram.spec
SRPM URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/HdrHistogram-2.1.8-2.fc23.src.rpm

* Wed Mar 02 2016 Tomas Repik  - 2.1.8-2
- launcher HistogramLogProcessor installation

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #7 from jiri vanek  ---
I can agree on it. But Still I would say  - upstream have an launcher =>
include launcher.
No subpackage needed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #6 from Tomas Repik  ---
Well, first of all thanks for the review, I appreciate it. 

> Thoughts?
For me it's more like a library than a real runable application although it
would make sense as well. I could try and create something like subpackage with
the main class from HistogramLogProcessor.java, but it's not the core function
and not important to include.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

jiri vanek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(jva...@redhat.com |
   |)   |



--- Comment #5 from jiri vanek  ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #4)
> (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #3)
> > [!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
> > 
> > Unless there is some reason I cant see, i probably insists execution of
> > tests during build. there is even  junit in In original sources.
> 
> Tests are executed during build, using maven-surefire-plugin. Only
> HistogramPerfTest is not run, but I don't think it's necessary. As [1]
> tells: "Optional %check section
> Runs projects integration tests. Unit test are usually run in %build
> section, so if there are no integration tests available, this section is
> omitted"

I always forget that forcing maven run build and tests one by one is a bit
hackisch.  So yes, I donto wont to foorce you to split build and test run. And
integration tests seems really not necessary.
>  
> > [!]: Package functions as described.
> > 
> > There is quite a lot interesting things in the source tarball. One of them
> > is launcher. Others are web based histrograms. I would expect them to work
> > in installed application. Rightnow they are just missing.
> 
> I can't see any more files needed to be installed. Can you be more specific?
> 
> [1] https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc/#_example_rpm_project

You are saying yoursef:  48: %jpackage_script
org.fedoraproject.helloworld.HelloWorld "" "" %{name} helloworld true

:)

More serious - there is launcher HistogramLogProcessor. I watched it more
closely, and although it probably deserves to be rewritten and packed inside 
as launcher, it do not seems to be doing main functionality of this package.

Originally I thougth that this program will take an fil/input of numbers and
create histogram..image...

But looking to list of mainclasses:
src/perf/java/org/HdrHistogram/HistogramPerfTest.java:public static void
main(String[] args) {
src/main/java/org/HdrHistogram/HistogramLogProcessor.java:public static
void main(final String[] args)  {
src/examples/java/SimpleHistogramExample.java:public static void main(final
String[] args) {


My assumption was probably wrong. Thoughts?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

Tomas Repik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(jva...@redhat.com
   ||)



--- Comment #4 from Tomas Repik  ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #3)
> [!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
> 
> Unless there is some reason I cant see, i probably insists execution of
> tests during build. there is even  junit in In original sources.

Tests are executed during build, using maven-surefire-plugin. Only
HistogramPerfTest is not run, but I don't think it's necessary. As [1] tells:
"Optional %check section
Runs projects integration tests. Unit test are usually run in %build section,
so if there are no integration tests available, this section is omitted"

> [!]: Package functions as described.
> 
> There is quite a lot interesting things in the source tarball. One of them
> is launcher. Others are web based histrograms. I would expect them to work
> in installed application. Rightnow they are just missing.

I can't see any more files needed to be installed. Can you be more specific?

[1] https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc/#_example_rpm_project

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #3 from jiri vanek  ---
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.

Unless there is some reason I cant see, i probably insists execution of tests
during build. there is even  junit in In original sources.


[!]: Package functions as described.

There is quite a lot interesting things in the source tarball. One of them is
launcher. Others are web based histrograms. I would expect them to work in
installed application. Rightnow they are just missing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496



--- Comment #2 from jiri vanek  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 93 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/jvanek/1305496-HdrHistogram/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
 Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It
 is pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
 subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)

Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even
 when building with ant
[x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
 utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use .mfiles file list instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

jiri vanek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jva...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jva...@redhat.com



--- Comment #1 from jiri vanek  ---
But I cant be sponsor. (iirc)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1010003 (bigdata-review)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010003
[Bug 1010003] bigdata-sig review-tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review