[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1261614 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261614 [Bug 1261614] [RFE] Please upgrade Skrooge to latest stable version 2.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
--- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter ---
Offhand, in -devel subpkg I see:
1.
%{_includedir}/%{name}/sqlite3ext.h
%{_includedir}/%{name}/sqlite3.h
which implies that
%{_includedir}/%{name}
dir is not owned, imo, easier to replace those 2 lines with just:
%{_includedir}/sqlcipher/
(personal preference of mine to not use %name macro here, so that it'll
continue to work regardless of the actual package name)
2.
%{_libdir}/libsqlcipher-3.8.10.2.so.0
%{_libdir}/libsqlcipher-3.8.10.2.so.0.8.6
these libraries should be in the main pkg (not -devel), and include ldconfig
scriptlets
3.
%{_libdir}/libsqlcipher.la
libtool archives should not be included in packaging, this file should be
deleted or otherwise excluded.
4. %package -devel MUST have a tighter dependency on the main pkg, instead of
Requires: %{name} = %{version}
use
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
5. SHOULD document why these compiler flags are needed in a .spec comment
CFLAGS="-DSQLITE_HAS_CODEC -DSQLITE_TEMP_STORE=2"
LDFLAGS="-lcrypto"
6. While you're at it, MUST respect distro compiler flags, using (something
like)
CFLAGS="%{optflags} -DSQLITE_HAS_CODEC -DSQLITE_TEMP_STORE=2"
LDFLAGS="%{?__global_ldflags} -lcrypto"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms, ||siddharth@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(siddharth.kde@gma ||il.com) --- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner --- Hi, is there any progress with this package? I could do the official review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Siddharth Sharma changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(siddharth.kde@gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #3 from Siddharth Sharma --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #2) > Hi, > is there any progress with this package? I could do the official review. Thanks I will fix it today. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #4 from Siddharth Sharma --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #2) > Hi, > is there any progress with this package? I could do the official review. new SPEC and SRPM SPEC: https://siddharths.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/sqlcipher.spec SRPM: https://siddharths.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/sqlcipher-3.3.1-2.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #5 from Siddharth Sharma --- It would also be good to look at this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813 while reviewing new specs in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294#c4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) CC||a...@outcomedubious.im --- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner --- *** Bug 996813 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Siddharth Sharma changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner --- Why do you set the fedora-review flag for yourself? That's not in conjunction with the common process, instead a reviewer have to do that (besides also assigning the bug). https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #28 from Sudhir Khanger --- Can this be closed as sqlcipher is already available now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2016-07-27 16:14:20 |2017-01-07 10:18:02 --- Comment #29 from Rex Dieter --- Yes, closing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #8 from Siddharth Sharma --- I anyone looking to do fedora-review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #9 from Siddharth Sharma --- Is anyone looking to do fedora-review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner --- What's your FAS account? Please use the same e-mail address and name for your Bugzilla account. Otherwise, people have trouble to identify you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner --- (In reply to Siddharth Sharma from comment #4) > (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #2) > > Hi, > > is there any progress with this package? I could do the official review. > > new SPEC and SRPM > > SPEC: https://siddharths.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/sqlcipher.spec > SRPM: > https://siddharths.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/sqlcipher-3.3.1-2.fc23.src.rpm Review swap with bug #1343733? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #12 from Siddharth Sharma --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #10) > What's your FAS account? Please use the same e-mail address and name for > your Bugzilla account. Otherwise, people have trouble to identify you. FAS: siddharths -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #13 from Raphael Groner --- Are you interested in a review swap? See comment #11. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #14 from Raphael Groner --- Are you interested in some review for mono packages to do a review swap? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter --- I can review today -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294
--- Comment #16 from Rex Dieter ---
Looks good, all the blocker items mentioned previously were addressed.
Remaining items to consider:
5. SHOULD document why these compiler flags are needed in a .spec comment
CFLAGS="-DSQLITE_HAS_CODEC -DSQLITE_TEMP_STORE=2"
LDFLAGS="-lcrypto"
...
I'd suggest a comment:
# recommended in README.md ## Compiling section
7a. MUST use %%license tag, instead of:
%doc LICENSE README.md
use
%doc README.md
%license LICENSE
7b. SHOULD, since main pkg already includes README.md and LICENSE, no need to
include in -devel and -tcl subpkg's too, please remove them.
8. (since you're already using %{make_install}), SHOULD use convenience macro
%{make_build}
instead of
make %{?_smp_mflags}
use
%{make_build}
naming: ok
sources: ok
26be3c23220192fb42e1d60f8c90ac69 v3.3.1.tar.gz
macros: ok
scriptlets: ok
licensing: NOT ok
9. MUST use
License: BSD
to match recommendation on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
10a. SHOULD consider using build option:
--disable-tcl
and avoid the hassle of the -tcl subpkg, unless you specifically are willing to
support this.
10b. MUST: If you choose to keep -tcl subpkg, then must add a versioned
dependency to main pkg:
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
11. MUST remove
%define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0
there are better ways of fixing unpackaged files than this hack, for example,
adding this after %{make_install}:
rm -fv %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/lib*.la
12. MUST fix rpath issues, doing a local build, I get:
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/share/tcl8.6/sqlite3/libtclsqlite3.so' contains a
standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/sqlcipher' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64'
in [/usr/lib64]
per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath
adding after %configure, this helps:
13. SHOULD remove deprecated items/tags from .spec, including:
(from %install section):
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Please fix all MUST (blocker) items, and I will approve this package review.
Consider addressing SHOULD (optional) items too, and you'll be extra awesome.
If it helps, here's a copy of
https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/sqlcipher.spec
that implements all the suggested fixes (I think).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #17 from Rex Dieter --- re-reading, looks like my item 12 was missing the actual spec suggestion: ... this helps: # fix/workaround hard-coded rpaths sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #18 from Siddharth Sharma --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #17) > re-reading, looks like my item 12 was missing the actual spec suggestion: > ... this helps: > # fix/workaround hard-coded rpaths > sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' > libtool > sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool Thanks a lot Rex :) Will fix it asap. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #19 from Siddharth Sharma --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #17) > re-reading, looks like my item 12 was missing the actual spec suggestion: > ... this helps: > # fix/workaround hard-coded rpaths > sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' > libtool > sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool Updated for Review SPECS: https://siddharths.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/sqlcipher.spec SRPMS: https://siddharths.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/sqlcipher-3.3.1-4.fc24.src.rpm I removed tcl from packaging and openssl-devel was missing from build requires. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Rex Dieter --- Looks good, APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/sqlcipher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Siddharth Sharma changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2016-07-27 16:14:20 --- Comment #22 from Siddharth Sharma --- builds submitted http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15039542 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15039547 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15039559 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15039582 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #23 from Rex Dieter --- Are you planning on submitting updates for f24/f23 to bodhi? (I don't see any yet) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- sqlcipher-3.3.1-4.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-068d457ba0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- sqlcipher-3.3.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5ff49b651b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- sqlcipher-3.3.1-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5ff49b651b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System --- sqlcipher-3.3.1-4.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-068d457ba0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
