[Bug 1317182] Review Request: erlang-fast_xml - Fast Expat based Erlang XML parsing and manipulation library

2016-04-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317182

Randy Barlow  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||erlang-fast_xml-1.1.11-2.fc
   ||25
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2016-04-12 12:07:19



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1317182] Review Request: erlang-fast_xml - Fast Expat based Erlang XML parsing and manipulation library

2016-04-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317182

Peter Lemenkov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov  ---
REVIEW:

Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable

+ rpmlint isn't silent but all these messages may be safely omitted:

Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../SRPMS/erlang-fast_xml-1.1.11-2.fc24.src.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/erlang-fast_xml-*
erlang-fast_xml.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xmerl -> Merle
erlang-fast_xml.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml -> XML, ml, x
ml
erlang-fast_xml.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xmerl -> Merle
erlang-fast_xml.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml -> XML, ml,
x ml

^^^ false positive.

erlang-fast_xml.x86_64: W: no-soname
/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/fast_xml-1.1.11/priv/lib/fxml.so
erlang-fast_xml.x86_64: W: no-soname
/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/fast_xml-1.1.11/priv/lib/fxml_stream.so

^^^ these libraries will be dlopened so not having so-name is fine.

erlang-fast_xml-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) xml -> XML,
ml, x ml
erlang-fast_xml-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml
-> XML, ml, x ml

^^^ false positive as well.

3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.

Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: 

+ The package is named according to the  Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the (yet to be finalized) Erlang Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (Apache
2.0).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.

Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum 1.1.11.tar.gz*
61bd5b9d6ff454865d864106ab02b769bb4313461dcd011a4c4803886d4814ba  1.1.11.tar.gz
61bd5b9d6ff454865d864106ab02b769bb4313461dcd011a4c4803886d4814ba 
1.1.11.tar.gz.1
Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: 


+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files in some of the dynamic linker's default paths.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
0 The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
0 No C/C++ header files.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 No devel sub-package.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.


APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1317182] Review Request: erlang-fast_xml - Fast Expat based Erlang XML parsing and manipulation library

2016-04-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317182

Peter Lemenkov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov  ---
I'll review it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1317182] Review Request: erlang-fast_xml - Fast Expat based Erlang XML parsing and manipulation library

2016-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317182



--- Comment #2 from Randy Barlow  ---
Thank you Peter, it's fixed in release 2:

Spec URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-fast_xml.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-fast_xml-1.1.11-2.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1317182] Review Request: erlang-fast_xml - Fast Expat based Erlang XML parsing and manipulation library

2016-03-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317182

Peter Lemenkov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lemen...@gmail.com



--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov  ---
You should remove "%global debug_package %{nil}" because this package contains
so-library and therefore should have debuginfo sub-package.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1317182] Review Request: erlang-fast_xml - Fast Expat based Erlang XML parsing and manipulation library

2016-03-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317182

Randy Barlow  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1312517




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312517
[Bug 1312517] ejabberd-16.02 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review