[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2017-08-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2017-08-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-05-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-05-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-05-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-05-07 07:45:01



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-05-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-daa1d22236

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-170517de6b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-515d081638

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6103c4ed2e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7d82f63f92

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-515d081638

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7d82f63f92

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6103c4ed2e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-170517de6b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-daa1d22236

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #5 from Luya Tshimbalanga  ---
Thank you Mukundan.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929

Mukundan Ragavan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Mukundan Ragavan  ---
I do not think I have anything to complain about. APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #3 from Mukundan Ragavan  ---

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
  Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gimpfx-foundry
  See:
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Package_Names

---> Unretiring the package. This is fine.

= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.

---> License not included in the source package.


[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
 found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.


---> Pretty much every file has license headers. Headers mention what the
license is which is clearly indicated in the spec file.

[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: Buildroot is not present
 Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.

---> Please check with upstream about including license file. Not a blocker
though.

[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer 

[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929

Mukundan Ragavan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||nonamed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nonamed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from Mukundan Ragavan  ---
taking for review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929

Luya Tshimbalanga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1000885 (DESIGN-SW)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000885
[Bug 1000885] Tracker: Review Requests for Design related packages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1327929] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional plugins for GIMP

2016-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929



--- Comment #1 from Luya Tshimbalanga  ---
Koji result:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13695720

It is basically the resurrection of the old package from Fedora 16 with cleaned
up spec to adhere to the guideline.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org