[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 Raphael Gronerchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|1343738 (lxqt-admin)| Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2016-07-06 14:53:01 --- Comment #15 from Raphael Groner --- Agreed. Closing. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343738 [Bug 1343738] Review Request: lxqt-admin - LXQt system administration tool -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 --- Comment #14 from mulhern--- I'm assuming this and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343733 can be closed, since the packages are not needed by lxqt-admin. On the other hand, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343608 is still open. It is _very_ simple, pure Python, and should be essentially a rubber stamp. Do you think you can do it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 --- Comment #13 from Raphael Groner--- (In reply to mulhern from comment #12) > _Very_ active. They seem to be in process of removing liboobs dependency due > to the fact that it is not maintained. > > See: 446891a14e5810c8fe395031008d406005b52dc7 and current README. Thanks for the hint. I overlooked that and 'll apply the patch or use latest git snapshot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 --- Comment #12 from mulhern--- _Very_ active. They seem to be in process of removing liboobs dependency due to the fact that it is not maintained. See: 446891a14e5810c8fe395031008d406005b52dc7 and current README. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 --- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner--- Both dependencies are needed for lxqt-admin, bug #1343738. LXQt development is very active. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 --- Comment #10 from mulhern--- So the first question is, is it worth packaging? Last commit was in 2011, what makes it suddenly so desirable for Fedora in 2016? Two apparently reasonable PRs were opened in 2014 and completely ignored by the maintainers (eventually closed by the person who opened them). That's not usually a good sign. The fixes are small, but those are usually the easiest to merge if you are paying attention at all. system-tools-backends also stopped in 2011, but its history since then is more obscure. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 --- Comment #9 from mulhern--- Associated FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/633 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 --- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner--- (In reply to mulhern from comment #7) > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1587 Commented. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 --- Comment #7 from mulhern--- https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1587 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 Rex Dieterchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter --- If you want a distro *policy* decision, FESCo is probably the better body to query, FPC is more about technical-only packaging issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 --- Comment #5 from Raphael Groner--- Hi mulhern, thanks again for your interest. This lib depends on stb, could you do the review there, too and first? Otherwise, we need to keep with copr builds cause of the broken dependency till packages reach into testing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 mulhernchanged: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|amulh...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 --- Comment #4 from mulhern--- I have asked: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/7QPY4DY4HAX34N3NCTODXYNIDGWFREDZ/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 --- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner--- libsexy and libsexymm are not forbidden, either. What's your point? Can you make a better suggestion for the package name? There's a guideline to use the upstream project name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 mulhernchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||amulh...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from mulhern --- It's unfortunate that the upstream developers couldn't resist a lame sexist joke. Does FPC have any sort of policy about this kind of thing? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 Raphael Gronerchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1343733 | |(system-tools-backends) | Depends On||1343733 ||(system-tools-backends) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343733 [Bug 1343733] Review Request: system-tools-backends - Common DBus interface to modify or read the system configuration -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 Raphael Gronerchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1343738 (lxqt-admin) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343738 [Bug 1343738] Review Request: lxqt-admin - LXQt system administration tool -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343734] Review Request: liboobs - Wrapping library to the System Tools Backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734 Raphael Gronerchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1343733 ||(system-tools-backends) Summary|Review Request: -|Wrapping library to the |Wrapping library to the |System Tools Backends |System Tools Backends | Alias||liboobs Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343733 [Bug 1343733] Review Request: system-tools-backends - Common DBus interface to modify or read the system configuration -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org