[Bug 1352215] Review Request: llvm37 -- Versioned LLVM 3.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352215 --- Comment #7 from Milan Bouchet-Valat --- Actually, I wanted to follow that naming convention too, but in the initial review I was asked to use llvm33 instead. Glad to see the guidelines have been made more explicit. I've changed it back to llvm3.7. I've just requested the creation of a new git repo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352215] Review Request: llvm37 -- Versioned LLVM 3.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352215 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts --- Sorry, what request do you need to be validated? Have you requested your package in the package database? You can use this ticket as the reference. I can process the request, or if John does it first then he'll see this ticket. However, it is important to note that this package is not correctly named, and you only get the review exemption if you actually follow the naming guidelines. The name should be "llvm3.7". Unless it really is version thirty-seven. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming The fact that llvm33 and certainly other packages are doing it wrong isn't a good reason for failing to do it correctly now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352215] Review Request: llvm37 -- Versioned LLVM 3.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352215 --- Comment #5 from Milan Bouchet-Valat --- I still need somebody to support my request in order to get the git repos set up. :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352215] Review Request: llvm37 -- Versioned LLVM 3.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352215 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts --- Yeah, I didn't see the point in reviewing something that had already been reviewed. Though I'm sure it could be cleaned up, there is probably utility in keeping the specs and organization similar between versions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352215] Review Request: llvm37 -- Versioned LLVM 3.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352215 --- Comment #3 from Milan Bouchet-Valat --- Thanks! As per the latest guidelines, it seems that we don't actually have to follow the standard review process since LLVM is already packaged in Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Process I'd still appreciate your comments, and of course I need somebody other than me to validate the request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352215] Review Request: llvm37 -- Versioned LLVM 3.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352215 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||llvm37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352215] Review Request: llvm37 -- Versioned LLVM 3.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352215 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen --- I am taking a look. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352215] Review Request: llvm37 -- Versioned LLVM 3.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352215 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1206852 (ghc-8.0.1) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206852 [Bug 1206852] ghc-8.0.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352215] Review Request: llvm37 -- Versioned LLVM 3.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352215 Milan Bouchet-Valat changed: What|Removed |Added CC||or...@cora.nwra.com, ||peter...@redhat.com Blocks||505154 (FE-SCITECH) --- Comment #1 from Milan Bouchet-Valat --- Jens, Orion: Since you've followed the review for llvm33, you're probably in the best position to review this new one. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 [Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
