[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363

Milan Bouchet-Valat  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2017-07-10 07:37:24



--- Comment #30 from Milan Bouchet-Valat  ---
llvm3.9 is in F26 for some time now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #29 from Orion Poplawski  ---
I think I'm good, so go ahead.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #28 from Milan Bouchet-Valat  ---
Thanks. I've pushed my patches. Do you need anything more, or should we trigger
a build?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #27 from Orion Poplawski  ---
Done.  Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #26 from Milan Bouchet-Valat  ---
Sorry for the delay. I don't really care about where things are installed as
long as I can build Julia with the package. Can you upload your version of the
package to git? Then I'll need to add some more patches for 4.0 backports.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #25 from Orion Poplawski  ---
My updated install_dirs.patch doesn't quite work with your current -2 llvm
package.  I get:

CMake Error at /usr/lib64/cmake/llvm3.9/LLVMConfig.cmake:165 (include):
  include could not find load file:

/usr//usr/lib64/cmake/llvm3.9/LLVMExports.cmake

because LLVM_INSTALL_PACKAGE_DIR is being specified as a complete path and the
LLVMConfig.cmake file doesn't support that.

-DLLVM_INSTALL_PACKAGE_DIR=%{_libdir}/cmake/%{name} \

But I don't think that should be too hard to fix.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #24 from Orion Poplawski  ---
Here's my current version:

https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/llvm3.9.spec
https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/llvm3.9-3.9.1-4.el7.src.rpm

* Fri Feb 10 2017 Orion Poplawski  - 3.9.1-4
- Add patch to add sonames to libraries
- Make -static require ncurses-devel

* Thu Feb 9 2017 Orion Poplawski  - 3.9.1-3
- Install into libdir prefix

This sets a SOVERSION for libraries, and by extension for clang since it uses
llvm's cmake macros.  This prevents the versioned llvm or clang from loading
the wrong libraries.

This also updates the install_dirs.patch to allow clang to be able to do
find_package(LLVM).

I'm doing some builds locally and at
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/orion/llvm_versioned/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #23 from Orion Poplawski  ---
It's really not that different from how we handle MPI packages:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI

What would really be good to do is to have clang's CMakeLists.txt do:

find_package(LLVM 3.9 REQUIRED)
list(APPEND CMAKE_MODULE_PATH "${LLVM_CMAKE_DIR}")

but this will require more fixes to LLVMConfig.cmake.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #22 from Milan Bouchet-Valat  ---
I don't like the idea of putting everything under /lib64/llvm3.9. That probably
doesn't follow the FHS, even if we add symlinks. It took me quite some work to
improve LLVM's CMake build system, so why not make Clang use that? All the
required support is there.

For example, it looks like Clang should use LLVM_CMAKE_DIR to find where CMake
files have been installed. If you need to get that information from llvm-config
instead, we can add an argument for it. Or you could just hardcode it since
it's not going to change and the LLVM version is hardcoded too.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #21 from Orion Poplawski  ---
Here is my current spec that installs into prefix:

https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/llvm3.9.spec

I've also kept the versioned binaries for everything except llvm-config.  With
this I'm able to build clang3.9 with:

export PATH=%{_libdir}/llvm%{major_version}/bin:$PATH

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #20 from Milan Bouchet-Valat  ---
I haven't had the time to look in depth to this, but it looks like the
incorrect LLVMConfing.cmake path should be fixed upstream. I think there's even
a CMake variable for this, which I might even have fixed in recent versions of
my patch.

OTOH, indeed we will have to stop renaming files under /usr/bin, and instead
put them under a specific directory, if we want Clang to be able to find them
just using llvm-config.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #19 from Orion Poplawski  ---
Well, my attempt at installing into will not work with current llvm-config if
we want to keep the llvm-%{major_version} names in /usr/bin.  Multi-lib
requires those names to the binaries (since links in /usr/bin would conflict),
but llvm-config now determines the prefix by resolving the path and going up a
directory.  If we dropped the versioned names we could keep the binaries in
%_libdir/%name/bin.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #18 from Orion Poplawski  ---
And now looking at 3.9 - 

/usr/lib64/cmake/llvm3.9/LLVMExports.cmake:set(_IMPORT_PREFIX "/usr")

leads to errors like:

CMake Error at //usr/lib64/cmake/llvm3.9/LLVMExports.cmake:888 (message):
  The imported target "llvm-tblgen" references the file

 "/usr/bin/llvm-tblgen"

  but this file does not exist.  Possible reasons include:

Another reason I think we need to install into a separate prefix.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #17 from Orion Poplawski  ---
Here are the issues I've encountered trying to use llvm3.X, including building
clang3.X with llvm3.X:

- clang wants to find 'llvm-config', but currently this is
'llvm-config-%{_isa_bits}-3.X'.  I modified llvm3.7 to make llvm-config
available in %_libdir/%name/bin, so you can just add that to PATH.  This helps
with other tools as well.

- clang wants to find LLVMConfing.cmake in `llvm-config
--prefix`/share/llvm/cmake, but:

# llvm-config-64-3.9 --prefix
/usr

which makes it look in /usr/share/llvm/cmake, which is wrong.  While looking at
packaging clang3.X I've ended up installing into %_libdir/%name so that
--prefix can work.  See bug #1420512 for my current package.

Alternatively I can patch clang's CMakeLists.txt to work, and perhaps it's
worth working with clang upstream to find a solution.

- I'm a little concerned about the overlap with alternatives between the
various llvm packages.  In some ways it's nice to install any one and have
access to llvm-config, but the priority is all the same so it seems
indeterminate as to which becomes active.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #16 from Milan Bouchet-Valat  ---
I don't understand what you mean. We don't currently move libraries around, we
just pass the needed paths to configure/cmake. My patch against the CMake
system ensures llvm-config returns the correct paths, else it couldn't be
accepted upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #15 from Orion Poplawski  ---
My bad - I got confused with too many different versions at the same time.

I've been playing around with trying to build a versioned clang with the
versioned llvm packages (you've seen my commits to llvm3.7 towards that).  I'm
starting to think it would be better to install into a prefix (%_libdir/%name)
and then move/symlink from there rather than the reverse in order to get the
output of llvm-config right and satisfy some assumptions of the clang package.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #14 from Milan Bouchet-Valat  ---
Are you sure? I just downloaded the SRPM again, and the .spec file calls
%cmake, not ./configure.

Update on progress: the patch is still being reviewed upstream. If that takes
too long, I'll push the package with the current patch, but for now there's no
hurry (at least for me).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #13 from Orion Poplawski  ---
I don't think the content of
https://nalimilan.fedorapeople.org/llvm3.9-3.9.1-2.fc24.src.rpm is correct.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski  ---
This package doesn't build for me:

+ ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
--program-prefix= --disable-dependency-tracking --prefix=/usr
--exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc
--datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64
--libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/var/lib
--mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info
--with-extra-options=-fno-devirtualize --with-extra-ld-options=-Wl,-Bsymbolic
--libdir=/usr/lib64/llvm3.9 --includedir=/usr/include/llvm3.9 --disable-polly
--disable-libcpp --enable-cxx11 --enable-clang-arcmt
--enable-clang-static-analyzer --enable-clang-rewriter --enable-optimized
--disable-profiling --disable-assertions --disable-werror
--disable-expensive-checks --enable-debug-runtime --enable-keep-symbols
--enable-jit --enable-docs --disable-doxygen --enable-threads --enable-pthreads
--enable-zlib --enable-pic --enable-shared --enable-timestamps
--enable-backtraces
--enable-targets=x86,powerpc,arm,aarch64,cpp,nvptx,systemz,r600
--enable-bindings=none --enable-libffi --enable-ltdl-install
--with-binutils-include=/usr/include


The LLVM project no longer supports building with configure & make.

Please migrate to the CMake-based build system.
For more information see: http://llvm.org/docs/CMake.html



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #11 from Milan Bouchet-Valat  ---
No, it doesn't contain clang. Indeed it's a separate package since 3.7 AFAICT,
so somebody will have to package it separately. Note that since the port to
CMake, versioned install directories are no longer supported, so that will
likely require some work. The patches I use for llvm3.9 are being reviewed at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28234

I'll push the contents of llvm3.9 after that upstream review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363

Jeremy Newton  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||alexjn...@gmail.com



--- Comment #10 from Jeremy Newton  ---
Will there also be a clang3.9? I believe clang was recently separated from
llvm, so a clang counterpart maybe in order, although I'm not sure if this is
useful.

As well, this could also be branched onto F25 to provide better performance and
functionality to mesa but would require a clang3.9 counterpart for building
IIRC, see bug #1381109 for details.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/llvm3.9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 - Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363

Kevin Fenzi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@scrye.com
Summary|Review Request: llvm3.9 --  |Review Request: llvm3.9 -
   |Versioned LLVM 3.9  |Versioned LLVM 3.9
  Flags||fedora-review+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 -- Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #8 from Milan Bouchet-Valat  ---
Yes, for now rawhide has 3.9.0, but I expect F26 to ship with 4.0, which will
be released in February. So indeed for the next few weeks it's going to be
redundant, but I figured I'd better start the review process early.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 -- Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen  ---
Just for the record llvm 3.9.0 is already in Rawhide since end of Nov.

Or maybe do you still need llvm3.9 for current releases?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 -- Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #6 from Milan Bouchet-Valat  ---
No worries.

Here's the Koji build on all arches:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17155580

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 -- Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363

Kevin Fenzi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ke...@scrye.com



--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Ah, right you are, but thats a bit unclear to me. I guess it implies that
whoever is processing the scm request has to check those things. "The package
MUST be properly named according to the naming guidelines and MUST NOT conflict
with all other versions of the same package. If these requirements are not met,
an exemption is required as above." 

I don't have time to check those now, but can try and do so later, or someone
else can look and finish processing this. Sorry for the delay.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 -- Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #4 from Milan Bouchet-Valat  ---
Kevin: I'm fine with going through a review, but I was told the contrary for
llvm3.7, and the rules at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Process
seem to imply otherwise. Maybe they could be made more explicit?

Orion: Thanks. These issues actually come from the original llvm .spec file.
I've also noticed another issue with Requires(posttrans) being repeated instead
of Requires(postun). All of them are fixed in the new version; they should be
added to llvm.spec too.

I've also disabled generating HTML docs: since the recent Sphinx update, the
build fails with obscure errors. This package isn't intended for general
development anyway, people would better use llvm for that.

Finally, I've added patches needed by Julia.

Spec URL: https://nalimilan.fedorapeople.org/llvm3.9.spec
SRPM URL: https://nalimilan.fedorapeople.org/llvm3.9-3.9.1-2.fc24.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 -- Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski  ---
llvm3.9.spec:35: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 35, tab: line
10)

I think -static is missing:

Requires:   %{name}-devel%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}

No %license?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 -- Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: The package must be reviewed
and fedora-review flag set to + before you can request the package.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 -- Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #1 from Milan Bouchet-Valat  ---
I've just filed an SCM admin request.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 -- Versioned LLVM 3.9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363

Milan Bouchet-Valat  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||or...@cora.nwra.com,
   ||peter...@redhat.com
  Alias||llvm3.9



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org