[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-07-13 10:50:59



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b692c4e5e1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-96b836bb86

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-04d6090cf2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-477dc9fe73

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-04d6090cf2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libdxflib

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949

Lubomir Rintel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lkund...@v3.sk



--- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel  ---
I've now sponsored Samuel into the packager group. Please go ahead, import and
build the package.

Thank you both!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949

Antonio Trande  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #10 from Antonio Trande  ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #9)
> (In reply to srakitnican from comment #7)
> > I am actually wondering why it depends on Qt at all, I thought it is using
> > it just for the build system.
> 
> Maybe.

This package is approved for me.
You need a sponsor.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande  ---
(In reply to srakitnican from comment #7)
> I am actually wondering why it depends on Qt at all, I thought it is using
> it just for the build system.

Maybe.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #8 from srakitnican  ---
This is much more like it:
$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-25-x86_64/result/libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm 
/sbin/ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.11)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.20)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.21)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)


Changes from previous release:

* Remove unicode trademark sign from description
* Use macro for make
* Disable qmake linking to Qt


SPEC:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/srakitnican/default/libdxflib.git/plain/libdxflib.spec?id=408bff6bcd4c11bae4a063e7115b2c8c792fa153
SRPM:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/srakitnican/default/fedora-25-ppc64le/00561004-libdxflib/libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #7 from srakitnican  ---
I am actually wondering why it depends on Qt at all, I thought it is using it
just for the build system.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #6 from srakitnican  ---
Under the same name/path?

I am asking because here's the case that library is called exactly the same for
both qt4 and qt5, in that case packages would conflict, is that OK?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande  ---
(In reply to srakitnican from comment #4)
> Thank you for your review!
> 
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #3)
> > SPEC url is not reachable with Fedora tools, please use that one from copr
> > or a direct link to the file as a plain text.
> 
> There is no git tree when first version of the package is submitted, hence I
> can not use copr for that, but I should be able to use it for next releases.
> 
> 
> > ===
> > - qcad is built with Qt5 on Fedora rawhide (27).
> >   Please, make a Qt5 version too.
> 
> I am not sure what do you mean by that. Should I build a separate package,
> subpackage, or just make it an option?
> 
> Do you have any examples of similar packages?
>  
> > - You can use %make_build and %make_install macros.
> 
> I think I can use %make_build, not so sure about %make_install.

A sub-package like 'qt5-streamer':
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/qt-gstreamer.git/tree/qt-gstreamer.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #4 from srakitnican  ---
Thank you for your review!

(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #3)
> SPEC url is not reachable with Fedora tools, please use that one from copr
> or a direct link to the file as a plain text.

There is no git tree when first version of the package is submitted, hence I
can not use copr for that, but I should be able to use it for next releases.


> ===
> - qcad is built with Qt5 on Fedora rawhide (27).
>   Please, make a Qt5 version too.

I am not sure what do you mean by that. Should I build a separate package,
subpackage, or just make it an option?

Do you have any examples of similar packages?

> - You can use %make_build and %make_install macros.

I think I can use %make_build, not so sure about %make_install.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande  ---
SPEC url is not reachable with Fedora tools, please use that one from copr or a
direct link to the file as a plain text.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- qcad is built with Qt5 on Fedora rawhide (27).
  Please, make a Qt5 version too.

- You can use %make_build and %make_install macros.

= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "LGPL", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 14 files
 have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/sagitter/libdxflib/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
 libdxflib-debuginfo
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
 justified.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tcall...@redhat.com
 Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal)   |



--- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway  ---
** This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
** it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
** the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
** (at your option) any later version.
**
** Licensees holding valid dxflib Professional Edition licenses may use 
** this file in accordance with the dxflib Commercial License
** Agreement provided with the Software.
**
** This file is provided AS IS with NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING THE
** WARRANTY OF DESIGN, MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
**

Basically, in English, if the GPL makes you uncomfortable, you can buy a
proprietary license to use dxflib. Since the GPL does not make us
uncomfortable, we will use it under that license. :)

Lifting FE-Legal.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949

Antonio Trande  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)



--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande  ---
We need legal review for this software. Commercial license included:

**
dxflib COMMERCIAL LICENSE AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL EDITIONS
Agreement version 1.2

IMPORTANT-READ CAREFULLY: 
1. This RibbonSoft End-User License Agreement ("Agreement") is a legal
agreement between you (either an individual or a legal entity)
("Licensee") and RibbonSoft GmbH ("RibbonSoft") for the RibbonSoft 
software product(s) accompanying this Agreement, which include(s) 
computer software and may include "online" or electronic documentation,
associated media, and printed materials, including the source code,
example programs and the documentation ("Licensed Software").

2. The Licensed Software is protected by copyright laws and
international copyright treaties, as well as other intellectual
property laws and treaties. The Licensed Software is licensed, not
sold.

3. By installing, copying, or otherwise using the Licensed Software,
Licensee agrees to be bound by the terms of this Agreement. If
Licensee does not agree to the terms of this Agreement, Licensee may
not install, copy, or otherwise use the Licensed Software. 

4. Upon Licensee's acceptance of the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, RibbonSoft grants Licensee the right to use the Licensed
Software in the manner provided below.

5. RibbonSoft grants to Licensee as an individual a royalty-free,
personal, non-exclusive, non-transferable, perpetual license to make 
and use copies of the Licensed Software for the sole purposes of 
designing, developing, and testing Licensee's software product(s)
("Applications"). Licensee may install copies of the Licensed Software
on an unlimited number of computers provided that Licensee is the only
individual using the Licensed Software. If Licensee is an entity,
RibbonSoft grants Licensee the right to designate one, and only one,
individual within Licensee's organization who shall have the sole
right to use the Licensed Software in the manner provided
above. Licensee may at any time, but not more frequently that once
every six (6) months, designate another individual within Licensee's
organization to replace the current designated user by notifying
RibbonSoft, so long as there is no more than one designated user at any
given time.

GENERAL TERMS THAT APPLY TO APPLICATIONS AND REDISTRIBUTABLES
6. RibbonSoft grants Licensee a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to
reproduce and distribute the object code form of certain portions of the
Licensed Software ("Redistributables"), as specified in Appendix 1,
Section 1, for execution on any operating system. Copies of 
Redistributables may only be distributed with and for the sole purpose 
of executing Applications permitted under this Agreement that Licensee 
has created using the Licensed Software. Under no circumstances may any 
copies of Redistributables be distributed separately. This Agreement 
does not give Licensee any rights to distribute any of the parts of 
the Licensed Software listed in Appendix 1, Section 2, neither as a 
whole nor as parts or snippets of code. 

7. The license granted in this Agreement for Licensee to create
Applications and distribute them to Licensee's customers is subject 
to all of the following conditions:
(i) Licensee will indemnify and hold RibbonSoft, its related companies 
and its suppliers, harmless from and against any claims or liabilities 
arising out of the use, reproduction or distribution of Applications; 
(ii) Applications must be developed using a licensed, registered copy 
of the Licensed Software; (iii) Applications must add primary and 
substantial functionality to the Licensed Software; (iv) Applications 
may not pass on functionality which in any way makes it possible for 
others to create software with the Licensed Software; (v) Applications 
may not compete with the Licensed Software; (iv) Licensee may not use 
RibbonSoft's or any of its suppliers' names, logos, or trademarks to 
market Application(s), except to state that Application was developed 
using the Licensed Software.

NOTE: dxflib Open Source Edition is licensed under the terms of the 
GPL and not under this Agreement. If Licensee has, at any time, 
developed all (or any portions of) the Application(s) using RibbonSoft's 
publicly licensed dxflib Open Source Edition, Licensee must comply 
with RibbonSoft's requirements and license such Application(s) 
(or any portions derived there from) under the terms of the Free Software 
Foundation's GNU General Public License version 2 (the "GPL") a copy of 
which is located at 

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949

Antonio Trande  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|anto.tra...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949

srakitnican  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1432983




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432983
[Bug 1432983] Review Request: camotics - Open-Source Simulation & Computer
Aided Machining - A 3-axis CNC GCode simulator
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949

srakitnican  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org