[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed|2017-10-25 19:11:10 |2017-11-15 12:41:04



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-htmlwidgets-0.9-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003
Bug 1493003 depends on bug 1485585, which changed state.

Bug 1485585 Summary: Review Request: R-htmltools - Tools for HTML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485585

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003
Bug 1493003 depends on bug 1489340, which changed state.

Bug 1489340 Summary: Review Request: R-jsonlite - A Robust, High Performance 
JSON Parser and Generator for R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489340

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003
Bug 1493003 depends on bug 1485585, which changed state.

Bug 1485585 Summary: Review Request: R-htmltools - Tools for HTML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485585

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|ERRATA  |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|ERRATA  |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-htmlwidgets-0.9-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-431120137a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-htmlwidgets-0.9-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-431120137a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003
Bug 1493003 depends on bug 1489340, which changed state.

Bug 1489340 Summary: Review Request: R-jsonlite - A Robust, High Performance 
JSON Parser and Generator for R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489340

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|ERRATA  |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-25 19:11:10



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-htmlwidgets-0.9-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-htmlwidgets-0.9-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2cf96c4387

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003
Bug 1493003 depends on bug 1489340, which changed state.

Bug 1489340 Summary: Review Request: R-jsonlite - A Robust, High Performance 
JSON Parser and Generator for R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489340

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003
Bug 1493003 depends on bug 1485585, which changed state.

Bug 1485585 Summary: Review Request: R-htmltools - Tools for HTML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485585

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-htmlwidgets

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
All good, package accepted.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated". 42 files have unknown license. Detailed
 output of licensecheck in

/home/bob/packaging/review/R-htmlwidgets/review-R-htmlwidgets/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.
[x]: Package requires R-core.

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, 

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Wrong tab, sorry

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Hello,

 - Again the large doc should go in a subpackage:

  Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
  (~1MB) or number of files.
  Note: Documentation size is 1761280 bytes in 65 files.
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation

 - The description/summary could be a bit more verbose


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
  (~1MB) or number of files.
  Note: Documentation size is 1761280 bytes in 65 files.
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (unspecified)", "BSD (2 clause)", "Unknown or generated".
 10 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-profunctors/review-ghc-
 profunctors/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File 

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21964354

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493003] Review Request: R-htmlwidgets - HTML Widgets for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493003

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1485585, 1489340, 1484726




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484726
[Bug 1484726] Review Request: R-yaml - Methods to Convert R Data to YAML
and Back
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485585
[Bug 1485585] Review Request: R-htmltools - Tools for HTML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489340
[Bug 1489340] Review Request: R-jsonlite - A Robust, High Performance JSON
Parser and Generator for R
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org