needinfo canceled: [Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Package Review has canceled Package Review 's request for Jared Smith 's needinfo: Bug 1815936: Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 --- Comment #18 from Package Review --- This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 --- Comment #16 from Jared Smith --- No matching package to install: 'db4-cxx-devel' No matching package to install: 'db4-devel' Did you mean libdb4-cxx-devel and libdb4-devel instead? I recommend you test rebuilding your SRPM in mock before posting it here, as that typically exposes a bunch of issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 Daniel Pocock changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(dan...@pocock.com |needinfo- |.au)| --- Comment #15 from Daniel Pocock --- Spec URL: https://fedrtc.org/resiprocate-review/resiprocate.spec SRPM URL: https://fedrtc.org/resiprocate-review/resiprocate-1.12.0-35.src.rpm Description: SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations Fedora Account System Username: pocock Thanks for that patch, I've committed it upstream https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/commit/80684d04d03a2ae4552c4b9b18b5cc94225c7b46 I made the v1.12.0 tag and produced a new SRPM -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(dan...@pocock.com ||.au) --- Comment #14 from Jared Smith --- Daniel, I sent you my changes to PYCONFIG in a private message -- hopefully you've had a chance to review that and can update your spec and SRPM files so that we can continue with the package review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 --- Comment #13 from Daniel Pocock --- The latest spec file and SRPM are on the server The spec file doesn't include your change to PYCONFIG, can you please send it as a pull request or diff, I didn't want to try and guess exactly what you wrote. Spec URL: https://fedrtc.org/resiprocate-review/resiprocate.spec SRPM URL: https://fedrtc.org/resiprocate-review/resiprocate-1.12.0~beta14-35.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 --- Comment #12 from Daniel Pocock --- Hi Jared, I keep a resiprocate.spec.in upstream, would you mind submitting your change as a pull request there? https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate I already put in the other changes. I prefer that people see your name on the commit as we value all contributors. After the effort you put into this Fedora review you are also entitled to add your name to the upstream AUTHORS file but please make that a separate commit. Regards, Daniel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936
--- Comment #11 from Daniel Pocock ---
Sorry, the above example was wrong, it should be
%files libs
%doc COPYING
%{_libdir}/libdum-*.so
%{_libdir}/librepro-*.so
%{_libdir}/libresip-*.so
%if %build_return
%{_libdir}/libreTurnClient-*.so
+%{_libdir}/libreTurnCommon-*.so
%endif
%{_libdir}/librutil-*.so
%{_libdir}/libsipdial-*.so
%files devel
.
%{_libdir}/libresip.so
%if %build_return
%{_libdir}/libreTurnClient.so
+%{_libdir}/libreTurnCommon.so
%endif
%{_libdir}/librutil.so
%{_libdir}/libsipdial.so
Notice it is libreTurnCommon.so, not libreTurnCommon-*.so
I pushed all the latest changes to the spec file in upstream Git
https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Pocock ---
The resiprocate.org server had a crash a few weeks ago, it is very gradually
being restored from backup. I think the older source tarballs are back again
now. My own beta build this week is at this URL:
https://fedrtc.org/resiprocate-review/
The unversioned Obsoletes is fixed in my local copy, I can't push it.
-Obsoletes: resiprocate-b2bua
+Obsoletes: resiprocate-b2bua < 1.9.0
I made the reTurn stuff optional on older systems without asio-1.14.0, so that
part wasn't tested in my own build on EPEL7. I don't have a machine running
rawhide here.
Could you please add them like this. Will it automatically handle the debug
symbols? I don't have anything about *.debug files for any of the other libs.
%files libs
%doc COPYING
%{_libdir}/libdum-*.so
%{_libdir}/librepro-*.so
%{_libdir}/libresip-*.so
%if %build_return
%{_libdir}/libreTurnClient-*.so
+%{_libdir}/libreTurnCommon-*.so
%endif
%{_libdir}/librutil-*.so
%{_libdir}/libsipdial-*.so
%files devel
.
%{_libdir}/libresip.so
%if %build_return
%{_libdir}/libreTurnClient.so
+%{_libdir}/libreTurnCommon-*.so
%endif
%{_libdir}/librutil.so
%{_libdir}/libsipdial.so
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936
--- Comment #9 from Jared Smith ---
OK, making progress.
When building in rawhide (with the PYCONFIG change, as well as the versioned
BuildRequires on asio-devel), I now get the following build errors:
RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libreTurnCommon-1.12.so-1.12.0~beta12-35.fc33.x86_64.debug
/usr/lib64/libreTurnCommon-1.12.so
/usr/lib64/libreTurnCommon.so
line 63: It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes: Obsoletes:
resiprocate-b2bua
I think you just need to add those files to the appropriate %files sections.
Also, just as an FYI, it seems that the source code (%{SOURCE0} in the spec
file) has gone missing from the upstream resiprocate.org website -- luckily I
still had a copy from the last time I looked at the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Pocock --- I'd like to get your PYCONFIG change committed in Git but it doesn't allow push while the package is in the orphaned state. Is there any way around this? As an additional sanity check, can you please edit the line for asio-devel: -BuildRequires: asio-devel +BuildRequires: asio-devel >= 1.12.0 and then rpmbuild will verify that the right asio-devel version is really present. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 Daniel Pocock changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(dan...@pocock.com | |.au)| --- Comment #7 from Daniel Pocock --- When I look at this part of your output: In file included from /usr/include/boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time_types.hpp:16, from /usr/include/asio/time_traits.hpp:23, from /usr/include/asio/deadline_timer_service.hpp:27, from /usr/include/asio/basic_deadline_timer.hpp:25, from /usr/include/asio.hpp:20, from ReTurnConfig.hxx:5, from ReTurnConfig.cxx:16: it looks like asio-1.10.8 In asio-1.14.0, you can see /usr/include/asio/deadline_timer_service.hpp has become: /usr/include/asio/detail/deadline_timer_service.hpp and it doesn't include time_traits.hpp. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(dan...@pocock.com ||.au) --- Comment #6 from Jared Smith --- Still having the same issues on Rawhide: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DRESIP_OSTYPE_LINUX -DRESIP_ARCH_X86_64 -DRESIP_LARCH_ -D_REENTRANT -DRESIP_TOOLCHAIN_GNU -I .. -DASIO_HAS_BOOST_BIND -DBOOST_ASIO_HAS_STD_CHRONO -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -I/usr/include/libdb4 -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -Wall -Wno-deprecated -c -o TlsServer.o TlsServer.cxx In file included from ReTurnConfig.cxx:16: ReTurnConfig.hxx:116:13: error: 'steady_timer' in namespace 'asio' does not name a type 116 | asio::steady_timer mTimer; | ^~~~ ReTurnConfig.cxx:34:22: error: 'chrono' is not a namespace-name 34 | using namespace std::chrono; | ^~ ReTurnConfig.cxx: In constructor 'reTurn::ReTurnUserFileScanner::ReTurnUserFileScanner(asio::io_service&, reTurn::ReTurnConfig&)': ReTurnConfig.cxx:365:4: error: class 'reTurn::ReTurnUserFileScanner' does not have any field named 'mTimer' 365 |mTimer(ioService, seconds(mLoopInterval)) |^~ ReTurnConfig.cxx:365:22: error: 'seconds' was not declared in this scope 365 |mTimer(ioService, seconds(mLoopInterval)) | ^~~ ReTurnConfig.cxx:365:22: note: suggested alternatives: In file included from /usr/include/boost/chrono/chrono.hpp:11, from /usr/include/boost/chrono/include.hpp:15, from /usr/include/boost/chrono.hpp:17, from ReTurnConfig.cxx:14: /usr/include/boost/chrono/duration.hpp:201:44: note: 'boost::chrono::seconds' 201 | typedef duration seconds; // at least 35 bits needed |^~~ In file included from /usr/include/boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time_types.hpp:16, from /usr/include/asio/time_traits.hpp:23, from /usr/include/asio/deadline_timer_service.hpp:27, from /usr/include/asio/basic_deadline_timer.hpp:25, from /usr/include/asio.hpp:20, from ReTurnConfig.hxx:5, from ReTurnConfig.cxx:16: /usr/include/boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time_duration.hpp:53:30: note: 'boost::posix_time::seconds' 53 | class BOOST_SYMBOL_VISIBLE seconds : public time_duration | ^~~ ReTurnConfig.cxx: In member function 'void reTurn::ReTurnUserFileScanner::start()': ReTurnConfig.cxx:383:7: error: 'mTimer' was not declared in this scope 383 | mTimer.expires_from_now(seconds(timerInterval)); | ^~ ReTurnConfig.cxx:383:31: error: 'seconds' was not declared in this scope 383 | mTimer.expires_from_now(seconds(timerInterval)); | ^~~ ReTurnConfig.cxx:383:31: note: suggested alternatives: In file included from /usr/include/boost/chrono/chrono.hpp:11, from /usr/include/boost/chrono/include.hpp:15, from /usr/include/boost/chrono.hpp:17, from ReTurnConfig.cxx:14: /usr/include/boost/chrono/duration.hpp:201:44: note: 'boost::chrono::seconds' 201 | typedef duration seconds; // at least 35 bits needed |^~~ In file included from /usr/include/boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time_types.hpp:16, from /usr/include/asio/time_traits.hpp:23, from /usr/include/asio/deadline_timer_service.hpp:27, from /usr/include/asio/basic_deadline_timer.hpp:25, from /usr/include/asio.hpp:20, from ReTurnConfig.hxx:5, from ReTurnConfig.cxx:16: /usr/include/boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time_duration.hpp:53:30: note: 'boost::posix_time::seconds' 53 | class BOOST_SYMBOL_VISIBLE seconds : public time_duration | ^~~ In file included from TurnManager.hxx:9, from RequestHandler.hxx:10, from TcpConnection.hxx:11, from TcpServer.hxx:10, from TcpServer.cxx:1: ReTurnConfig.hxx:116:13: error: 'steady_timer' in namespace 'asio' does not name a type 116 | asio::steady_timer mTimer; | ^~~~ In file included from TurnManager
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 Daniel Pocock changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(dan...@pocock.com |needinfo- |.au)| --- Comment #5 from Daniel Pocock --- Thanks for looking at this. To resolve those errors, you need a buildroot override to get asio-1.14.0, see my earlier comments about asio The asio-1.10.x RPM in Fedora will generate errors like that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 --- Comment #4 from Jared Smith --- Sorry, my apologies -- the test above was on Fedora 32. Trying on Rawhide now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(dan...@pocock.com ||.au) --- Comment #3 from Jared Smith --- I tried building this in Rawhide, but wasn't successful. The first issue I ran into was that on line 168 of your spec file, you have PYCONFIG hard-coded to /usr/bin/python3.7-config, where in Fedora the python3-devel package provides /usr/bin/python3-config and /usr/bin/python-config. Once I changed that, I ran into the following issue during compilation: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DRESIP_OSTYPE_LINUX -DRESIP_ARCH_X86_64 -DRESIP_LARCH_ -D_REENTRANT -DRESIP_TOOLCHAIN_GNU -I .. -DASIO_HAS_BOOST_BIND -DBOOST_ASIO_HAS_STD_CHRONO -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -I/usr/include/libdb4 -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -Wall -Wno-deprecated -c -o TlsServer.o TlsServer.cxx In file included from ReTurnConfig.cxx:16: ReTurnConfig.hxx:116:13: error: 'steady_timer' in namespace 'asio' does not name a type 116 | asio::steady_timer mTimer; | ^~~~ ReTurnConfig.cxx:34:22: error: 'chrono' is not a namespace-name 34 | using namespace std::chrono; | ^~ ReTurnConfig.cxx: In constructor 'reTurn::ReTurnUserFileScanner::ReTurnUserFileScanner(asio::io_service&, reTurn::ReTurnConfig&)': ReTurnConfig.cxx:365:4: error: class 'reTurn::ReTurnUserFileScanner' does not have any field named 'mTimer' 365 |mTimer(ioService, seconds(mLoopInterval)) |^~ ReTurnConfig.cxx:365:22: error: 'seconds' was not declared in this scope 365 |mTimer(ioService, seconds(mLoopInterval)) | ^~~ ReTurnConfig.cxx:365:22: note: suggested alternatives: In file included from /usr/include/boost/chrono/chrono.hpp:11, from /usr/include/boost/chrono/include.hpp:15, from /usr/include/boost/chrono.hpp:17, from ReTurnConfig.cxx:14: /usr/include/boost/chrono/duration.hpp:201:44: note: 'boost::chrono::seconds' 201 | typedef duration seconds; // at least 35 bits needed |^~~ In file included from /usr/include/boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time_types.hpp:16, from /usr/include/asio/time_traits.hpp:23, from /usr/include/asio/deadline_timer_service.hpp:27, from /usr/include/asio/basic_deadline_timer.hpp:25, from /usr/include/asio.hpp:20, from ReTurnConfig.hxx:5, from ReTurnConfig.cxx:16: /usr/include/boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time_duration.hpp:53:30: note: 'boost::posix_time::seconds' 53 | class BOOST_SYMBOL_VISIBLE seconds : public time_duration | ^~~ ReTurnConfig.cxx: In member function 'void reTurn::ReTurnUserFileScanner::start()': ReTurnConfig.cxx:383:7: error: 'mTimer' was not declared in this scope 383 | mTimer.expires_from_now(seconds(timerInterval)); | ^~ ReTurnConfig.cxx:383:31: error: 'seconds' was not declared in this scope 383 | mTimer.expires_from_now(seconds(timerInterval)); | ^~~ ReTurnConfig.cxx:383:31: note: suggested alternatives: In file included from /usr/include/boost/chrono/chrono.hpp:11, from /usr/include/boost/chrono/include.hpp:15, from /usr/include/boost/chrono.hpp:17, from ReTurnConfig.cxx:14: /usr/include/boost/chrono/duration.hpp:201:44: note: 'boost::chrono::seconds' 201 | typedef duration seconds; // at least 35 bits needed |^~~ In file included from /usr/include/boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time_types.hpp:16, from /usr/include/asio/time_traits.hpp:23, from /usr/include/asio/deadline_timer_service.hpp:27, from /usr/include/asio/basic_deadline_timer.hpp:25, from /usr/include/asio.hpp:20, from ReTurnConfig.hxx:5, from ReTurnConfig.cxx:16: /usr/include/boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time_duration.hpp:53:30: note: 'boost::posix_time::seconds' 53 | class BOOST_SYMBOL_VISIBLE seconds : public time_duration | ^~~ In file included from TurnManager.hxx:9, from RequestHandler.hxx:10,
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Pocock --- This release is tagged as a beta pending any feedback from the Fedora review. When it is accepted in Fedora I'll tag 1.12.0 upstream. If any changes are required upstream, I'll commit them before the final 1.12.0 tag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815936] Review Request: reSIProcate - SIP and TURN stacks, with SIP proxy and TURN server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 Daniel Pocock changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Daniel Pocock --- This depends on asio 1.12.2 or greater. I built asio 1.14.0 in rawhide https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1a78b8bb5d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
