[Bug 1862798] Review Request: rust-parsec-client - Parsec Client library for the Rust ecosystem

2020-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862798

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-09-20 10:40:17




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862798] Review Request: rust-parsec-client - Parsec Client library for the Rust ecosystem

2020-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862798
Bug 1862798 depends on bug 1862796, which changed state.

Bug 1862796 Summary: Review Request: rust-parsec-interface - Parsec interface 
library to communicate using the wire protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862796

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862798] Review Request: rust-parsec-client - Parsec Client library for the Rust ecosystem

2020-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862798



--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-parsec-client


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862798] Review Request: rust-parsec-client - Parsec Client library for the Rust ecosystem

2020-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862798

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Jared Smith  ---
Package is APPROVED.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0",
 "Apache License 2.0". 19 files have unknown license. Detailed output
 of licensecheck in /tmp/1862798-rust-parsec-client/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
 parsec-client-devel , rust-parsec-client+default-devel , rust-parsec-
 client+no-fs-permission-check-devel , rust-parsec-client+testing-devel
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
 publishes signatures.
 Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that 

[Bug 1862798] Review Request: rust-parsec-client - Parsec Client library for the Rust ecosystem

2020-09-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862798

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1877893 (dbus-parsec)





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877893
[Bug 1877893] Review Request: dbus-parsec - DBus PARSEC interface
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862798] Review Request: rust-parsec-client - Parsec Client library for the Rust ecosystem

2020-09-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862798



--- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson  ---
SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rust-parsec-client.spec
SRPM:
https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rust-parsec-client-0.9.0-2.fc32.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862798] Review Request: rust-parsec-client - Parsec Client library for the Rust ecosystem

2020-09-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862798



--- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson  ---
SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rust-parsec-client.spec
SRPM:
https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rust-parsec-client-0.9.0-1.fc32.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862798] Review Request: rust-parsec-client - Parsec Client library for the Rust ecosystem

2020-09-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862798

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862798] Review Request: rust-parsec-client - Parsec Client library for the Rust ecosystem

2020-08-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862798

Robert-André Mauchin   changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||zebo...@gmail.com



--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin   ---
 - You need to specify what you have changed with the fix-metadata.diff patch
and add the PR you created for it:

# Initial patched metadata
# - Bump num to 0.4.0 https:// ...
Patch0: parsec-client-fix-metadata.diff

 - Missing deps:

DEBUG util.py:621:  Error: 
DEBUG util.py:621:   Problem: nothing provides requested
(crate(mockstream/default) >= 0.0.3 with crate(mockstream/default) < 0.0.4)
DEBUG util.py:623:  (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages
or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

Please fill a new Review Request for this package.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862798] Review Request: rust-parsec-client - Parsec Client library for the Rust ecosystem

2020-08-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862798



--- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson  ---
SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rust-parsec-client.spec
SRPM:
https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rust-parsec-client-0.8.0-1.fc32.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862798] Review Request: rust-parsec-client - Parsec Client library for the Rust ecosystem

2020-08-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862798
Bug 1862798 depends on bug 1862782, which changed state.

Bug 1862782 Summary: Review Request: rust-derivative - Set of alternative 
`derive` attributes for Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862782

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862798] Review Request: rust-parsec-client - Parsec Client library for the Rust ecosystem

2020-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862798

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1859994 (PARSEC)
 Depends On||1862796
   ||(rust-parsec-interface),
   ||1862782 (rust-derivative)
  Alias||rust-parsec-client
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859994
[Bug 1859994] Support PARSEC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862782
[Bug 1862782] Review Request: rust-derivative - Set of alternative `derive`
attributes for Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862796
[Bug 1862796] Review Request: rust-parsec-interface - Parsec interface library
to communicate using the wire protocol
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org