[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-09-28 00:14:57 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-b06485eb36 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-b06485eb36 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-b06485eb36 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b06485eb36 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-b06485eb36 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b06485eb36 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST --- Comment #14 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Thanks very much. SCM requested now :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 Charalampos Stratakis changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Charalampos Stratakis --- Great, everything looks good :) Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 --- Comment #12 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Their license file seems to be out of date. I ran their commands and came up with the same licenses that I had manually populated: $ npx license-checker --production --csv "module name","license","repository" "@bokeh/bokehjs@2.2.1","BSD-3-Clause","https://github.com/bokeh/bokeh"; "@bokeh/numbro@1.6.2","MIT","https://github.com/foretagsplatsen/numbro"; "@bokeh/slickgrid@2.4.2701","MIT","https://github.com/bokeh/SlickGrid"; "@types/jquery@3.5.1","MIT","https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped"; "@types/sizzle@2.3.2","MIT","https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped"; "@types/slickgrid@2.1.30","MIT","https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped"; "choices.js@9.0.1","MIT","https://github.com/jshjohnson/Choices"; "d@1.0.1","ISC","https://github.com/medikoo/d"; "deepmerge@4.2.2","MIT","https://github.com/TehShrike/deepmerge"; "es5-ext@0.10.53","ISC","https://github.com/medikoo/es5-ext"; "es6-iterator@2.0.3","MIT","https://github.com/medikoo/es6-iterator"; "es6-map@0.1.5","MIT","https://github.com/medikoo/es6-map"; "es6-promise@4.2.8","MIT","https://github.com/stefanpenner/es6-promise"; "es6-set@0.1.5","MIT","https://github.com/medikoo/es6-set"; "es6-symbol@3.1.1","MIT","https://github.com/medikoo/es6-symbol"; "es6-symbol@3.1.3","ISC","https://github.com/medikoo/es6-symbol"; "es6-weak-map@2.0.3","ISC","https://github.com/medikoo/es6-weak-map"; "event-emitter@0.3.5","MIT","https://github.com/medikoo/event-emitter"; "ext@1.4.0","ISC","https://github.com/medikoo/es5-ext/tree/ext"; "flatbush@3.3.0","ISC","https://github.com/mourner/flatbush"; "flatpickr@4.6.3","MIT","https://github.com/chmln/flatpickr"; "flatqueue@1.2.1","ISC","https://github.com/mourner/flatqueue"; "fuse.js@3.6.1","Apache-2.0","https://github.com/krisk/Fuse"; "hammerjs@2.0.8","MIT","https://github.com/hammerjs/hammer.js"; "jquery-ui@1.12.1","MIT","https://github.com/jquery/jquery-ui"; "jquery@3.5.1","MIT","https://github.com/jquery/jquery"; "js-tokens@4.0.0","MIT","https://github.com/lydell/js-tokens"; "loose-envify@1.4.0","MIT","https://github.com/zertosh/loose-envify"; "mgrs@1.0.0","MIT","https://github.com/proj4js/mgrs"; "next-tick@1.0.0","MIT","https://github.com/medikoo/next-tick"; "nouislider@14.6.0","MIT","https://github.com/leongersen/noUiSlider"; "proj4@2.6.2","MIT","https://github.com/proj4js/proj4js"; "redux@4.0.5","MIT","https://github.com/reduxjs/redux"; "sprintf-js@1.1.2","BSD-3-Clause","https://github.com/alexei/sprintf.js"; "symbol-observable@1.2.0","MIT","https://github.com/blesh/symbol-observable"; "timezone@1.0.23","MIT","https://github.com/bigeasy/timezone"; "tslib@1.13.0","0BSD","https://github.com/Microsoft/tslib"; "type@1.2.0","ISC","https://github.com/medikoo/type"; "type@2.0.0","ISC","https://github.com/medikoo/type"; "underscore.template@0.1.7","MIT","https://github.com/superRaytin/underscore.template"; "wkt-parser@1.2.4","MIT","https://github.com/proj4js/wkt-parser"; I've updated the spec/srpm: * Fri Sep 18 2020 Ankur Sinha - 2.2.1-3 - Update naming scheme for bundled bits, also in script - Comment use of parse script - Correct parse script shebang Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-bokeh/python-bokeh.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-bokeh/python-bokeh-2.2.1-3.fc32.src.rpm Cheers! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 --- Comment #11 from Charalampos Stratakis --- So e.g. the line "Provides: bundled(npm(redux)) = 4.0.5" should be changed to "Provides: bundled(nodejs-redux) = 4.0.5". You might want to adapt your python script for it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 --- Comment #10 from Charalampos Stratakis --- Ah and another thing. According to the bundling guidelines, the bundled provides naming scheme should be of the form, as if the bundled library would enter the distro as a normal package. See: http://docs.horsefunerals.co.uk/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling and http://docs.horsefunerals.co.uk/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Node.js/#_naming_guidelines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 --- Comment #9 from Charalampos Stratakis --- Thank you for the changes. That's a great licensing breakdown. Some more recommendations on that. I didn't go through the bundled code, however within https://github.com/bokeh/bokeh/blob/branch-2.3/bokehjs/LICENSE there is a breakdown of the licenses within the bundled software, so on the license field you'll need to add AFL and Unlicense and WTFPL (unless upstream has removed the software with those licenses and forgot to update the info). Also could you provide a comment in the SPEC for the parse-deps.py script on its purpose and usage? It can be obvious by reading the code, but an explanation comment would be quite useful. Also the shebang of the script should be changed to /usr/bin/python3 instead of the env variant. The rest look great. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Hello, I updated the spec: * Thu Sep 17 2020 Ankur Sinha - 2.2.1-2 - Include detailed licensing - Add optional requirements - Remove commented shebang correction command - List bundled nodejs libs with licenses - include parse script in srpm - Remove zero length files The primary use case for bokeh is to be used as a python module, so I haven't changed the name of the package. Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-bokeh/python-bokeh.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-bokeh/python-bokeh-2.2.1-2.fc32.src.rpm Cheers! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291
--- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to Charalampos Stratakis from comment #6)
> >
> [?]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
>
> There are some files with which have a license somewhere in the middle and
> they mention other libraries there. For example on
> bokeh/server/static/js/bokeh-widgets.legacy.js I see:
>
> 535: /* flatpickr/dist/flatpickr.js */ function _(require, module, exports) {
> /* flatpickr v4.6.3, @license MIT */
>
> I am not very familiar with javascript code. Would flatpickr in this case be
> considered a bundled library?
>
Thanks Charalampos.
I'll have to check on this too. From the looks of it, the pypi tar includes the
built version of bokehjs, which bundles a bunch of node js libraries. These are
included here in the package-lock.json file (the ones that aren't dev ones are
what I'll have to look at):
https://github.com/bokeh/bokeh/blob/0b9526ef553d938bf5de187e2511564c648c13bd/bokehjs/package-lock.json
This is the whole dep tree, though. So are we required to include all of these
as bundled(...), or do we grep the sources to see which of these are actually
bundled and only include those? I think the latter perhaps, but js files are
notoriously hard to go through. I'll go enquire on the -devel list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291
--- Comment #6 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License", "*No copyright* BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License",
"Apache License (v2.0)", "Expat License BSD 3-clause "New" or
"Revised" License", "Expat License Apache License (v2.0)", "Expat
License". 1463 files have unknown license.
[X]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
Nitpick here: Licensing breakdown could be more specific.
[?]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
There are some files with which have a license somewhere in the middle and they
mention other libraries there. For example on
bokeh/server/static/js/bokeh-widgets.legacy.js I see:
535: /* flatpickr/dist/flatpickr.js */ function _(require, module, exports) {
/* flatpickr v4.6.3, @license MIT */
I am not very familiar with javascript code. Would flatpickr in this case be
considered a bundled library?
[X]: Changelog in prescribed format.
Nitpick: Increment the release or place the second changelog entry within the
first. It's more for consistency and not having two changelog entries with the
same version/release. But this is more of a cosmetic change, not a blocker.
[X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[?]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
The package provides a binary as well. If its primary purpose is to utilize the
binary and use the package as an application, then the name 'bokeh' instead of
'python-bokeh' would be more appropriate. If its main purpose is to be used as
a library then it would be the other way around. What would be then its primary
usage?
[X]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[X]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[X]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[X]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[X]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[X]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[X]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[X]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[X]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-deve
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Thanks for the comments, Charalampos. I've made the suggested changes now. Turns out some of the deps aren't up to date enough in F32, so bokeh can't be used on Fedora <= 32. * Wed Sep 16 2020 Ankur Sinha - 2.2.1-1 - Remove dependency generator: no longer needed since F30 - Remove python provide line: no longer needed for F33+ Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-bokeh/python-bokeh.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-bokeh/python-bokeh-2.2.1-1.fc32.src.rpm Since all members of the Neuro SIG need to be able to work with our specs, I'd prefer to hold off on using the pyproject-rpm macros until they're in the packaging guidelines. (I've used them in projects that use the pyproject.toml specification but there it was necessary to do so). Cheers, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 --- Comment #4 from Charalampos Stratakis --- You can use the pyproject-rpm-macros to simplify the SPEC a lot, assuming that the upstream metadata is correct. Could you take a look at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros/blob/master/f/README.md ? Here is an example of a SPEC conversion: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-more-itertools/pull-request/7#request_diff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291
--- Comment #3 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
The %{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{pypi_name}} macro can be
removed if the package is intended only for rawhide and/or F33. It's still
required for Fedora <= 32.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291
--- Comment #2 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
%{?python_enable_dependency_generator} can be removed as it's enabled by
default since Fedora 30
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 Charalampos Stratakis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cstra...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cstra...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Charalampos Stratakis --- Will review this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro) Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
