[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-d78f66a05a has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-7ce8f17663 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-b7dd117ec2 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review+  |fedora-review-



--- Comment #15 from Petr Pisar  ---
This package does not meet Fedora packaging guidelines, because the
"Semi-Permissive" license identifier is not on the Fedora licensing list
.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-d78f66a05a has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-d78f66a05a \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d78f66a05a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-7ce8f17663 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-7ce8f17663 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7ce8f17663

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-b7dd117ec2 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-b7dd117ec2 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b7dd117ec2

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-7ce8f17663 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7ce8f17663


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-d78f66a05a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d78f66a05a


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-b7dd117ec2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b7dd117ec2


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370

Jaroslav Škarvada  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2020-10-02 19:40:41




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370



--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wwl


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370



--- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Škarvada  ---
Thanks.(In reply to aegorenk from comment #6)
> Approved.

Thanks.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370

aegor...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from aegor...@redhat.com ---
Approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370

Jaroslav Škarvada  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c |
   |om) |



--- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Škarvada  ---
(In reply to aegorenk from comment #4)
Thanks for the review.

> Notes:
> 
> - [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
>   file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
> 
>   I think it's fine in this case since there is only one source file, which
> contains license information.
> 
> - Please pay attention to rpmlint output.
> 
>   wwl.x86_64: W: invalid-license Semi-Permissive
>   should be fine
>
I am ready to rename the license if the fedora-legal will come up with some
different name.

>   wwl.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/wwl.1.gz
>   should be fixed
>
It should be fixed now.

>   wwl.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hamradio -> ham radio,
> ham-radio, radiogram
>   should be fine if you think this is the correct way to spell it
>
Fixed. I took the original description from the upstream, I think "ham radio"
is better.

>   (none): E: no installed packages by name wwl
>   Not sure about this one. Rather looks like the fedora-review tool problem
> than the package itself
>
Probably.

Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/wwl/wwl.spec
SRPM URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/wwl/wwl-1.3-2.fc31.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370

aegor...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c
   ||om)



--- Comment #4 from aegor...@redhat.com ---
Notes:

- [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
  file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.

  I think it's fine in this case since there is only one source file, which
contains license information.

- Please pay attention to rpmlint output.

  wwl.x86_64: W: invalid-license Semi-Permissive
  should be fine

  wwl.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/wwl.1.gz
  should be fixed

  wwl.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hamradio -> ham radio,
ham-radio, radiogram
  should be fine if you think this is the correct way to spell it

  (none): E: no installed packages by name wwl
  Not sure about this one. Rather looks like the fedora-review tool problem
than the package itself


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370



--- Comment #3 from aegor...@redhat.com ---
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such
  a list, create one.
- Add your own remarks to the template checks.
- Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not
  listed by fedora-review.
- Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this
  case you could also file a bug against fedora-review
- Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines
  in what you paste.
- Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint
  ones are mandatory, though)
- Remove this text



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
 BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed
 output of licensecheck in
 /home/eam/workspace/wwl/bz1881370/wwl/licensecheck.txt
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include li

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370

aegor...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||aegor...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|aegor...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370



--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar  ---
I can see the discussion on the list now. (I experiences an hickup in the JS
fetch). It would be great if rfontana updated the list of the approved
licenses.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881370] Review Request: wwl - Calculates distance and azimuth between two Maidenhead locators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ppi...@redhat.com



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
I cannot see license identified listed on
. Also it seems there is no
reply on the legal list. Is this package ready for the review?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org