[Bug 188380] Review Request: perl-Test-Deep
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188380 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-18 19:24:00 EST --- perl-Test-Deep-0.096-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 188380] Review Request: perl-Test-Deep
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188380 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-03 13:19:09 EST --- perl-Test-Deep-0.096-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Deep-0.096-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 188380] Review Request: perl-Test-Deep
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188380 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel-list@redh ||at.com, p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2011-01-18 05:38:45 EST --- Hi Steve, I see that there are existing EL-4 branches for perl-Test-Deep and its dependency perl-Test-NoWarnings but they haven't been built. I've tried building the packages in mock as they stand and they build OK, so is there some reason why they're not built for EPEL-4? If you're no longer interested in EPEL-4 I'll happily take those branches off your hands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 188380] Review Request: perl-Test-Deep
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188380 --- Comment #4 from Steven Pritchard st...@silug.org 2011-01-18 14:53:31 EST --- I had my packages mass-branched for EPEL when it started. I think there are still a lot of my packages that haven't been built for whatever reason. If you want to build those, go for it. (If you want to add yourself to those branches in pkgdb, go for it, but I'll watch for bugs either way.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
