[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-12-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-09d5da6037 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-326af6df23 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-11-21 03:10:20



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-89c027515c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-09d5da6037 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-09d5da6037

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-326af6df23 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-326af6df23 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-326af6df23

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-89c027515c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-89c027515c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-89c027515c has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-89c027515c

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-09d5da6037 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-09d5da6037

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-326af6df23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-326af6df23


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-89c027515c has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-89c027515c

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-09d5da6037 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-09d5da6037


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-89c027515c has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-89c027515c


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756



--- Comment #8 from Steve Traylen  ---
Thankyou for the review,

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/30755


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756

Germano Massullo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #7 from Germano Massullo  ---
Package approved. Please use the following spec and srpm files since I made
some minor changes

https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/python-managesieve/python-managesieve.spec
https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/python-managesieve/python-managesieve-0.6-3.fc33.src.rpm


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Python Software
 Foundation License GNU General Public License". 27 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/user/rpmbuild/python-managesieve/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query 

[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756



--- Comment #6 from Germano Massullo  ---
I am investigating how to deal with Multiple Licensing Scenarios like this one:

Copyright and License
~~

:Copyright: (C) 2003-2018 by Hartmut Goebel 

:License for `managesieve`:
   `Python Software Foundation License
   `_

:License for 'sieveshell' and test suite: `GPL v3
   `_


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756

Ben Cotton  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bcot...@redhat.com




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756



--- Comment #5 from Germano Massullo  ---
I am experiencing some technical difficulties not related to this review.
Meanwhile can you apply theid edit to the spec file? Thank you

--- python-managesieve.spec 2020-11-11 16:06:38.0 +0100
+++ python-managesieve_mio.spec 2020-11-11 19:01:16.004772446 +0100
@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@
 %install
 %py3_install

+%check
+%{python3} setup.py test
+
 %files -n python3-%{pypi_name}
 %doc README.txt
 %{_bindir}/sieveshell
@@ -39,8 +42,6 @@
 %{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}.py*
 %{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-info/

-%check
-%{python3} setup.py test

 %changelog
 * Wed Nov 11 2020 Steve Traylen  - 0.6-2


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756



--- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen  ---
Spec URL:
http://straylen.web.cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-managesieve/python-managesieve.spec
SRPM URL:
http://straylen.web.cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-managesieve/python-managesieve-0.6-2.fc32.src.rpm

all changes applied.

Apologies for the extra BR , lack of mock build.

Steve.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756

Miro Hrončok  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mhron...@redhat.com



--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok  ---
Just came here to say that on this line:

%{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info


The ?.? glob will now work with Python 3.10. Please, don't use that glob.
Either relax the glob:


%{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}-py*.egg-info/


Or use a macro:


%{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-info/


Thanks!

(Note that I've also added a trailing slash. That is useful with any directory
- it asserts the directory stays a directory.)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756



--- Comment #2 from Germano Massullo  ---
Could you please add
BuildRequires:  python3-pytest-runner

otherwise the build will fail with following errors


Mock Version: 2.6
Mock Version: 2.6
Mock Version: 2.6
ENTER ['do_with_status'](['bash', '--login', '-c', '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bs
--target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/python-managesieve.spec'],
chrootPath='/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root'env={'TERM': 'vt100',
'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH':
'/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf
"\\033]0;\\007"', 'PS1': ' \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG':
'C.UTF-8'}shell=Falselogger=timeout=0uid=1000gid=135user='mockbuild'nspawn_args=['--capability=cap_ipc_lock',
'--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.px809acg:/etc/resolv.conf',
'--bind=/dev/btrfs-control', '--bind=/dev/loop-control', '--bind=/dev/loop0',
'--bind=/dev/loop1', '--bind=/dev/loop2', '--bind=/dev/loop3',
'--bind=/dev/loop4', '--bind=/dev/loop5', '--bind=/dev/loop6',
'--bind=/dev/loop7', '--bind=/dev/loop8', '--bind=/dev/loop9',
'--bind=/dev/loop10', '--bind=/dev/loop11']unshare_net=TrueprintOutput=False)
Using nspawn with args ['--capability=cap_ipc_lock',
'--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.px809acg:/etc/resolv.conf',
'--bind=/dev/btrfs-control', '--bind=/dev/loop-control', '--bind=/dev/loop0',
'--bind=/dev/loop1', '--bind=/dev/loop2', '--bind=/dev/loop3',
'--bind=/dev/loop4', '--bind=/dev/loop5', '--bind=/dev/loop6',
'--bind=/dev/loop7', '--bind=/dev/loop8', '--bind=/dev/loop9',
'--bind=/dev/loop10', '--bind=/dev/loop11']
Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q', '-M',
'e503ff980b144a629baa1d4a0e300473', '-D',
'/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root', '-a', '-u', 'mockbuild',
'--capability=cap_ipc_lock',
'--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.px809acg:/etc/resolv.conf',
'--bind=/dev/btrfs-control', '--bind=/dev/loop-control', '--bind=/dev/loop0',
'--bind=/dev/loop1', '--bind=/dev/loop2', '--bind=/dev/loop3',
'--bind=/dev/loop4', '--bind=/dev/loop5', '--bind=/dev/loop6',
'--bind=/dev/loop7', '--bind=/dev/loop8', '--bind=/dev/loop9',
'--bind=/dev/loop10', '--bind=/dev/loop11', '--console=pipe',
'--setenv=TERM=vt100', '--setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash', '--setenv=HOME=/builddir',
'--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock', '--setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin',
'--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;\\007"',
'--setenv=PS1= \\s-\\v\\$ ', '--setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8',
'--resolv-conf=off', 'bash', '--login', '-c', '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bs --target
x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/python-managesieve.spec'] with env
{'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME':
'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf
"\\033]0;\\007"', 'PS1': ' \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG':
'C.UTF-8', 'SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP': '0'} and shell False
Building target platforms: x86_64
Building for target x86_64
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1603929600
Wrote: /builddir/build/SRPMS/python-managesieve-0.6-1.fc34.src.rpm
Child return code was: 0
ENTER ['do_with_status'](['bash', '--login', '-c', '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb
--target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/python-managesieve.spec'],
chrootPath='/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root'env={'TERM': 'vt100',
'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH':
'/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf
"\\033]0;\\007"', 'PS1': ' \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG':
'C.UTF-8'}shell=Falselogger=timeout=0uid=1000gid=135user='mockbuild'nspawn_args=['--capability=cap_ipc_lock',
'--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.px809acg:/etc/resolv.conf',
'--bind=/dev/btrfs-control', '--bind=/dev/loop-control', '--bind=/dev/loop0',
'--bind=/dev/loop1', '--bind=/dev/loop2', '--bind=/dev/loop3',
'--bind=/dev/loop4', '--bind=/dev/loop5', '--bind=/dev/loop6',
'--bind=/dev/loop7', '--bind=/dev/loop8', '--bind=/dev/loop9',
'--bind=/dev/loop10', '--bind=/dev/loop11']unshare_net=TrueprintOutput=False)
Using nspawn with args ['--capability=cap_ipc_lock',
'--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.px809acg:/etc/resolv.conf',
'--bind=/dev/btrfs-control', '--bind=/dev/loop-control', '--bind=/dev/loop0',
'--bind=/dev/loop1', '--bind=/dev/loop2', '--bind=/dev/loop3',
'--bind=/dev/loop4', '--bind=/dev/loop5', '--bind=/dev/loop6',
'--bind=/dev/loop7', '--bind=/dev/loop8', '--bind=/dev/loop9',
'--bind=/dev/loop10', '--bind=/dev/loop11']
Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q', '-M',
'8ef4e03cf2d74803b67885725037bb7a', '-D',
'/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root', '-a', '-u', 'mockbuild',
'--capability=cap_ipc_lock',
'--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.px809acg:/etc/resolv.conf',
'--bind=/dev/btrfs-control', '--bind=/dev/loop-control', '--bind=/dev/loop0',
'--bind=/dev/loop1', '--bind=/dev/loop2', '--bind=/dev/loop3',
'--bind=/dev/loop4', '--bind=/dev/loop5', '--bind=/dev/loop6',
'--bind=/dev/loop7', '--bind=/dev/loop8', '--bind=/dev/loop9',
'--bind=/dev/loop10', '--bind=/dev/loop11', '--console=pipe',
'--setenv=TERM=vt100', '--setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash', '--setenv=HOME

[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756



--- Comment #1 from Germano Massullo  ---
(In reply to Steve Traylen from comment #0)
> No license file is present however I have submitted
> https://gitlab.com/htgoebel/managesieve/-/issues/4
> to request it.

According to pacakge guidelines, let's wait for a response from upstream


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts

2020-11-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756

Germano Massullo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|germano.massu...@gmail.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org