[Bug 1912120] Review Request: imhex - Hex editor for reverse engineering

2021-06-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912120

Otto Urpelainen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response
should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1912120] Review Request: imhex - Hex editor for reverse engineering

2021-06-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912120

Artur Frenszek-Iwicki  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
  Flags|needinfo?(fed...@svgames.pl |
   |)   |
Last Closed||2021-06-28 11:45:21



--- Comment #7 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki  ---
Unfortunately I haven't really touched on this since our last exchange.

I'll close this in case someone else wants to have a go, so they won't be
blocked by the "no duplicate requests" policy.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1912120] Review Request: imhex - Hex editor for reverse engineering

2021-06-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912120

Ben Beasley  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(fed...@svgames.pl
   ||)



--- Comment #6 from Ben Beasley  ---
Just checking if you are still working on this or not…


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1912120] Review Request: imhex - Hex editor for reverse engineering

2021-04-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912120

Artur Frenszek-Iwicki  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(fed...@svgames.pl |
   |)   |



--- Comment #5 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki  ---
> I can probably help you figure out how to deal with the RPATH issues
Much appreciated.

> correctly dealing with the bundled dependencies
Some CMake help may also be needed.

> writing the desktop/AppData files
No biggie.

> if you are having second thoughts and don’t want to finish the work needed 
> for this package
Not guaranteeing that I'm gonna see this through, though the program seems
interesting enough to me that I'd like to give it one more go.
Worst case scenario we'll end up with a bunch of patches that, hopefully, will
be of interest to upstream.

I'll start with un-bundling new libraries introduced since 1.5.0 and let you
know about progress.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1912120] Review Request: imhex - Hex editor for reverse engineering

2021-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912120

Ben Beasley  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(fed...@svgames.pl
   ||)



--- Comment #4 from Ben Beasley  ---
RPATH is a path for finding shared libraries, hard-coded into the executable
instead of picked up from the environment. We usually have to remove these or
prevent their creation in Fedora, but they can be acceptable for internal
libraries like plugins
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_rpath_for_internal_libraries),
which at a glance is likely the case here. However, the build is setting RPATHs
that are totally wrong, since they refer to the build environment. They will
probably need to be adjusted with chrpath.

I can probably help you figure out how to deal with the RPATH issues, if you
are willing to work through them along with correctly dealing with the bundled
dependencies, writing the desktop/AppData files, and any other issues. For
example, based on the README at https://github.com/WerWolv/ImHex#linux, there
are likely a lot more files that need to be manually installed.

On the other hand, if you are having second thoughts and don’t want to finish
the work needed for this package, you can say so and close this bug as WONTFIX,
and that’s just fine too.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1912120] Review Request: imhex - Hex editor for reverse engineering

2021-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912120

Artur Frenszek-Iwicki  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(fed...@svgames.pl |
   |)   |



--- Comment #3 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki  ---
>Since this is a GUI application, you need a desktop file [...] also an AppData 
>XML file [...]
Sure.

>When ignoring format-security warnings, you should comment on whether you 
>think they are spurious, and if not, why not. Or, report them upstream and let 
>upstream decide, and link the bug report.
This has been fixed since, 1.7.0 does not require the patch.

>Do you still intend to complete the package?
I tried updating to 1.7.0 and building that fails because of RPATH issues. I
have exactly zero knowledge of how RPATH works, so unless upstream fixes this
on their side, I don't really see myself pushing this forward.

ERROR   0002: file '/usr/bin/imhex' contains an invalid rpath
'/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex'
in
[/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex:/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex/external/ImGui:/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex/external/ImGui/external/glad:]
ERROR   0002: file '/usr/bin/imhex' contains an invalid rpath
'/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex/external/ImGui'
in
[/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex:/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex/external/ImGui:/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex/external/ImGui/external/glad:]
ERROR   0002: file '/usr/bin/imhex' contains an invalid rpath
'/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex/external/ImGui/external/glad'
in
[/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex:/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex/external/ImGui:/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex/external/ImGui/external/glad:]
ERROR   0010: file '/usr/bin/imhex' contains an empty rpath in
[/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex:/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex/external/ImGui:/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/ImHex-1.7.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/libimhex/external/ImGui/external/glad:]


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1912120] Review Request: imhex - Hex editor for reverse engineering

2021-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912120

Otto Urpelainen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||otu...@iki.fi
  Flags||needinfo?(fed...@svgames.pl
   ||)



--- Comment #2 from Otto Urpelainen  ---
Nothing seems to be happening with this review. Do you still intend to complete
the package?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1912120] Review Request: imhex - Hex editor for reverse engineering

2021-02-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912120

c...@musicinmybrain.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from c...@musicinmybrain.net ---
I’m glad to see you have correctly handled the bundled dependencies in the
License field. You still need to follow
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling: if
upstream does not support building against an external/system version of the
bundled dependencies, you must contact them publicly about a path to doing so,
and you must add the appropriate virtual Provides to indicate the bundling.

The latest version is 1.7.0, and it has additional bundled dependencies which
you must also handle.

Since this is a GUI application, you need a desktop file
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_desktop_files). If
upstream does not provide one, you must write one. You should (not must, but
should) also write an AppData XML file
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AppData/). It makes
sense to offer both of these upstream.

When ignoring format-security warnings, you should comment on whether you think
they are spurious, and if not, why not. Or, report them upstream and let
upstream decide, and link the bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure