[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-11-12 07:33:13 --- Comment #24 from Emmanuel Seyman --- It looks like this has been released on all branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202050682%23c24 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lemonldap-ng -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202050682%23c23 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #22 from Xavier Bachelot --- Thanks Emmanuel :-) I knew about 2.17.1, and I did build it in my LLNG COPR, but there's no packaging changes since 2.17.0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202050682%23c22 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #21 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 235520 bytes in 17 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and
systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files.
Note: Systemd service file(s) in lemonldap-ng-fastcgi-server
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Perl:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[!]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Review Service --- Created attachment 1988071 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1988071&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5929465 to 6393228 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202050682%23c18 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6393228 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2050682-lemonldap-ng/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06393228-lemonldap-ng/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202050682%23c19 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #17 from Xavier Bachelot --- Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/lemonldap-ng.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/lemonldap-ng-2.17.0-1.fc40.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202050682%23c17 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(emmanuel@seyman.f | |r) | --- Comment #16 from Emmanuel Seyman --- FTR, I've restarted the review but it's going to take a few days (this is a complex spec file). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo? ||needinfo?(emmanuel@seyman.f ||r) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5929465 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2050682-lemonldap-ng/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05929465-lemonldap-ng/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Review Service --- Created attachment 1965280 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1965280&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5728981 to 5929465 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #13 from Xavier Bachelot --- Rebase to latest release: Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/lemonldap-ng.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/lemonldap-ng-2.16.2-2.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5728981 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2050682-lemonldap-ng/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05728981-lemonldap-ng/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1954616 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1954616&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5617891 to 5728981 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #10 from Xavier Bachelot --- Rebase to latest release: Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/lemonldap-ng.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/lemonldap-ng-2.16.1-2.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 Jakub Kadlčík changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://lemonldap-ng.org --- Comment #9 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5617891 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2050682-lemonldap-ng/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05617891-lemonldap-ng/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #8 from Xavier Bachelot --- COPR build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/xavierb/lemonldap-ng/build/5617980/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #7 from Xavier Bachelot --- Hi Emmanuel, Here's an update to latest release. Lasso support has been disabled for F38+ but I guess it could be enabled back after the following PR to lasso has been merged: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lasso/pull-request/8 has been merged. Upstream draft PR for specfile changes for the Fedora review is here : https://gitlab.ow2.org/lemonldap-ng/lemonldap-ng/-/merge_requests/332 Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/lemonldap-ng.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/lemonldap-ng-2.0.16-2.fc39.src.rpm Regards, Xavier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Okay, I tried to come back to this review (after putting it off for far too long). While everything I noted previously seems to have been fixed, the src.rpm no longer builds. I tried to upgrade to 2.0.15.1 but that too fails. Xavier, can you fix the build problem? Once that's done, we can (finally) finish this review once and for all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |lemonldap-ng - LemonLDAP-NG |lemonldap-ng - Web Single |WebSSO |Sign On (SSO) and Access ||Management --- Comment #5 from Xavier Bachelot --- Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/lemonldap-ng.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/lemonldap-ng-2.0.14-3.fc37.src.rpm * Fri Apr 15 2022 Xavier Bachelot - 2.0.14-3 - Improve Summary: - Drop updates-alternatives from %%post - Split long line - Add upstream patch to avoid duplicated and hidden files in -doc - Drop useless comments - Add provides for bundled javascript libraries and adapt License tag accordingly - Add provides for bundled font and adapt License tag accordingly - Make use of %%lm_sharedir instead of plain path - Add BR: for uglify-js - Move examples to %%_docdir - Fix perms on %%lm_vardir/captcha and %%_rundir/llng-fastcgi-server - Drop redundant dirs creation and perms change * Thu Feb 24 2022 Xavier Bachelot - 2.0.14-2 - Prepare for EL9 support -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
