[Bug 2217074] Review Request: ocaml-uucd - Unicode character database decoder for OCaml

2023-07-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Jerry James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
   Fixed In Version||ocaml-uucd-15.0.0-3.fc39
Last Closed||2023-07-13 23:39:29



--- Comment #10 from Jerry James  ---
The package has been built in Rawhide.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217074%23c10
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2217074] Review Request: ocaml-uucd - Unicode character database decoder for OCaml

2023-06-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074



--- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones  ---
If we're going to use my scripts to do the real OCaml 5 build (ie. the
one in the side tag) then it'd help to have these new packages already
in dist-git.  Doing a build isn't necessary though.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217074%23c9
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2217074] Review Request: ocaml-uucd - Unicode character database decoder for OCaml

2023-06-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 
 ---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-uucd


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217074%23c8
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2217074] Review Request: ocaml-uucd - Unicode character database decoder for OCaml

2023-06-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Jerry James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com |
   |)   |



--- Comment #7 from Jerry James  ---
Oh, heck, I forgot that using '@' to refer to a person turns on the needinfo
flag.  I don't need any info!  Let's just clear that.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217074%23c7
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2217074] Review Request: ocaml-uucd - Unicode character database decoder for OCaml

2023-06-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Jerry James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com
   ||)



--- Comment #6 from Jerry James  ---
This code is a reader for the Unicode character database.  If you pass the
filename of an XML Unicode character database, such as those found in
https://www.unicode.org/Public/15.0.0/ucdxml/, to the "decode" function, it
produces an OCaml representation of that database.  It does not contain the
actual Unicode character database, so I think we are okay licensewise.

Thank you for the review @rjo...@redhat.com .  I plan to wait to build this
until we create the OCaml 5.0.0 side tag.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217074%23c6
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2217074] Review Request: ocaml-uucd - Unicode character database decoder for OCaml

2023-06-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074



--- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini  ---
Don't ask me, as the Unicode Consortium :)
But since upstream doesn't say how this code came to be ... I'd say it's safe
to assume that the project's license (ISC) applies to everything.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217074%23c5
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2217074] Review Request: ocaml-uucd - Unicode character database decoder for OCaml

2023-06-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074



--- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones  ---
This is the guts of the library:
https://github.com/dbuenzli/uucd/blob/master/src/uucd.ml

I'm not sure that this kind of data dump is copyrightable at all, at least
not in the US.  Upstream is silent on how the data was generated.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217074%23c4
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2217074] Review Request: ocaml-uucd - Unicode character database decoder for OCaml

2023-06-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Fabio Valentini  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||decatho...@gmail.com



--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini  ---
Note: Usually any source code derived from Unicode data is covered by the
Unicode License Agreement (https://spdx.org/licenses/Unicode-DFS-2016.html).
I'm not sure if the data included in this package is "affected" by this, but it
would be good to check.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217074%23c3
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2217074] Review Request: ocaml-uucd - Unicode character database decoder for OCaml

2023-06-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Richard W.M. Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones  ---
*** This package is approved for Fedora ***


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217074%23c2
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2217074] Review Request: ocaml-uucd - Unicode character database decoder for OCaml

2023-06-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074



--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
  BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
  Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[-]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[-]: Package contains no static executables.

Question not really applicable to OCaml packages.

[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "ISC License", "*No copyright* ISC
 License", "*No copyright* Public domain". 9 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/tmp/2217074-ocaml-
 uucd/licensecheck.txt

License looks correct, and I believe "ISC" is a correct SPDX name too:
https://spdx.org/licenses/ISC

[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.

Yes since -devel subpackage depends on main package.

[-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.

Using a weird build system, so probably not, but it's a tiny OCaml
package so this doesn't matter in practice.

[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.

We're not building significant docs.

[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Ocaml:
[x]: This should never happen

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.

Yes there is already a LICENSE.md file & it is packaged.

[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.

Latest is 15.0.0 at time of writing.

[x]: Package does not include li

[Bug 2217074] Review Request: ocaml-uucd - Unicode character database decoder for OCaml

2023-06-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Richard W.M. Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2217074] Review Request: ocaml-uucd - Unicode character database decoder for OCaml

2023-06-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Richard W.M. Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rjo...@redhat.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rjo...@redhat.com




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2217074] Review Request: ocaml-uucd - Unicode character database decoder for OCaml

2023-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074

Jerry James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2217075





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217075
[Bug 2217075] Review Request: ocaml-uunf - Unicode text normalization for OCaml
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue