[Bug 2219206] Review Request: tlmi-auth - Certificate based authentication utility (Lenovo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-59cd1cada6 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219206%23c14 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219206] Review Request: tlmi-auth - Certificate based authentication utility (Lenovo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-59cd1cada6 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-59cd1cada6 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-59cd1cada6 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219206%23c13 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219206] Review Request: tlmi-auth - Certificate based authentication utility (Lenovo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 --- Comment #12 from Mark Pearson --- So...I think I'm 'done' :) Or at least the package is created and available in testing for Fedora38 and forwards. If I've understood it correctly - it will move from testing to stable in 7 days (presumably as long as no issues) I've tested it and it worked for me. If there's anything else I'm supposed to do let me know. Many thanks for the help along the way mark -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219206%23c12 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219206] Review Request: tlmi-auth - Certificate based authentication utility (Lenovo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-59cd1cada6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-59cd1cada6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219206%23c11 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219206] Review Request: tlmi-auth - Certificate based authentication utility (Lenovo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2023-07-11 02:12:59 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-78226a5970 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219206%23c10 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219206] Review Request: tlmi-auth - Certificate based authentication utility (Lenovo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-78226a5970 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-78226a5970 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219206%23c9 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219206] Review Request: tlmi-auth - Certificate based authentication utility (Lenovo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tlmi-auth -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219206%23c8 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219206] Review Request: tlmi-auth - Certificate based authentication utility (Lenovo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 --- Comment #7 from Mark Pearson --- As a note, when I try and create the repo with fedpkg I get this: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/code/toddlers/plugins/scm_request_processor.py", line 200, in process self.process_ticket(issue) File "/code/toddlers/plugins/scm_request_processor.py", line 308, in process_ticket self.create_new_repo( File "/code/toddlers/plugins/scm_request_processor.py", line 591, in create_new_repo pdc.new_global_component(repo, dist_git_url) File "/code/toddlers/utils/pdc.py", line 223, in new_global_component pdc["global-components"]._(payload) File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pdc_client/__init__.py", line 347, in __call__ return self.client(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/beanbag/namespace.py", line 135, in fn return basefn(getattr(self, ".base"), getattr(self, ".path"), File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/beanbag/url_v1.py", line 102, in call return self.make_request(path, verb, kwargs, body) File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/beanbag/url_v1.py", line 154, in make_request raise BeanBagException(r, beanbag.bbexcept.BeanBagException: Bad response code: 500 I assume this is just the tooling having a bad day so will try again later/tomorrow. I may have upset it - it took me a while to realise that RH bugzilla was using my lenovo address and I had to correct that after a few previous attempts. Mark -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219206%23c7 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219206] Review Request: tlmi-auth - Certificate based authentication utility (Lenovo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa --- I see no issues of note (and I'll sponsor you to be a packager), so... PACKAGE APPROVED. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219206%23c6 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219206] Review Request: tlmi-auth - Certificate based authentication utility (Lenovo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "GNU General Public License, Version 2", "*No copyright* GNU
General Public License, Version 2", "Unknown or generated", "*No
copyright* GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [obsolete FSF
postal address (Temple Place)]". 2 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-
rpmbuild/results/tlmi-auth/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
file
[Bug 2219206] Review Request: tlmi-auth - Certificate based authentication utility (Lenovo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 --- Comment #4 from Mark Pearson --- Thanks Neal, As discussed - created a COPR project; thanks for the pointers Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mpearson/tlmi-auth/fedora-38-x86_64/06154284-tlmi-auth/tlmi-auth.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mpearson/tlmi-auth/fedora-38-x86_64/06154284-tlmi-auth/tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm Copr Build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mpearson/tlmi-auth/build/6154284/ Let me know if you need anything else. Note - the rawhide build worked, but the fedora-review section failed. Mark -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219206%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219206] Review Request: tlmi-auth - Certificate based authentication utility (Lenovo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 --- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa --- > Spec URL: > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bPBx46As9m1P-Ht7wMo1tJXdxUlWRMaO/view?usp=sharing > SRPM URL: > https://drive.google.com/file/d/19wqjKZbKgjlYinG25gaACfQ_5RBjBQzs/view?usp=sharing I can't use fedora-review with this, can you please put these somewhere that can be accessed as raw content directly via HTTP(S)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219206%23c3 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219206] Review Request: tlmi-auth - Certificate based authentication utility (Lenovo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219206%23c2 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219206] Review Request: tlmi-auth - Certificate based authentication utility (Lenovo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Mark Pearson changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Mark Pearson --- Koji build results: [banther@z13 tlmi-auth]$ fedpkg --release f38 scratch-build --srpm results_tlmi-auth/1.0.1/1.fc38/tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm [] 100% 00:00:00 25.07 KiB 355.32 KiB/sec Building tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm for f38-candidate Created task: 102863114 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102863114 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 102863114 build (f38-candidate, tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm): free 102863114 build (f38-candidate, tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm): free -> open (buildvm-s390x-22.s390.fedoraproject.org) 102863121 rebuildSRPM (noarch): open (buildvm-s390x-26.s390.fedoraproject.org) 102863178 buildArch (tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm, x86_64): free 102863180 buildArch (tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm, ppc64le): free 102863181 buildArch (tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm, s390x): free 102863179 buildArch (tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm, aarch64): open (buildvm-a64-13.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 102863177 buildArch (tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm, i686): open (buildvm-x86-31.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 102863121 rebuildSRPM (noarch): open (buildvm-s390x-26.s390.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 3 free 3 open 1 done 0 failed 102863178 buildArch (tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm, x86_64): free -> open (buildvm-x86-07.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 102863180 buildArch (tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm, ppc64le): free -> open (buildvm-ppc64le-06.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 102863181 buildArch (tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm, s390x): free -> open (buildvm-s390x-23.s390.fedoraproject.org) 102863178 buildArch (tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm, x86_64): open (buildvm-x86-07.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 5 open 2 done 0 failed 102863181 buildArch (tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm, s390x): open (buildvm-s390x-23.s390.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 4 open 3 done 0 failed 102863179 buildArch (tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm, aarch64): open (buildvm-a64-13.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 3 open 4 done 0 failed 102863177 buildArch (tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm, i686): open (buildvm-x86-31.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 2 open 5 done 0 failed 102863180 buildArch (tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm, ppc64le): open (buildvm-ppc64le-06.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 6 done 0 failed 102863114 build (f38-candidate, tlmi-auth-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm): open (buildvm-s390x-22.s390.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 7 done 0 failed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219206 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219206%23c1 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
