[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Fixed In Version||ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts-0 ||.03-2.fc40 Last Closed||2023-08-15 16:54:40 --- Comment #9 from Jerry James --- ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts has been built in F39 and Rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221320%23c9 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221320%23c8 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320
--- Comment #7 from Jerry James ---
Thanks for the review!
(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #5)
> [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/ocaml
>
> I'm a bit confused by this message from fedora-review, as the package
> creates %{ocamldir}/camlp5-buildscripts/ ==
> /usr/lib64/ocaml/camlp5-buildscripts. ocamldir is owned by the OCaml
> package. I also checked this by looking at the final RPM and it all
> looks OK to me.
Oh, I see. The package does not depend on anything in ocaml-runtime, so it can
be installed standalone, leaving /usr/lib64/ocaml without an owner. I'll make
this package own that directory, too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221320%23c7
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Bug 2221320 depends on bug 2221319, which changed state. Bug 2221319 Summary: Review Request: not-ocamlfind - Front-end to ocamlfind that adds a few new commands https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221319 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320
--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/ocaml
I'm a bit confused by this message from fedora-review, as the package
creates %{ocamldir}/camlp5-buildscripts/ ==
/usr/lib64/ocaml/camlp5-buildscripts. ocamldir is owned by the OCaml
package. I also checked this by looking at the final RPM and it all
looks OK to me.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
Package uses autochangelog.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
Builds for bytecode or native code.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 4894 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Ocaml:
[x]: This should never happen
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
Just libc and other standard stuff.
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
Yes, version 0.03 is packaged which is the latest upstream.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
Yes, upstream tests are present and the spec file runs them.
[-]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /us
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones --- *** Package APPROVED for Fedora *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221320%23c6 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-review? Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rjo...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones --- Let's see if fedora-review is working now ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221320%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6274154 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2221320-ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06274154-ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221320%23c3 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James --- The package has been updated to version 0.03. New URLs: Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts/ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts/ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts-0.03-1.fc40.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221320%23c2 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Bug 2221320 depends on bug 718, which changed state. Bug 718 Summary: fedora-review seems completely broken in Rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Bug 2221320 depends on bug 2217496, which changed state. Bug 2217496 Summary: Unknown argument "-C" for command "repoquery". https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217496 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2217496 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217496 [Bug 2217496] Unknown argument "-C" for command "repoquery". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||718 CC||rjo...@redhat.com Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718 [Bug 718] fedora-review seems completely broken in Rawhide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||631 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631 [Bug 631] F39FailsToInstall: ocaml-camlp5, ocaml-camlp5-devel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Fedora Review Service changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/camlp5/c ||amlp5-buildscripts --- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6150702 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2221320-ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06150702-ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221320%23c1 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221320] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts - Sysadmin scripts for camlp5 projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2221319 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221319 [Bug 2221319] Review Request: not-ocamlfind - Front-end to ocamlfind that adds a few new commands -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
