[Bug 225877] Merge Review: guile

2010-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225877

Ondrej Vasik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||guile-1.8.7-6.fc14
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #5 from Ondrej Vasik  2010-04-08 06:29:21 EDT ---
Ok, worksforme, thanks ... approved. CLosing RAWHIDE.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 225877] Merge Review: guile

2010-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225877

--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Lichvar  2010-04-08 06:22:44 
EDT ---
License tag should be fixed in guile-1.8.7-6.fc14.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 225877] Merge Review: guile

2010-03-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225877

--- Comment #3 from Ondrej Vasik  2010-03-09 11:55:41 EST ---
Ok, fine, thanks for explanation ...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 225877] Merge Review: guile

2010-03-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225877

--- Comment #2 from Miroslav Lichvar  2010-03-09 11:39:35 
EST ---
Thanks for the review.

I'll fix the License tag in the next commit.

The .so files are actually modules used by guile, moving them to -devel package
would break guile.

The ghosts for slibcat and slib symlink were used to ensure that the files will
be correctly removed when guile is upgraded to another major version (the
location will change). They are created only when slib is installed, so it
should always point to an existing directory.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 225877] Merge Review: guile

2010-03-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225877

--- Comment #1 from Ondrej Vasik  2010-03-09 10:19:17 EST ---
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable

- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review

[re...@localhost devel]$ rpmlint guile.spec guile*.rpm i386/guile-*.rpm
guile.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) extensibility -> sensibility,
reprehensibility, comprehensibility
guile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GNU's -> G Nu's, Gnu's,
GNP's
guile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US extensibility ->
sensibility, reprehensibility, comprehensibility
guile-devel.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) extensibility ->
sensibility, reprehensibility, comprehensibility
guile-devel.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US extensibility ->
sensibility, reprehensibility, comprehensibility
guile-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
guile.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) extensibility -> sensibility,
reprehensibility, comprehensibility
guile.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GNU's -> G Nu's, Gnu's,
GNP's
guile.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US extensibility ->
sensibility, reprehensibility, comprehensibility
guile.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-3.so
guile.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-60-v-2.so
guile.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-3.so
guile.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/libguilereadline-v-17.so
guile.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib ../../slib
guile.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.so
guile.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm
guile.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 17 warnings.
[re...@localhost devel]$ rpmlint --version
rpmlint version 0.94 Copyright (C) 1999-2007 Frederic Lepied, Mandriva

Spelling errors are ok, .so files should go to devel, main package should
contain just the versioned libs. 
Dangling symlink - /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib points to /usr/share/slib - which
is not owned by guile and doesn't exist if slib package doesn't exist. This
symlink is ghosted and triggers do create it, so it probably could be removed.


+ MUST: package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
+ MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
+ MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
+ MUST: The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines
+ MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual
license

Info documentation is licensed under OFSFDL (see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/OldFSFDocLicense ) , install-sh
scripts (. , ./build-aux/ ./guile-readline/install-sh) have BSD like license
(probably MIT).

+ MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.

Included

+ MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
+ MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
+ MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task

$wget ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/guile/guile-1.8.7.tar.gz 
--2010-03-09 16:07:33--  ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/guile/guile-1.8.7.tar.gz
   => „guile-1.8.7.tar.gz.1“
Překládám ftp.gnu.org… 140.186.70.20
Navazuje se spojení s ftp.gnu.org|140.186.70.20|:21… spojeno.
Probíhá přihlašování jako anonymous… Přihlášeno!
==> SYST ... hotovo.  ==> PWD ... hotovo.
==> TYPE I ... hotovo.==> CWD (1) /pub/gnu/guile ... hotovo.
==> SIZE guile-1.8.7.tar.gz ... 4026804
==> PASV ... hotovo.  ==> RETR guile-1.8.7.tar.gz ... hotovo.
Délka: 4026804 (3,8M) (není směrodatné)

100%[==>] 4 026 804350K/s   za 13s 

2010-03-09 16:07:48 (296 KB/s) – „guile-1.8.7.tar.gz.1“ uložen [4026804]

[re...@localhost devel]$ md5sum guile-1.8.7.tar.gz*
991b5b3efcbbc3f7507d05bc42f80a5e  guile-1.8.7.tar.gz
991b5b3efcbbc3f7507d05bc42f80a5e  guile-1.8.7.tar.gz.1
= MATCHES
+ MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture
 - tested on i686, no problems
0 MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch
+ MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines
0 MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro
+ MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared libra