[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 11:58:51 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #22 from Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 12:44:42 EDT --- The upstream NSS team togther with the Mozilla team has been extremely busy with the NSS 3.13 update and I have opted not to press this at this time. This will takes the approval of both NSS and Mozilla developers and issuing notififications in the development lists. I added some comments to the bug with links to Fedora and Debian guidelines to support your request. Will add some more before I bring if up with them. NSS has cannot do anything unless it gets the buy in from the Mozilla team. NSS makes some strong commitments for binary compatibility that a change like this one could break. Having an additional bug against the Mozilla applications would help move this forward as it will get more attention. The Mozilla applications interact with NSS via xulrunner which is part of the Personal Security Manager component, aka PSM. Could I bother you with logging a paralell bug with PSM and relate the two bugs? Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-06-28 09:12:31 EDT --- I can. Do we have an upstream contact, or should I simply go through their bugtracking systems? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #18 from Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com 2011-06-28 11:26:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) It's best to go through the upstream bug tracking systems. You can assign the upstream nss bug to me. The Mozilla bug would probably be for the xulrunner component, Kai and Chris would know the best way to report that one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-06-28 13:13:37 EDT --- NSS bug filed, let me know if you need changes made: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667938 I CCd you, I can't reassign. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #20 from Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com 2011-06-28 13:31:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) Thanks, it's assigned to me now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-06-22 15:32:41 EDT --- Well, work on it awhile, and let me know what you think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #16 from Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com 2011-06-22 16:37:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) The rpath issue honestly sounds like something that really needs to be done upstream first... I agree, it should be handled upstream both in NSS and the pertinent Mozilla products. Not to mention that we should warn both upstream and downstream developers and fedora is not the only Linux distribution affected and it's not a linux-only issue. (In reply to comment #15) At the moment I am tied up with other major changes to nss and nss-softoken. Jon, Would care to copy this bug as upstream bugs, both for nss and mozilla? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-06-20 11:49:23 EDT --- Well, F15 just came out, so F16 is very early now, pre-alpha. Is this early enough? If so, I'd say make the changes you intend to, and I'll re-review that. If that's not and you'd rather wait until after f17 is branched, I'll review what's in rawhide now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cail...@redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com 2011-06-20 12:38:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) To explain why I am cautious let's look at the latest warnings and error report for autoqa. Stored logs available at http://test1250.test.redhat.com/results/30654-autotest/hp-xw9300.test.redhat.com/ nss-pkcs11-devel.i686: W: no-documentation nss-tools.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/signtool ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/crlutil ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/signver ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/ocspclnt ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/pp ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/derdump ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pk12util ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/atob ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/ssltap ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/strsclnt ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/btoa ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/symkeyutil ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/tstclnt ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/certutil ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/vfyserv ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/modutil ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/selfserv ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/cmsutil ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/vfychain ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ssltap nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary certutil nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cmsutil nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary modutil nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary signver nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary crlutil nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary signtool nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pk12util nss-devel.i686: W: no-documentation nss-devel.i686: E: rpath-in-buildconfig /usr/bin/nss-config lines ['130'] nss-devel.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nss-config nss-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation nss-devel.x86_64: E: rpath-in-buildconfig /usr/bin/nss-config lines ['130'] nss-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nss-config nss-sysinit.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libnsssysinit.so libnsssysinit.so nss-sysinit.x86_64: W: no-documentation nss-sysinit.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary setup-nsssysinit.sh nss.i686: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libnsspem.so libnsspem.so nss.i686: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libnssckbi.so libnssckbi.so nss.i686: W: no-documentation nss-pkcs11-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation nss.src: W: strange-permission setup-nsssysinit.sh 0755 nss.src:75: W: unversioned-explicit-provides nss-system-init nss.src:248: W: macro-in-comment %global nss.src:249: W: macro-in-comment %global nss.src: W: invalid-url Source12: nss-pem-20100412.tar.bz2 nss.src: W: invalid-url Source0: nss-3.12.6-stripped.tar.bz2 nss.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libnsspem.so libnsspem.so nss.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libnssckbi.so libnssckbi.so nss.x86_64: W: no-documentation nss-sysinit.i686: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libnsssysinit.so libnsssysinit.so nss-sysinit.i686: W: no-documentation nss-sysinit.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #14 from Christopher Aillon cail...@redhat.com 2011-06-20 15:34:44 EDT --- The rpath issue honestly sounds like something that really needs to be done upstream first... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-06-17 11:03:07 EDT --- I see this is now emaldonado's package? Can you have a look at this so we can get it put to bed? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #11 from Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com 2011-06-17 14:52:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) I see this is now emaldonado's package? Can you have a look at this so we can get it put to bed? Thanks! Hi Jon, What is the propsal in question that you would like me to comment on? The nss build system has changed substantially since you last reprted problems. Since 3.12.4 and Fedora-12 we have split nss into three packages: nss-util, nss-softokn, and nss. I'm sure that an rpmlinit run againts the latest srps will show different results. Quite a few error message still show up and I will be happy to discuss them with you. Some are in my list of things to fix but I am waiting to an opportune time to tacke them. By opprtune I mean very early in the relase cycle so that I can work with maintainers of packages that depend on nss to ensure we don't break them or anyone else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-03-31 12:41:07 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-04-29 16:13:14 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
