[Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #43 from Johnny Willemsen jwillem...@remedy.nl 2010-05-07 05:41:16 EDT --- Recently I had contact with Progress/IONA for something else, but I raised the IDL CFE license issue again. The problem is that it is not easy for Progress to sort out the details, the people involved in the past have left the company and they don't have resources to sort this out at this moment. Would it be an option to first just get MPC and ACE included? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #44 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-05-07 23:37:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) Recently I had contact with Progress/IONA for something else, but I raised the IDL CFE license issue again. The problem is that it is not easy for Progress to sort out the details, the people involved in the past have left the company and they don't have resources to sort this out at this moment. Would it be an option to first just get MPC and ACE included? It'll be great to first get MPC and ACE included in fedora and TAO included in rpmfusion-nonfree for a workaround, though spot thought some codes in ACE wrapper are probably nonfree. Could you help to contant Ken Sedgwick to reopen this review request and tell upstream to release seperate source tarballs for MPC, ACE, TAO and CIAO? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #42 from Chen Lei supercy...@163.com 2010-02-19 05:06:53 EST --- I think ace, tao, ciao should package separately and be pushed into rpmfusion-nonfree temporarily before they remove nonfree files. MPC can be pushed to the main fedora repo. The ace-tao is actually bundling of multiple projects. It combines four seperate projects: 1. MPC https://svn.dre.vanderbilt.edu/viewvc/MPC/ 2.ACE https://svn.dre.vanderbilt.edu/viewvc/Middleware/tags/ACE%2BTAO%2BCIAO-5_7_6/ACE/ https://svn.dre.vanderbilt.edu/viewvc/Middleware/trunk/ACE/ 3.TAO https://svn.dre.vanderbilt.edu/viewvc/Middleware/tags/ACE%2BTAO%2BCIAO-5_7_6/TAO/ https://svn.dre.vanderbilt.edu/viewvc/Middleware/trunk/TAO/ 4.CIAO https://svn.dre.vanderbilt.edu/viewvc/Middleware/tags/ACE%2BTAO%2BCIAO-5_7_6/CIAO/ https://svn.dre. vanderbilt.edu/viewvc/Middleware/trunk/CIAO/ MPC and ace also have a naming conflict with exist package in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
