[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 15:32:11 EST --- mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.f ||c14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-17 15:32:18 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-09 16:59:17 EST --- mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mingw32-webkitgtk'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-08 18:02:43 EST --- mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-11-17 10:58:16 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-11-16 10:54:26 EST --- This is a huge build, and the debuginfo package is hilarious; one of the debug files is over a gigabyte. Fortunately it compresses pretty well. Note that Fedora doesn't need BuildRoot:, %clean or the first line of %install. I think the main package %description probably needs mention of MinGW somewhere. The license information seems to be missing. The regular webkitgtk package puts it in the -doc subpackage, which is actually a guideline violation, but you seem to drop the -doc package altogether so it doesn't get in at all. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: c9bdd5eb544d9447dbfa117cac2c925b6d09091a6a9798c71f2d2e6d5ab542f9 webkit-1.3.6.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. ? description is OK. * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text not included in package. * version packaged is the same as the native Fedora version. * package is noarch. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * special mingw32 dependency generators are used. * final provides and requires are sane: mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-1.fc15.noarch.rpm mingw32(libwebkitgtk-1.0-0.dll) mingw32-webkitgtk = 1.3.6-1.fc15 = mingw32-filesystem = 63 mingw32-runtime mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(libatk-1.0-0.dll) mingw32(libcairo-2.dll) mingw32(libenchant.dll) mingw32(libgailutil-18.dll) mingw32(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll) mingw32(libgdk_pixbuf-2.0-0.dll) mingw32(libgdk-win32-2.0-0.dll) mingw32(libgio-2.0-0.dll) mingw32(libglib-2.0-0.dll) mingw32(libgmodule-2.0-0.dll) mingw32(libgnutls-26.dll) mingw32(libgobject-2.0-0.dll) mingw32(libgthread-2.0-0.dll) mingw32(libgtk-win32-2.0-0.dll) mingw32(libjpeg-7.dll) mingw32(libpango-1.0-0.dll) mingw32(libpangocairo-1.0-0.dll) mingw32(libpng14-14.dll) mingw32(libsoup-2.4-1.dll) mingw32(libsqlite3-0.dll) mingw32(libstdc++-6.dll) mingw32(libwebkitgtk-1.0-0.dll) mingw32(libxml2-2.dll) mingw32(libxslt-1.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32(ole32.dll) mingw32(pthreadgc2.dll) mingw32(user32.dll) mingw32-webkitgtk-static-1.3.6-1.fc15.noarch.rpm mingw32-webkitgtk-static = 1.3.6-1.fc15 = mingw32-webkitgtk = 1.3.6-1.fc15 mingw32-filesystem = 63 mingw32-runtime * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * static libraries are in a separate -static subpackage. * .dll and .def files in _mingw32_bindir * .dll.a and .la files in _mingw32_libdir * dll files are listed explicitly in %files. * libraries and executables are stripped properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42
--- Comment #17 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
2010-11-16 13:35:31 EST ---
Yeah, this package is a huge beast to get compiled. I don't know why the
(unstripped) binaries are so huge. The debug .so file in native Fedora package
also is quite huge, over 600MB
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=2250732) so I guess it's
something we have to live with.
I just updated published packages where all your review comments are taken care
of.
New Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk.spec
New SRPM URL:
http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.fc14.src.rpm
* Tue Nov 16 2010 Erik van Pienbroek epien...@fedoraproject.org - 1.3.6-2
- Improved the description
- Bundle the various license files
- Dropped the BuildRoot tag, the %%clean section and the
'rm -rf %{buildroot}' from the %%install section as they
aren't needed anymore these days
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-11-16 13:42:54 EST --- Great, thanks. I'm not going to bother building this because it takes a while even on my fast builder, but everything looks fine from looking at the spec. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2010-11-16 13:57:26 EST --- Thanks for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mingw32-webkitgtk Short Description: MinGW Windows web content engine library Owners: epienbro Branches: f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-11-16 14:03:14 EST --- I may have led you astray; Fedora doesn't need it and EL6 doesn't need it, but el5, being ancient, still needs BuildRoot, %clean and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #15 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2010-11-14 13:39:49 EST --- New Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-1.fc14.src.rpm Koji scratch build (F15): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2600627 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-11-13 15:11:27 EST --- I note that F14 is at webkitgtk 1.3.4 (and 1.3.6 is in testing), so this package violates http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW#Track_Fedora_native_package_versions Is there a specific reason to stay with 1.2.5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #14 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2010-11-13 18:33:33 EST --- While updating the package I wasn't aware that F14 was bundling a development version of webkitgtk. I just took the latest stable version which is 1.2.5. I'll try to provide a more recent version ASAP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #12 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2010-11-11 19:34:15 EST --- The Koji scratch build has completed successfully as well: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2595924 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #11 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2010-11-07 12:30:47 EST --- New Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk-1.2.5-1.fc14.src.rpm * Sun Nov 7 2010 Erik van Pienbroek epien...@fedoraproject.org - 1.2.5-1 - Update to 1.2.5 - Automatically generate debuginfo subpackage - Use %global instead of %define - Dropped the manual strip command - Dropped old patches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 03:42:55 EDT --- Ditto, leave these bugs open. They don't harm anyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #8 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-20 08:06:15 EDT --- Richard, Same as Bug 479874: This is a janitorial work on Fedora Package Review queues, -- http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ -- in order to identify and close stalled reviews. I'm just following this policy: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-08-20 08:11:55 EDT --- A review ticket without a submitter is useless and needs to be closed. We have few enough reviewers as it is without having them waste time on packages where they will receive no response from the submitter. In any case, if another submitter wants to take up this package, they should open their own review ticket. So this one must be closed in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 08:43:05 EDT --- Does adding NotReady to the Whiteboard help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com Bug 42 depends on bug 499986, which changed state. Bug 499986 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 42 depends on bug 499983, which changed state. Bug 499983 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 42 depends on bug 41, which changed state. Bug 41 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=41 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 42 depends on bug 502388, which changed state. Bug 502388 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-19 21:22:59 EDT --- PING It's been more than a year with no progress; This review should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
