[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework

2011-02-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402

Terje Røsten  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
   ||/show_bug.cgi?id=676930

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework

2010-11-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW)
 Resolution||NOTABUG
Last Closed||2010-11-06 09:02:17

--- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-11-06 09:02:17 EDT 
---
Sure looks like there hasn't been any response at all by the original
submitter, and it's been over a year.  I'll close it out.  It's too bad that
someone else also wanted to submit this package but this one was submitted
first.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework

2010-11-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402

--- Comment #16 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil  2010-11-06 
02:33:49 EDT ---
Shall we close this bug, as the original submitter does not seem interested
anymore?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework

2010-09-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402

Matt Rogers  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(ma...@kde.org)|

--- Comment #15 from Matt Rogers  2010-09-27 21:58:39 EDT ---
yes, still interested. busy with other things ATM. Will file another review
request bug when I get around to this again.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework

2010-09-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402

Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |needinfo?(ma...@kde.org)

--- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil  2010-09-25 
19:03:19 EDT ---
Matt, what is the status on this? Are you still interested?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework

2010-08-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402

--- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil  2010-08-30 
12:07:39 EDT ---
Yes. Sorry, for some reason I thought Tejas responded and gave up with the
package explicitly. I probably confused this with some other package. Thanks
for the reminder.

Matt, please open a new review request bug, make it block FE-NEEDSPONSOR, and
close this bug as a duplicate of the new bug.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework

2010-08-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402

--- Comment #12 from Martin Gieseking  2010-08-30 
11:58:20 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Any references? I know review request bugs where this was not true. Bug 
> 456353,
> Bug 444366, ... etc

Yes, see [1] for example. It was also mentioned here several times (e.g. in bug
#566405). Of course, there might be some cases where review requests were
"hijacked", but that shouldn't had happened.

[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy#Submitter_not_responding

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework

2010-08-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402

--- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil  2010-08-30 
11:34:35 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> bug reporter and the package maintainer should be the same person).

Any references? I know review request bugs where this was not true. Bug 456353,
Bug 444366, ... etc

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework

2010-08-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402

--- Comment #10 from Matt Rogers  2010-08-30 10:08:19 EDT ---
Yes, I recently became aware of both of the above. I'm working on other things
at the moment and will file a new review request soon.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework

2010-08-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402

--- Comment #9 from Martin Gieseking  2010-08-30 
10:01:09 EDT ---
Also, Matt probably has to be sponsored first, as I can't find his email
address in FAS.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework

2010-08-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402

--- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking  2010-08-30 
09:37:08 EDT ---
Since Tejas doesn't seem to be interested in this package any longer, Matt
should open a new review request and close this one as a duplicate (because the
bug reporter and the package maintainer should be the same person).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework

2010-08-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402

Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|oget.fed...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil  2010-08-30 
02:36:19 EDT ---
Here is the full review:

* rpmlint says:
   gmock.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jMock -> j Mock, jock,
mock
   gmock.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US matchers -> marchers,
matcher, matches
   gmock.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US minGW -> mingy, Mingus,
mingle
   gmock.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://googlemock.googlecode.com/files/gmock-1.4.0.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not
Found
   gmock-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gmock-config
   gmock-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gmock_doctor.py
   gmock-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
These can be ignored. You can ask upstream about manpages.
   gmock.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
   gmock.src:86: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
   gmock.src:86: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
   gmock.src:14: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 14, tab: line 1)
These need to be fixed.
   gmock.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgmock.so.0.0.0
_e...@glibc_2.2.5
Any explanation for this one?

! It looks like the Group for the main packages should be "System
Environment/Libraries"

! The lines
   %dir %{_includedir}/%{name}
   %{_includedir}/%{name}/*.h
   %{_includedir}/%{name}/internal
could be shortened to
   %{_includedir}/%{name}

! In the specfile you use "gmock" and "%{name}" interchangably, which breaks
marco consistency.

! The standard way of getting rid of rpath is via
   %configure
   sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g'
libtool
   sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool
which will also save you a BR. The use of chrpath is left as a last resort.

? On the devel packages why do we have
   Requires:   automake

* The tests fail via
   g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o
test/.libs/gmock-actions_test test/gmock-actions_test.o  -L/usr/lib64 -lgtest
lib/.libs/libgmock_main.so  -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib64
   /usr/bin/ld: test/gmock-actions_test.o: undefined reference to symbol
'testing::internal::ExpectationBase::RetireAllPreRequisites()'
   /usr/bin/ld: note:
'testing::internal::ExpectationBase::RetireAllPreRequisites()' is defined in
DSO /builddir/build/BUILD/gmock-1.4.0/lib/.libs/libgmock.so.0 so try adding it
to the linker command line
   /builddir/build/BUILD/gmock-1.4.0/lib/.libs/libgmock.so.0: could not read
symbols: Invalid operation
   collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
The undefined reference error can be fixed by adding a lib/.libs/libgmock.so to
the compilation line.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework

2010-08-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402

Matt Rogers  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ma...@kde.org

--- Comment #6 from Matt Rogers  2010-08-11 00:10:12 EDT ---
Spec URL: http://mattr.info:8080/gmock.spec
SRPM URL: http://mattr.info:8080/gmock-1.4.0-2.fc13.src.rpm

Addressed comments in previous review. Here's the output from rpmlint:

gmock.i686: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
gmock.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgmock.so.0.0.0 _e...@glibc_2.0
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

Not updating to gmock 1.5.0 yet, since it requires gtest 1.5.0 and fedora
hasn't updated to that version yet.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework

2010-07-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402

Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com

--- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil  2010-07-17 
13:10:38 EDT ---
ping 2? Did you give up? Shall we close the bug?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review