[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462
--- Comment #28 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-11-15 08:14:02
EST ---
rpmlint is now at:
gmpy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multiprecision ->
multiprocessing, multiprocessor, imprecision
gmpy.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://gmpy.googlecode.com/files/gmpy-1.13.zip HTTP Error 404: Not Found
gmpy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multiprecision ->
multiprocessing, multiprocessor, imprecision
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
- License header exists only in src/gmpy.c which states LGPLv2+, thus the
intention of the author can be considered clear.
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
cf6ef1c3beda3ae291da9bdad36d4e9e gmpy-1.13.zip
cf6ef1c3beda3ae291da9bdad36d4e9e ../SOURCES/gmpy-1.13.zip
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. NEEDSWORK
- Add the license, lgpl-2.1.txt, to %doc.
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
So, in summary, what you need to is change
%doc README doc/
to
%doc README lgpl-2.1.txt doc/*
to fix the two issues. After that, this package is good to go.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462
--- Comment #29 from Michael J Gruber 2010-11-15
08:46:08 EST ---
V3 according to review comments (thanks!):
http://mjg.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/python-gmpy.spec
http://mjg.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/python-gmpy-1.13-3.fc14.src.rpm
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2601767
diff --git a/SPECS/gmpy.spec b/SPECS/gmpy.spec
index 9864d93..8c6dcb0 100644
--- a/SPECS/gmpy.spec
+++ b/SPECS/gmpy.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: gmpy
Version: 1.13
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
Summary: A Python interface to the GNU Multiple Precision Arithmetic
Library
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -60,11 +60,15 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%{python_sitearch}/gmpy.so
%{python_sitearch}/gmpy-%{version}-py*.egg-info
-%doc README doc/
+%doc README lgpl-2.1.txt doc/*
%changelog
+* Mon Nov 15 2010 Michael J Gruber 1.13-3
+- include lgpl-2.1.txt in doc
+- include all doc in toplevel dir rather than subdir
+
* Tue Nov 11 2010 Michael J Gruber 1.13-2
- avoid automatic provides for .so
- add check section rather than bundling the tests
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: python-gmpy |Review Request: gmpy - |- Python interface to GMP |Python interface to GMP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462
--- Comment #30 from Michael J Gruber 2010-11-18
03:55:25 EST ---
I'm not sure whether I should wait for 1.13-3 to go through, but here's an
update for upstream's release from today. They say:
"gmpy 1.14 was released on November 18, 2010. A significant memory leak was
fixed. This is a highly recommended upgrade."
(For an update to an existing package, I should probably put this in the spec
changelog.)
http://mjg.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/gmpy.spec
http://mjg.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/gmpy-1.14-1.fc14.src.rpm
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2607773
diff --git a/SPECS/gmpy.spec b/SPECS/gmpy.spec
index 8c6dcb0..12036e6 100644
--- a/SPECS/gmpy.spec
+++ b/SPECS/gmpy.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: gmpy
-Version: 1.13
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Version: 1.14
+Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: A Python interface to the GNU Multiple Precision Arithmetic
Library
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Thu Nov 18 2010 Michael J Gruber 1.14-1
+- sync with upstream
+
* Mon Nov 15 2010 Michael J Gruber 1.13-3
- include lgpl-2.1.txt in doc
- include all doc in toplevel dir rather than subdir
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #31 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-11-18 04:11:36 EST --- Good. I'm just waiting for you to do another informal review; when you've done that I'll sponsor you. Please review only packages that are not assigned yet and not marked with FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #32 from Michael J Gruber 2010-11-18 08:04:52 EST --- Informal review for bug #608332 which is unassigned and has no FE-NEEDSPONSOR. [Took me a while to find one which is not a merge review...] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462
--- Comment #33 from Michael J Gruber 2010-11-18
08:25:07 EST ---
Now, I don't know what magic removed my review in comment #32. Luckily I had
saved most parts:
OK source files match upstream:
5095f72025132711c472b5a0db6417be13492b6ce09a74dfea9afe27165a6000
rootplot-1.1.tar.gz
OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
NOT OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
OK dist tag is present.
OK build root is correct.
OK license field matches the actual license.
OK license is open source-compatible.
license text not included upstream.
NOT OK latest version is being packaged.
OK BuildRequires are proper.
OK %clean is present.
OK package builds in koji.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2608031
OK package installs properly.
OK rpmlint is silent.
(3 spellcheck warnings which can be ignored.)
OK final provides and requires are sane:
rpm -qp --provides RPMS/noarch/rootplot-1.1-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
rootplot = 1.1-1.fc14
rpm -qp --requires RPMS/noarch/rootplot-1.1-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
/usr/bin/python
numpy
python(abi) = 2.7
python-matplotlib
root-python
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
N/A %check is present and all tests pass:
OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
OK owns the directories it creates.
NOT OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK no duplicates in %files.
OK file permissions are appropriate.
OK no scriptlets present.
OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK no headers.
OK no pkgconfig files.
OK no libtool .la droppings.
N/A desktop files valid and installed properly.
So the remianing issues are:
- Use macros rather than vars consistently (e.g. buildroot).
- You can use "python" directly.
- The latest upstream version is 2.2.
- Use %{python_sitelib}/root2matplotlib etc. so that you do not own all of
sitelib.
Also, running the first example
http://packages.python.org/rootplot/plot_directive/pyplots/first.py
through python gives
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "first.py", line 1, in
import rootplot.root2matplotlib as r2m
ImportError: No module named rootplot.root2matplotlib
Adjusting the import line results in a segmentation violation, which may very
well be ROOT's fault.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #34 from Michael J Gruber 2010-11-18 08:27:17 EST --- Uhm, sorry for making a fool out of myself by mixing up tabs and, thus, bugs. The review is where it is supposed be. rm -f comment #33. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #35 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-11-18 11:29:42 EST --- OK. I can now sponsor you. However, you need to change your bugzilla email to a non-fedoraproject.org address. Currently the accounts system isn't capable of handling them... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #36 from Michael J Gruber 2010-11-18 12:02:20 EST --- (In reply to comment #35) > OK. I can now sponsor you. However, you need to change your bugzilla email to > a > non-fedoraproject.org address. Currently the accounts system isn't capable of > handling them... My bugzilla account lists these permissions: You have the following permission bits set on your account: editbugs Can edit all aspects of any bug. fedora_bugs Fedora Bugs Group to edit bug severity and priority fedora_contrib Fedora Project Contributors setpriority Can Set Priority of Bugs (internal) Doesn't this mean that it's connected to my FAS account? (I'm a BugZapper sleeper, so to say). I think during my account setup some helpful soul did some magic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #37 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-11-18 12:15:10 EST --- I don't remember the exact reason why packagers can't have a fedoraproject.org email in bugzilla. There's some problem with the package and accounts system. I can't add you to the packager group without an external email address, which must then be the same as the one in bugzilla. You can change your BZ email in the Bugzilla settings. Email addresses are not revealed in BZ to people who are not logged in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #38 from Michael J Gruber 2010-11-19 03:05:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #37) > I don't remember the exact reason why packagers can't have a fedoraproject.org > email in bugzilla. There's some problem with the package and accounts system. > > I can't add you to the packager group without an external email address, which > must then be the same as the one in bugzilla. You can change your BZ email in > the Bugzilla settings. Email addresses are not revealed in BZ to people who > are > not logged in. While I think that my bugzilla account *is* linked up with my FAS account (because of the associated permissions) I changed my bugzilla e-mail address to the one my FAS account forwards to. After logging in with the new address, permissions are the same, so at least there's no harm done :) -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #39 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-11-19 04:44:55 EST --- This package has been APPROVED I've added and sponsored you to the packager group. You can now proceed by requesting GIT branches for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #40 from Michael J Gruber 2010-11-19 05:19:26 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gmpy Short Description: A Python interface to the GNU Multiple Precision Arithmetic Library Owners: mjg Branches: f13 f14 el6 InitialCC: -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 Michael J Gruber changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #41 from Michael J Gruber 2010-11-19 05:20:09 EST --- -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #42 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-22 08:49:22 EST --- I cannot create this package, due to the following failure: Email address m...@fedoraproject.org is not a valid bugzilla email address. Either make a bugzilla account with that email address or change your email address in the Fedora Account System https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ to a valid bugzilla email address and try again. I'm not really sure what the problem is, honestly. I asked on the admin channel but it's a bit early. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #43 from Michael J Gruber 2010-11-22 09:10:07 EST --- (In reply to comment #42) > I cannot create this package, due to the following failure: > > Email address m...@fedoraproject.org is not a valid bugzilla email address. > Either make a bugzilla account with that email address or change your email > address in the Fedora Account System https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ > to a valid bugzilla email address and try again. > > I'm not really sure what the problem is, honestly. I asked on the admin > channel but it's a bit early. This is crazy. That (m...@fp.org) used to be my bugzilla email address, and it was linked up perfectly with my FAS account because my bz account had the permissions which the bugzappers membership imply. Nevertheless I was told I need to change my bugzilla e-mail address to the one my fedoraproject.org account forwards to, or else I couldn't be sponsored. So I did the change. Should I try changing back my bz e-mail to m...@fp (which I would prefer anyways)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #44 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-11-22 09:38:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #43) > That (m...@fp.org) used to be my bugzilla email address, and it was linked up > perfectly with my FAS account because my bz account had the permissions which > the bugzappers membership imply. > > Nevertheless I was told I need to change my bugzilla e-mail address to the one > my fedoraproject.org account forwards to, or else I couldn't be sponsored. > > So I did the change. > > Should I try changing back my bz e-mail to m...@fp (which I would prefer > anyways)? This is exactly the problem that I ran into before, when I tried to use my fp address in Bugzilla. I think the email in FAS and in BZ should be the same. However, I don't see why there should be any problems now - Michael's emails in FAS and BZ would seem to be the same gmail account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #45 from Michael J Gruber 2010-11-22 09:45:48 EST --- (In reply to comment #44) > (In reply to comment #43) > > That (m...@fp.org) used to be my bugzilla email address, and it was linked > > up > > perfectly with my FAS account because my bz account had the permissions > > which > > the bugzappers membership imply. > > > > Nevertheless I was told I need to change my bugzilla e-mail address to the > > one > > my fedoraproject.org account forwards to, or else I couldn't be sponsored. > > > > So I did the change. > > > > Should I try changing back my bz e-mail to m...@fp (which I would prefer > > anyways)? > > This is exactly the problem that I ran into before, when I tried to use my fp > address in Bugzilla. I think the email in FAS and in BZ should be the same. > > However, I don't see why there should be any problems now - Michael's emails > in > FAS and BZ would seem to be the same gmail account. Quite some time ago, I had some helpful soul fix this for me so that my bz account acquired the correct permissions (I thought I'd mentioned). So our situation might only have seemed to be the same. I reverted the email-change (back to my fp address), we'll see whether another attempt by Jason succeeds now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #46 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-22 10:26:09 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-22 12:06:09 EST --- gmpy-1.14-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gmpy-1.14-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-22 12:07:28 EST --- gmpy-1.14-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gmpy-1.14-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 16:52:02 EST --- gmpy-1.14-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gmpy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gmpy-1.14-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-01 16:57:36 EST --- gmpy-1.14-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-01 16:54:33 EST --- gmpy-1.14-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|gmpy-1.14-1.fc14|gmpy-1.14-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||gmpy-1.14-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed|2010-11-06 09:13:51 |2010-12-01 16:54:41 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
