[Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

2010-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376

--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-05-21 03:16:07 
EDT ---
Is lava.vhd needed at runtime or is it more a demo/devel file?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

2010-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376

--- Comment #11 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2010-05-21 03:38:18 
EDT ---
From upstream:

When you use writeVhdl to convert a circuit to VHDL, the generated file will
use definitions from lava.vhd. So your VHDL project must import both lava.vhd
as well as the generated file.

So, it is useful for demo/development.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

2010-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376

--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-05-21 03:57:52 
EDT ---
Thanks - do you have a small example file?

Just wondering if it will look for lava.vhd in a particular place.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

2010-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376

--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-04-27 22:03:07 EDT 
---
Shakthi, would you be able to show us the whole stack of packages
that you are planning to submit to get a clearer picture?

I just want to avoid getting into supporting singleton libraries
in Fedora Haskell, since every library we add adds to the
maintenance burden of ghc rebases, etc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

2010-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376

--- Comment #9 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2010-04-27 23:04:19 
EDT ---
@Jens:

At this juncture, I have the following (and their dependencies) to be packaged,
if not available):

1. chalmers-lava2000:

  http://hackage.haskell.org/package/chalmers-lava2000

I have removed specific modules in the above that invoke/require third party
closed source software in the patch used in the .spec file.

2. ForSyDe:

  http://hackage.haskell.org/package/ForSyDe

This has dependencies that need to be packaged (parameterized-data,
type-level). packedString is deprecated and a patch is required to avoid its
use.

3. Wired:

  http://hackage.haskell.org/package/Wired

This requires chalmers-lava2000 and QuickCheck as dependencies. Modules that
use third party non-free software need to be removed with a patch.

4. Feldspar

  http://feldspar.sourceforge.net/

5. Kansas Lava:

  http://www.ittc.ku.edu/csdl/fpg/KansasLava

This is to be released in Summer 2010.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

2010-04-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on|580445  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

2010-04-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter...@redhat.com
  Status Whiteboard|notready|
   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

2010-04-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376

--- Comment #7 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2010-04-13 02:32:43 
EDT ---
- Removed INSTALL file.
- Gzip tutorial.ps and move it to docdir.
- Move Vhdl folder to docdir.
- Removed chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1 folder contents.

SPEC URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ghc-chalmers-lava2000.spec
SRPM URL:
http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ghc-chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1-3.fc12.src.rpm

Successful Koji builds for F-13 and F-14, respectively:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2112162
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2112159

$ rpmlint -iv ghc-chalmers-lava2000.spec
../SRPMS/ghc-chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1-3.fc12.src.rpm
../RPMS/i686/ghc-chalmers-lava2000-*

ghc-chalmers-lava2000.src: I: checking
ghc-chalmers-lava2000.i686: I: checking
ghc-chalmers-lava2000.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1/libHSchalmers-lava2000-1.1.1-ghc6.12.1.so
ghc-chalmers-lava2000.i686: W: executable-stack
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1/libHSchalmers-lava2000-1.1.1-ghc6.12.1.so
The binary declares the stack as executable.  Executable stack is usually an
error as it is only needed if the code contains GCC trampolines or similar
constructs which uses code on the stack.  One common source for needlessly
executable stack cases are object files built from assembler files which don't
define a proper .note.GNU-stack section.

ghc-chalmers-lava2000-devel.i686: I: checking
ghc-chalmers-lava2000-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

ghc-chalmers-lava2000-doc.i686: I: checking
ghc-chalmers-lava2000-prof.i686: I: checking
ghc-chalmers-lava2000-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency
ghc-chalmers-lava2000-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.

ghc-chalmers-lava2000-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

ghc-chalmers-lava2000-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1/libHSchalmers-lava2000-1.1.1_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.

5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

2010-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376

Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||580445

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

2010-04-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376

--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-04-07 20:06:18 EDT 
---
New haskell-platform just built for f13 which might make life easier for you
once it reaches the testing repo.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

2010-02-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard|NotReady|notready

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

2010-01-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376

--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-01-14 20:26:36 EST 
---
New cabal2spec is available in rawhide.

http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/cabal2spec/0.21.1/1.fc13/noarch/cabal2spec-0.21.1-1.fc13.noarch.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review