[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ghc-binary New Branches: el5 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-10-04 15:05:26 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2010-10-03 22:06:30 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ghc-binary New Branches: el6 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-25 07:44:31 EST --- ghc-binary-0.5.0.2-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-24 03:08:38 EST --- ghc-binary-0.5.0.2-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-binary-0.5.0.2-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2010-02-22 21:06:39 EST --- Imported and built to devel. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2007182 Thanks again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-02-19 14:07:53 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2010-02-17 04:57:29 EST --- Thanks, Konrad :) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ghc-binary Short Description: Haskell binary serialisation Owners: petersen Branches: F-13 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 Conrad Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2010-02-16 23:36:48 EST --- BAD = Please fix. N/A = Doesn't apply to this package. YES = Fine. ??? = I have some question(s). - [ YES ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. (I've excluded the incorrect spelling warnings) ghc-binary.src: W: unexpanded-macro %description -l C %ghc_lib_package ghc-binary.src: E: description-line-too-long C been observed, so this library should be suitable for high performance scenarios. ghc-binary.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install ghc-binary.src: W: no-buildroot-tag ghc-binary.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install ghc-binary.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings. - [ YES ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - [ YES ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. - [ YES ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. cabal2spec-diff looks good. - [ YES ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. - [ YES ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - [ YES ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - [ YES ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - [ YES ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). - [ YES ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. sha512sum = 9f33f23d361a6a64c93097c99c794e2324fe5069fb0eb020cb5b3b1c2ad007ed0bdae660aeb58ec58625d9ddd885110d7642f092f25d82863d7dc14fb5cf04b3 - [ YES ] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. - [ N/A ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 - [ YES ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. - [ N/A ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. - [ N/A ] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - [ N/A ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. - [ YES ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. - [ YES ] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - [ YES ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. - [ YES ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 Conrad Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kon...@tylerc.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|kon...@tylerc.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||ready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||522953 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558057] Review Request: ghc-binary - Haskell binary serialisation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558057 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-haskell-l...@redhat. ||com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2010-01-23 06:49:47 EST --- Needed to build latest ghc-hashed-storage required by darcs-2.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review