[Bug 558535] CalculiX (ccx, cgx)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558535 Bug 558535 depends on bug 566974, which changed state. Bug 566974 Summary: Review Request: cgx - finite element pre/postprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566974 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 558535] CalculiX (ccx, cgx)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558535 Bug 558535 depends on bug 566972, which changed state. Bug 566972 Summary: Review Request: ccx - finite element solver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566972 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 558535] CalculiX (ccx, cgx)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558535 Manfred Spraul changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||566974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558535] CalculiX (ccx, cgx)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558535 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-02-20 15:33:34 EST --- Would it be possible for you to follow the same template that essentially all other package review tickets follow? We have scripts that parse them, and if you'd like to increase the possibility that your packages out of the hundreds of others are reviewed, it would benefit you to follow the template. This sort of happens automatically if you use the package submission recommended by our documentation at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers Please at least use a summary like: Review Request: packagename - description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558535] CalculiX (ccx, cgx)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558535 --- Comment #4 from Manfred Spraul 2010-02-20 15:26:41 EST --- Ok. I'm creating the dependence hierarchy, sorry for any noise. At the end, this bug will remain as the placeholder for CalculiX, it can be closed immediately when all dependencies are closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558535] CalculiX (ccx, cgx)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558535 Manfred Spraul changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|566964 |566972 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558535] CalculiX (ccx, cgx)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558535 Manfred Spraul changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||566964 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558535] CalculiX (ccx, cgx)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558535 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Tracking Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@danny.cz Status Whiteboard|NotReady| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558535] CalculiX (ccx, cgx)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558535 --- Comment #3 from Dan Horák 2010-02-19 12:24:42 EST --- Hello Manfred, I will do the reviews and sponsor you. At first, please, create individual review requests for spooles, ccx and cgx (and libSNL), they are separate components and must be viewed separately. The "depends on" and "blocks" fields can be used to create their hierarchy. On first view the spooles spec file looks good, only the static subpackage should be dropped in Fedora (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries). The ccx spec looks good too. cgx - libSNL must be again packaged separately (I expect that it exists somewhere as a tar archive) and system-wide glut must be used instead of the included copy. And if you have any question, don't hesitate to ask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558535] CalculiX (ccx, cgx)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558535 --- Comment #2 from Manfred Spraul 2010-02-12 16:54:21 EST --- Dan Horak kindly showed me several obvious Packaging Violations, I've started fixing them: http://sourceforge.net/projects/calculix-rpm/ ccx-2.0-4: - spooles separated into it's own .rpm Open question: one big .so file for everything or one for "normal", one for parallel solver? The base package generates one lib with 'make global' and two libs with 'make lib'. - dynamic linking for spooles - Requires: removed from the spec file - redundant BuildRequires to gcc and sed removed Open issues: ccx: - none that I'm aware of. cgx: - the upstream source package contains (partial? modified?) copies of glut and libSNL, it's directly compiled into cgx. Probably this must be fixed. - redundant BuildRequires not yet removed. Any help is appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558535] CalculiX (ccx, cgx)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558535 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@danny.cz Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #1 from Dan Horák 2010-01-25 11:49:13 EST --- Requires work to be compliant with Fedora Packaging Guidelines - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines and also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join for details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
