[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #36 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2012-02-13 12:53:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #35) Is it possible to get this in the EL6 EPEL? Yes, though more work than I have time for ATM. If you would like to go through the process yourself, feel free to start claiming the dependencies on Fedora EPEL and start importing the rawhide packages into that. I imagine most will work just fine as is, though perhaps some may need updating due to differences in dependencies, etc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Don Hoover donhoo...@ups.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||donhoo...@ups.com --- Comment #35 from Don Hoover donhoo...@ups.com 2012-02-08 14:56:04 EST --- Is it possible to get this in the EL6 EPEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|691659 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||691659 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-07-18 15:04:52 --- Comment #34 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-07-18 15:04:52 EDT --- JRuby has been pushed into and built against rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=253399 Thank you everyone for your help. Note, the package is in but more work needs to be done on it including fixing various things and getting the test suite working again (I had it passing at one point but that was a few versions ago). I will do this incrementally but if anyone wants to help, perhaps we can coordinate via BZ or via the ruby-sig email list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-07-15 08:39:25 EDT --- Actually thinking about it, it might be possible to use the builtin gems to build jruby, and then remove them before jruby is installed, so that we are not depending on any external gems which still not shipping anything vendored. That being said, as Alexander mentioned the gems are just a build time dependency to build jruby itself, and do not get pulled in at runtime. Thus this can move forward and we can tidy up the build process as we go along. Thanks for the package review and approval Alexander! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jruby Short Description: Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter Owners: mmorsi Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@jcomserv.net Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-15 10:14:48 EDT --- Already in Fedora, will require a rel-eng trac. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #26 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-07-15 10:28:20 EDT --- rel-eng trac ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4822 Though according to this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package We still go through BZ to assign ownership of the JRuby package. Is this not correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-15 10:42:31 EDT --- Actually you may just be able to go into pkgdb and unretire now, I know there have been changes of late. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #28 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-07-15 10:51:44 EDT --- Hrm I'm not seeing the option to do so via the pkgdb web interface, could you elaborate on the process I need to take to get JRuby into Fedora. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-15 11:03:54 EDT --- When logged into pkgdb via my FAS account, and I'm at: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/jruby I see Unretire Package for the devel branch, and Take Ownership for EL-5 and EL-6. Once you have ownership, you can submit a Package Change for any additional branches you need, presumably f15 and possibly f14. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #30 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-07-15 11:36:11 EDT --- I do not see an unretire button, perhaps because you have admin rights to the pkgdb? I'm not looking to take ownership of either the EL branches, and just will be pushing JRuby into rawhide as F15 and before doesn't have the necessary dependencies. Thanks alot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a.bad...@gmail.com --- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-15 11:42:59 EDT --- If I do, it's news to me. :) I am a ProvenPackager, but I doubt that's it. Toshio, any insight? Shouldn't Mo see Unretire? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #32 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2011-07-15 15:55:27 EDT --- Nope. de facto policy from a long time ago is that cvsadmins control retiring and unretiring packages. So that's why you (John) see the unretire button but Mo does not. If you unretire the package, Mo will be able to assume ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #33 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-15 16:00:00 EDT --- Ah. Learn something new every day. Unretired, go ahead and take it, import, etc, and you should be set. Thanks Toshio! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-07-07 02:24:19 EDT --- Thanks, This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #21 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-07-07 03:24:01 EDT --- Is JRuby really ready to use system gems, such as rubygem-rake? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #22 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-07-07 03:34:42 EDT --- I have never checked this at runtime. But it surely uses them at build/install time. I think that this is enough for the review because there are a lot of use cases for jruby even without using system gems but it will surely rock if it can use them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #23 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-07-07 04:00:36 EDT --- I am afraid that installing single system gem will fetch also MRI onto the system and I don't think this is desirable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484
--- Comment #18 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-07-06
05:41:16 EDT ---
=== Issues ===
1. Install in /usr/share instead of /usr/lib
Fixed.
2. Don't install bat files.
Fixed.
3. Remove buildroot
Fixed.
4. Remove clean section
Fixed.
5. Install javadoc in unversioned directory
Fixed.
6. Install poms and depmaps
Fixed.
7. Update to 1.5.6
1.6.2 - Even better :)
8. There are a bunch of gem files like columnize, rake and etc. system rake,
rubygem-columnize and etc. should be used
Fixed.
Remaining issues:
* Please install jruby into %{_datadir}/jruby instead of %{_javadir}/jruby but
keep a symlink to jruby.jar into %{_javadir}. In short %{_javadir} is
supposed to contain only jar files.
* Please do not install jruby.exe and jrubyw.exe and jruby.dll
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484
--- Comment #19 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-07-06 20:50:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Remaining issues:
* Please install jruby into %{_datadir}/jruby instead of %{_javadir}/jruby but
keep a symlink to jruby.jar into %{_javadir}. In short %{_javadir} is
supposed to contain only jar files.
Done.
* Please do not install jruby.exe and jrubyw.exe and jruby.dll
Done
Updated sources:
SPEC URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby.spec
SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby-1.6.2-2.fc15.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Bug 561484 depends on bug 705106, which changed state. Bug 705106 Summary: Review Request: snakeyaml - YAML parser and emitter for the Java programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705106 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #17 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-06-06 17:31:12 EDT --- OK the aforementioned JRuby dependency updates have been pushed to rawhide and successfully built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #16 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-06-04 09:04:41 EDT --- Can we get all these builds pushed to rawhide so I can test the build without doing a number of local rebuilds? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||705106 --- Comment #15 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-06-02 11:20:57 EDT --- OK here is the latest JRuby SPEC/SRPM updated to the latest upstream release 1.6.2 SPEC URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby.spec SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby-1.6.2-1.fc15.src.rpm This is dependent on the snameyaml package which has already been submitted to Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705106 Additionally several of the JRuby subcomponents in Fedora need updating, including bytelist, jcodings, jaffl, jffi, jnr-posix Fortunately I own all these components and will be updating them in F15 and in rawhide momentarily. For the time being, to build JRuby, feel free to use these updated SPRMS: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/bytelist-1.0.8-1.fc15.src.rpm http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jaffl-0.5.9-1.fc15.src.rpm http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jcodings-1.0.5-1.fc15.src.rpm http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jffi-1.0.9-1.fc15.src.rpm http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jnr-posix-1.1.7-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #14 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-05-20 14:16:30 EDT --- I'll get back to this (hopefully for the last time :-p) next week -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #13 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-05-10 14:51:30 EDT --- Ping, are we moving here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #12 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-04-20 08:55:41 EDT --- FWIW, JRuby 1.6.1 is out -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Bug 561484 depends on bug 691979, which changed state. Bug 691979 Summary: Update Request: Update felix-osgi-core to version to =1.5.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691979 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||691659 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||691979 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #11 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-03-18 10:40:10 EDT --- Incidently JRuby 1.6.0 was released a few days ago. Would you be able to update to it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #10 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-03-15 12:59:31 EDT --- OK upstream got back to me and I think I integrated their fix in in a way that is acceptable for Fedora. Yecht is still a separate project / rpm, but the jruby / yecht bindings used in jruby internally have been separated into their own package. No pre-built jars are shipped, everything is built from source and shipped separately. Updated SPEC and SRPM: SPEC URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby.spec SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby-1.5.6-2.fc13.src.rpm I started adding the bits to get the test suite working. I was able to get it working locally end to end a little while back, but this required alot of modifications which will take more time to integrate into the rpm (alot of tests around pre-built jars which we remove for example). Until then I commented out the 'ant test' in the spec, though I did a surface functionality verification of the jruby/jirb utilities, so this shouldn't be a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #9 from Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-01-26 11:45:48 EST --- Sorry for the delay folks. I have updated the JRuby package (it is now running the test suite, required quite a few fixes) and it is just about ready to go save on somewhat major blocker. I added a comment an upstream bug (related, with a fix slated for the JRuby 1.6 release) describing the issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-5352 Essentially right now in the yecht dependency, we only build the yecht library, not the JRuby extension for it. To build the extension we need a build time dependency on JRuby, but JRuby itself needs a runtime dependency on yecht to work properly. Will see if I can get some upstream developers to comment on this issue and possibly a fix via the bug, email, or irc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mgold...@redhat.com Bug 561484 depends on bug 646637, which changed state. Bug 646637 Summary: Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646637 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 561484 depends on bug 561477, which changed state. Bug 561477 Summary: Review Request: jnr-posix - Java Posix layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561477 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #8 from Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2010-12-06 13:51:41 EST --- Thanks for the review. Updated the package SPEC URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby.spec SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby-1.5.6-1.fc13.src.rpm Issues 1-7 have been taken care of. As far as issue #8, I don't think we will be able to do this. Even though JRuby is a standard ruby interpreter there are enough differences between it and MRI (the main / official ruby interpreter) that each gem and ruby library/application needs to explicitly support one or the other or both. I don't think we can just use the stock ruby libraries shipped for MRI with JRuby. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-12-05 08:16:17 EST --- I'll do this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Bug 561484 depends on bug 561462, which changed state. Bug 561462 Summary: Review Request: jaffl - Java Abstracted Foreign Function Layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561462 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 11:38:49 EST --- jnr-posix and jnr-netdb have been reviewed, approved, and are working their way into Fedora. Those were the last two JRuby dependencies. Updated jruby to latest upstream release: SPEC URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby.spec SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby-1.5.5-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Bug 561484 depends on bug 646641, which changed state. Bug 646641 Summary: Update Request: Update bytelist to latest upstream release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646641 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #4 from Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2010-10-26 12:44:41 EDT --- The jaffl Fedora submission has been updated, and Bytelist and jffi have been updated in rawhide. To test this latest update you will need those latest packages. If we want to ship jruby in F14 or F13 as well, we will need to update those packages there. We can tackle that once this is in rawhide if need be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||646641, 646637 --- Comment #3 from Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2010-10-25 15:51:23 EDT --- Spent a few cycles updating this submission to the latest upstream release 1.5.3, and sorting the dependency situation for this updated package. SPEC URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby.spec SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby-1.5.3-1.fc13.src.rpm This new version adds a few new dependencies: - BZ 646637 : jnr-netdb - new dependency - BZ 646641 : bytelist - updated dependency Additionally I will be updating the jaffl (BZ 561462) submission and jffi package in Fedora to respond to feedback and to work with this new JRuby version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Jason Smith smit...@bnl.gov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||smit...@bnl.gov Bug 561484 depends on bug 561451, which changed state. Bug 561451 Summary: Review Request: nailgun - Framework for running Java from the cli without the JVM startup overhead https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561451 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 561484 depends on bug 561456, which changed state. Bug 561456 Summary: Review Request: jnr-x86asm - Pure-java port of asmjit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561456 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 561484 depends on bug 561466, which changed state. Bug 561466 Summary: Review Request: jnr-constants - Java Native Runtime constants https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561466 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Jason Smith smit...@bnl.gov 2010-09-15 16:27:13 EDT --- Since you are already well aware of the issues going on over in bug #470696, I was wondering what the chances are that jruby might get picked back up for Fedora 13/14? Currently this seems to be the best option for getting a scalable puppet system packaged into rpms for RedHat, especially since there don't seem to be the same upstream source vendor issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #2 from Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2010-09-15 16:46:12 EDT --- Would say the chances are good. The original submission worked 100%, but since some things changed since then, will need to be updated (most significantly the JRuby 1.5 release). Regardless this is still on my backlog, albeit a little pushed down due to other higher priority items on my main project, deltacloud. I hope be resuming working on this and the dependencies in the near future though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Bug 561484 depends on bug 561459, which changed state. Bug 561459 Summary: Review Request: jgrapht - A free Java graph library that provides mathematical graph objs and algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561459 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 ro...@nibor.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro...@nibor.org Bug 561484 depends on bug 561455, which changed state. Bug 561455 Summary: Review Request: yecht - A YAML processor based on Syck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561455 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Bug 561484 depends on bug 561452, which changed state. Bug 561452 Summary: Review Request: yydebug - Supports tracing and animation for a Java-based parser generated by jay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561452 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 561484 depends on bug 561448, which changed state. Bug 561448 Summary: Review Request: jffi - Java Foreign Function Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561448 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Bug 561484 depends on bug 560169, which changed state. Bug 560169 Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560169 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Bug 561484 depends on bug 561473, which changed state. Bug 561473 Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561473 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||561448, 561451, 561452, ||561455, 561456, 561459, ||561462, 561464, 561466, ||561473, 561477, 561482 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
