[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-22 13:21:12 EDT --- openvas-client-3.0.0-7.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|openvas-client-3.0.0-7.fc13 |openvas-client-3.0.0-7.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-22 13:19:08 EDT --- openvas-client-3.0.0-7.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-22 00:11:02 EDT --- openvas-client-3.0.0-7.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openvas-client-3.0.0-7.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #32 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2010-06-22 00:31:45 EDT --- Hello, I have rebuild for F-12 F-13 F-14. Builds for F-12 and F-13 were sumbittend for signing for the updates. Build for EL-5 and EL-6 failed, because openvas-libraries are not in those branches yet. Please help with testing if you have some spare time. Best regards Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-22 00:10:53 EDT --- openvas-client-3.0.0-7.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openvas-client-3.0.0-7.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #29 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-06-18 12:36:24 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #28 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2010-06-16 04:23:46 EDT --- Hello guys, seems Stjepan is busy (1 week no response), the package is reviewed and main concern (non-stripped binaries) is not reproducible. As we agreed earlier on the principles of co-maintenance I am submitting the CVS request on Stjepan's behalf. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: openvas-client Short Description: Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner Owners: sgros huzaifas xavierb rebus Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-5 EL-6 devel InitialCC: Thank you Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #24 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2010-06-07 02:14:50 EDT --- Ok, here are the new SPEC and SRPM files: Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas3/openvas-client.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas3/openvas-client-3.0.0-7.fc13.src.rpm rpmling on F13 gives me the following output: $ rpmlint openvas-client-3.0.0-7.fc13.x86_64.rpm openvas-client.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/OpenVAS-Client openvas-client.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/omp-cli openvas-client.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/OpenVAS-Client.1.gz 243: warning: `UR' not defined openvas-client.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/openvasclient-mkcert.1.gz 31: warning: `UR' not defined openvas-client.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/openvasclient-mkcert.1.gz 33: warning: `UE' not defined openvas-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary omp-cli 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #26 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2010-06-07 20:08:08 EDT --- Hello I can confirm Xavier's findings. My OpenVAS-client is definitely stripped (strip comes from binutils-2.20.51.0.2-15.fc13.i686 package). I have checked yesterday for 3.0.0-6, now I have compiled the 3.0.0-7 to confirm $rpmlint openvas-client-3.0.0-7.fc13.i686.rpm openvas-client-debuginfo-3.0.0-7.fc13.i686.rpm openvas-client.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/OpenVAS-Client.1.gz 243: warning: `UR' not defined openvas-client.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/openvasclient-mkcert.1.gz 31: warning: `UR' not defined openvas-client.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/openvasclient-mkcert.1.gz 33: warning: `UE' not defined openvas-client.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary omp-cli 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. $ file /usr/bin/OpenVAS-Client /usr/bin/OpenVAS-Client: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.18, stripped It is really stripped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #27 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2010-06-07 20:24:34 EDT --- Koji build of 3.0.0-7 is successfull: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2236964 Files from koji build for x84_64 are stripped as well $ file OpenVAS-Client omp-cli OpenVAS-Client: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.18, stripped omp-cli:ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.18, stripped Best regards Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #22 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2010-06-03 13:52:51 EDT --- I fixed Source0 and License tags. But rpmlint shows the following warnings: $ rpmlint openvas-client-3.0.0-7.fc13.x86_64.rpm openvas-client.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/OpenVAS-Client openvas-client.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/omp-cli openvas-client.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/OpenVAS-Client.1.gz 243: warning: `UR' not defined openvas-client.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/openvasclient-mkcert.1.gz 31: warning: `UR' not defined openvas-client.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/openvasclient-mkcert.1.gz 33: warning: `UE' not defined openvas-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary omp-cli 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. I think that warnings about manual pages could be ignored, but what about unstripped binary? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #23 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2010-06-03 17:23:09 EDT --- I don't get these rpmlint warnings, neither with a local mock build nor with a koji scratch build (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2228313). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #20 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2010-05-28 12:07:49 EDT --- Hello Sergio (In reply to comment #19) I was testing the application. The users manual under help doesnt work, The popup menu says: PDF file //usr/share/doc/openvas-manual/users-manual.pdf not found. openvas-manual is replaced by openvas-compendium - it is not part of the client. I believe this is not important at this stage - we do not have any openvas-compendium package sofar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #18 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com 2010-05-27 10:11:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Hello guys, If I can add opinion to the discussion - I would preffer the sysconfdir owned by 1 package and as the libraries is the common baseline, it seems logical it will be this package ovning the directory. Best regards Michal Ambroz What about creating a openvas-common subpackage that owns the common directories? There are quite a few -common subpackages with this purpose -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #19 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com 2010-05-27 10:14:16 EDT --- I was testing the application. The users manual under help doesnt work, The popup menu says: PDF file //usr/share/doc/openvas-manual/users-manual.pdf not found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #17 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2010-05-05 19:08:07 EDT --- Hello colleagues, as Stjepan is probably busy I will post an update - please can someone review? All build requirements were added to the SPEC file. Makefiles were patched to reference cflags file necessary to build of some objects. SPEC URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/12/SPECS/openvas-client.spec SRPM URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/12/SRPMS/openvas-client-3.0.0-6.fc12.src.rpm Rpmlint is free of errors: $ rpmlint openvas-client-3.0.0-6.fc12.src.rpm openvas-client-3.0.0-6.fc12.i686.rpm openvas-client-debuginfo-3.0.0-6.fc12.i686.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Koji build is successfull for FC12 and FC13: Koji build for FC13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2166099 Koji build for FC12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2166123 Best regards Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #16 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2010-04-26 23:05:34 EDT --- Building in koji fails. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2139416 Missing dependencies: BuildRequires: zlib-devel BuildRequires: gtk2-devel BuildRequires: gpgme-devel BuildRequires: glib-devel BuildRequires: gnutls-devel Pakage is still failing to build in koji FC13. file cflags in src directory is created too late so building of package is still failing: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2139686 Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #15 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2010-04-25 08:25:59 EDT --- I have added request to openvas-client bugzila to consider adding of the symlinks as it is done in fedora (and debian) package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #13 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2010-04-18 05:40:03 EDT --- Ok, the new package will be available tomorrow on the following links (currently, the server is down because some work is done on the power supply in the building): Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas3/openvas-client.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas3/openvas-client-3.0.0-4.fc12.src.rpm I renamed desktop file, changed group, added htmldoc require. For symlinks, I looked in debian package and they also add symlinks. So, I created them. But I don't think there is a point in asking upstream to change the name of the binary. There is no point in changing it because some packager asks for it, there are plenty of other users that are probably used to it as it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #14 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2010-04-18 05:46:59 EDT --- Ops, wrong URLS: Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas3/openvas-client.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas3/openvas-client-3.0.0-5.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #11 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2010-04-16 18:43:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) 1) inconsistency in naming between the openvas packages Most tools in openvas suite are named openvas-something except the client OpenVAS-Client . The discrepancy is comming from the upstream package. I would recommend to create symbolic link openvas-client just for comfort - big letters are sexy, but could be hard to remember when all the other tools from the suite are lowercase. Agreed, a lower-case symlink would be handy. 2) OpenVAS-Client is crushing with export to LaTeX of empty report reported upstream http://wald.intevation.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1343group_id=29atid=220 This fixes it and could be included as a patch : http://wald.intevation.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/trunk/openvas-client/openvas/latex_output.c?root=openvasrev=7137r1=5830r2=7137makepatch=1diff_format=h 3) Export to pdf requires htmldoc As report to pdf won't be probably the main exports used, however there is question whether there should be rpm dependency added to the spec file. If it doesn't drag too much dependencies, it probably should. What happens if you try to use this feature and htmldoc is not available ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #12 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2010-04-16 19:14:02 EDT --- The files are currently unavailable, but here a couple notes based on an older version : - rename Source1: OpenVAS.desktop to openvas-client.desktop to match the package name. - License is GPLV2 and GPLv2+, there are files under both GPLv2 and GPLv2 or later license, the resulting binary is likely GPLv2. I need to double check the licensing guidelines to make sure. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing - Group: System Environment/Libraries is wrong, I'd use something like Applications/System. - Following Michal comment above about the non-lowercase OpenVAS-Client binary name, the manpage should also have a symlink to the lowercase equivalent. Actually, I think it would be even better to ask upstream to switch to lowercase. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #10 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2010-03-25 15:35:07 EDT --- Hello, I was testing the openvas-client so here are my 2 copper coins: 1) inconsistency in naming between the openvas packages Most tools in openvas suite are named openvas-something except the client OpenVAS-Client . The discrepancy is comming from the upstream package. I would recommend to create symbolic link openvas-client just for comfort - big letters are sexy, but could be hard to remember when all the other tools from the suite are lowercase. 2) OpenVAS-Client is crushing with export to LaTeX of empty report reported upstream http://wald.intevation.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1343group_id=29atid=220 3) Export to pdf requires htmldoc As report to pdf won't be probably the main exports used, however there is question whether there should be rpm dependency added to the spec file. Best regards Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #9 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2010-03-21 06:34:14 EDT --- Hello guys, If I can add opinion to the discussion - I would preffer the sysconfdir owned by 1 package and as the libraries is the common baseline, it seems logical it will be this package ovning the directory. Best regards Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||openvas-client -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #8 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2010-03-04 04:23:46 EST --- My reasoning was that the user will install libraries and also either scanner or client, or both. Because it's obvious that only libraries will be installed in a very few cases (if any) I thought that this is the better solution. Also, wouldn't it be confusing if I query to which package /etc/openvas belongs and I get two answers? I newer encountered such a case, which of course, doesn't mean it don't exists. But, I can change it back, if you think it's better solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #5 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2010-03-03 04:00:06 EST --- I fixed configuration file problems. Here are new spec and srpm files: Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas3/openvas-client.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas3/openvas-client-3.0.0-4.fc12.src.rpm Directory ownership of /etc/openvas I moved to the libraries as both, scanner and client, use this directory so if both are installed there would be a collision. For a reference, here is a new SPEC file for the libraries, the change is actually a minor one: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas3/openvas-libraries.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #6 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2010-03-03 04:06:49 EST --- Created an attachment (id=397514) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=397514) Changes in openvas-libraries related to the changes in client Here is a small patch against spec file for openvas libraries in the CVS that makes libraries owner of /etc/openvas directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #7 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2010-03-03 04:18:01 EST --- Not sure moving the ownership of the sysconfdir to the libraries is the preferred solution. There is nothing wrong with the sysconfdir being owned by both the openvas-client and openvas-scanner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 Bug 562470 depends on bug 562467, which changed state. Bug 562467 Summary: Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562467 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470
Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||huzai...@redhat.com,
||xav...@bachelot.org
--- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2010-02-18 19:12:08
EST ---
Few comments :
- -b 0 in %setup is useless
- %{_sysconfdir}/openvas/openvas-client_log.conf should be marked as
%config(noreplace)
- manfiles should end with .* rather than .gz in case the compression format
ever changes.
- Missing BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop
- You must not add a vendor tag to the desktop file.
Adding Huzaifa to the CC list.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fab...@bernewireless.net Blocks||563471(FE-SECSPIN) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||562467 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #1 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2010-02-06 16:17:51 EST --- *** Bug 538299 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
