[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2020-01-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

URL|https://sourceforge.net/tra |https://sourceforge.net/tra
   |cker/?func=detail&aid=29712 |cker/?func=detail&aid=29712
   |59&group_id=168625&atid=847 |59&group_id=168625&atid=847
   |490 |490
 Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE
  Alias|wapiti  |



--- Comment #17 from Fabian Affolter  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1787225 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-12-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Blocks|563471(FE-SECLAB)   |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW)
 Resolution||NOTABUG
  Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter|
Last Closed||2010-12-17 12:51:54

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-11-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter

--- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-11-17 18:13:31 EST 
---
Was the license issue ever fixed?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||wapiti

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

Mamoru Tasaka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

URL||https://sourceforge.net/tra
   ||cker/?func=detail&aid=29712
   ||59&group_id=168625&atid=847
   ||490

--- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka  2010-03-17 
02:43:34 EDT ---
Okay, thank you for followups.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

--- Comment #14 from Nikolay Ulyanitsky  2010-03-16 
09:11:38 EDT ---
> Anyway license issue must need fixing.

Thank you for the package reviewing.
The issue was added to an upstream bugzilla.

Licensing issue: GPLv2 and ASL 2.0 are incompatible - ID: 2971259
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2971259&group_id=168625&atid=847490

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

--- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka  2010-03-14 
12:31:56 EDT ---
Anyway license issue must need fixing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

--- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka  2010-03-14 
12:22:20 EDT ---
- It seems that 389-admin license has some exception declaration
  which allows to combine GPL part and ASL part of this software
  explicitly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka  2010-03-14 
12:14:39 EDT ---
... note that if you point out some potential legal issue on
other packages, it does _NOT_ affect this review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

--- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka  2010-03-14 
12:17:44 EDT ---
Note that
- for xsd: this says "GPLv2 with exceptions" and ASL 2.0, and
  for this package actually the submitter (also the upstream), 
  I and spot had some discussion
- 389-admin: I don't know well.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

--- Comment #9 from Nikolay Ulyanitsky  2010-03-14 
12:07:01 EDT ---
> Well, while I don't know well about maven-plugin-cobertura, again
> the problem is that 
> - man page claims that wapiti is under GPLv2 (not GPLv2+ or GPL+)
> - and wapiti uses some file which is under ASL 2.0
> - and GPLv2 and ASL 2.0 is legally incompatible
> so we cannot distribute wapiti, not the issue of correcting license tag or so.

Other examples from F-12 CVS:
* 389-admin: GPLv2 and ASL 2.0
* xsd: GPLv2 with exceptions and ASL 2.0

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

--- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka  2010-03-14 
11:53:20 EDT ---
Well, actually maven-plugin-cobertura seems under ASL 2.0 and GPL+ 
and GPLv2+.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

--- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka  2010-03-14 
11:47:17 EDT ---
Well, while I don't know well about maven-plugin-cobertura, again
the problem is that 
- man page claims that wapiti is under GPLv2 (not GPLv2+ or GPL+)
- and wapiti uses some file which is under ASL 2.0
- and GPLv2 and ASL 2.0 is legally incompatible
so we cannot distribute wapiti, not the issue of correcting license tag or so.

Note that GPLv3 and ASL 2.0 is compatible, so GPL+ (i.e. GPL with any version)
and ASL 2.0, or GPLv2+ and ASL 2.0 is okay, however GPLv2 and ASL 2.0 are
incompatible.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

--- Comment #6 from Nikolay Ulyanitsky  2010-03-13 
16:02:26 EST ---
> For now license issue only

We can change the license to GPLv2 and MIT and ASL 2.0.

Examples:
* maven-plugin-cobertura: ASL 2.0 and GPLv2 and GPLv2+
* jrefactory: BSD and ASL 1.1 and GPL+
* zikula-module-menutree: GPL+ and ASL 2.0


Spec.diff:
@@ -4,11 +4,11 @@

 Name:   wapiti
 Version:2.2.1
-Release:2%{?dist}
-Summary:A web application vulnerability scanner
+Release:3%{?dist}
+Summary:Web application vulnerability scanner

 Group:  Applications/Internet
-License:GPLv2
+License:GPLv2 and MIT and ASL 2.0
 URL:http://wapiti.sourceforge.net/
 Source0:   
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/wapiti/wapiti/wapiti-%{version}/wapiti-%{version}.tar.bz2
 #
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2954112&group_id=168625&atid=847490
@@ -58,17 +58,17 @@
 %patch1 -p1

 # Copy setup.py
-%{__cp} %{SOURCE1} setup.py
+cp %{SOURCE1} setup.py

-# Change files encoding to utf8
+# Change an encoding of files to UTF-8
 for f in ChangeLog_lswww; do
 iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 $f > $f.tmp
 touch -r $f $f.tmp
-%{__mv} $f.tmp $f
+mv $f.tmp $f
 done

 # Use system libraries BeautifulSoup, httplib2, SocksiPy
-%{__rm} -rf src/net/BeautifulSoup.py src/net/httplib2/
+rm -rf src/net/BeautifulSoup.py src/net/httplib2/


 %build
@@ -76,42 +76,47 @@


 %install
-%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}
+rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot}

 # Remove the interpreter from site-packages
 find %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib} -type f -iname "*py" -exec \
-%{__sed} -i 's/#!\/usr\/bin\/env python//' {} \;
+sed -i 's/#!\/usr\/bin\/env python//' {} \;

 %find_lang %{name}


 %clean
-%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}
+rm -rf %{buildroot}


 %files -f %{name}.lang
 %defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog_Wapiti ChangeLog_lswww README TODO example.txt
-%dir %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}
-%dir %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/attacks
-%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/attacks/*
-%{_bindir}/%{name}
-%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}*
-%dir %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/
-%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/attack/
-%dir %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/config/
-%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/config/vulnerabilities/
-%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/file/
-%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/language/
-%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/net/
-%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/report/
-%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/report_template/
-%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/vulnerability.py*
-%{python_sitelib}/%{name}-*.egg-info
+%dir %{_sysconfdir}/wapiti
+%dir %{_sysconfdir}/wapiti/attacks
+%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/wapiti/attacks/*
+%{_bindir}/wapiti
+%{_mandir}/man1/wapiti*
+%dir %{python_sitelib}/wapiti/
+%{python_sitelib}/wapiti/attack/
+%dir %{python_sitelib}/wapiti/config/
+%{python_sitelib}/wapiti/config/vulnerabilities/
+%{python_sitelib}/wapiti/file/
+%{python_sitelib}/wapiti/language/
+%{python_sitelib}/wapiti/net/
+%{python_sitelib}/wapiti/report/
+%{python_sitelib}/wapiti/report_template/
+%{python_sitelib}/wapiti/vulnerability.py*
+%{python_sitelib}/wapiti-*.egg-info


 %changelog
+* Sat Mar 13 2010 Nikolay Ulyanitsky  - 2.2.1-3
+- Fix the license
+- Fix the summary
+- Replace generally useful macros by regular commands
+
 * Thu Mar 11 2010 Nikolay Ulyanitsky  - 2.2.1-2
 - Move gettext MO files to /usr/share/locale
 - Preserve timestamps on documentation files


Spec URL: http://repo.lystor.org.ua/fedora/12/SPECS/wapiti.spec
SRPM URL: http://repo.lystor.org.ua/fedora/12/SRPMS/wapiti-2.2.1-3.fc12.src.rpm

The srpm builds successfully by the mock on Fedora 11, 12, 13 with i386/x86_64
architectures.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

--- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka  2010-03-11 
06:05:20 EST ---
For now license issue only

- MIT is no problem because MIT is compatible with GPLv2.
  I rechecked the whole code again and it seems that
  only ./src/report_template/includes/js/excanvas.js (ASL 2.0) is
  problematic.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

--- Comment #4 from Nikolay Ulyanitsky  2010-03-11 
05:15:30 EST ---
Hi
Thank you for starting the review.

Spec URL: http://repo.lystor.org.ua/fedora/12/SPECS/wapiti.spec
SRPM URL: http://repo.lystor.org.ua/fedora/12/SRPMS/wapiti-2.2.1-2.fc12.src.rpm


> Would you move GNU message catalogs (.mo files) to the normal directory

Yes.
wapiti-2.2.1-std_lib_paths.patch and wapiti-setup.py have been changed.

Spec diff:
--- wapiti.spec.orig 2010-02-18 12:58:53.0 +0200
+++ wapiti.spec 2010-03-11 11:52:09.231822854 +0200
@@ -1,11 +1,10 @@
 %if ! (0%{?fedora} > 12 || 0%{?rhel} > 5)
 %{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib())")}
-%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib(1))")}
 %endif

 Name:   wapiti
 Version:2.2.1
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
 Summary:A web application vulnerability scanner

 Group:  Applications/Internet
@@ -16,7 +15,8 @@
 Source1:wapiti-setup.py
 # Split wapiti sources between site-packages/wapiti/* and /usr/bin/wapiti,
 # move working dirs (generated_report, scans) from site-packages/wapiti/ to
~/.wapiti/,
-# move config dir site-packages/wapiti/config/attacks to /etc/wapiti/attacks
+# move config dir site-packages/wapiti/config/attacks to /etc/wapiti/attacks,
+# move gettext MO files from site-packages/wapiti/config/language to
/usr/share/locale
 #
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2954112&group_id=168625&atid=847490
 Patch0: wapiti-2.2.1-std_lib_paths.patch
 # Use system libraries BeautifulSoup, httplib2, SocksiPy
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
 # Change files encoding to utf8
 for f in ChangeLog_lswww; do
 iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 $f > $f.tmp
+touch -r $f $f.tmp
 %{__mv} $f.tmp $f
 done

@@ -82,12 +83,14 @@
 find %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib} -type f -iname "*py" -exec \
 %{__sed} -i 's/#!\/usr\/bin\/env python//' {} \;

+%find_lang %{name}
+

 %clean
 %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}


-%files
+%files -f %{name}.lang
 %defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog_Wapiti ChangeLog_lswww README TODO example.txt
 %dir %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}
@@ -98,12 +101,6 @@
 %dir %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/
 %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/attack/
 %dir %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/config/
-%dir %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/config/language/
-%dir %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/config/language/*
-%dir %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/config/language/*/LC_MESSAGES
-%lang(en) %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/config/language/en/LC_MESSAGES/%{name}*
-%lang(es) %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/config/language/es/LC_MESSAGES/%{name}*
-%lang(fr) %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/config/language/fr/LC_MESSAGES/%{name}*
 %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/config/vulnerabilities/
 %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/file/
 %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/language/
@@ -115,6 +112,10 @@


 %changelog
+* Thu Mar 11 2010 Nikolay Ulyanitsky  - 2.2.1-2
+- Move gettext MO files to /usr/share/locale
+- Preserve timestamps on documentation files


$ rpmlint wapiti-2.2.1-2.fc12.noarch.rpm 
wapiti.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2
wapiti.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US webpages -> web pages,
web-pages, equipages
wapiti.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US webapp -> web app,
web-app, Webern
wapiti.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fuzzer -> fuzzier,
fuzzes, fuzzed
wapiti.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fopen -> open, f open,
fop en
wapiti.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US XPath -> X Path, Path,
Expat
wapiti.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eval -> veal, vela, val
wapiti.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US passtru -> passport,
passerby, passer
wapiti.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ponctual -> punctual,
nonfactual, punctuate
wapiti.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Nikto -> Nikon, Nikita,
Nikolai
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 9 warnings.

python-httplib2 is required but rpm dependency generator can not find it



> * Well, from ./doc/wapiti.1 this software seems to be licensed under
>  GPLv2 (strict). 
>
>  However ./src/report_template/includes/js/excanvas.js is licensed under
>  ASL 2.0, which is also included in rebuilt binary rpm and unfortunately
>  GPLv2 and ASL 2.0 is incompatible:
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing

Also there are many files with MIT license in ./src/report_template/includes/js 
(canvaschartpainter.src.js, chart.src.js, iecanvas.htc, e

[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

Bug 566412 depends on bug 566409, which changed state.

Bug 566409 Summary: Review Request: python-SocksiPy - A Python SOCKS module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566409

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

Mamoru Tasaka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka  2010-03-08 
14:29:32 EST ---
Before reviewing this:
* Well, from ./doc/wapiti.1 this software seems to be licensed under
  GPLv2 (strict). 

  However ./src/report_template/includes/js/excanvas.js is licensed under
  ASL 2.0, which is also included in rebuilt binary rpm and unfortunately
  GPLv2 and ASL 2.0 is incompatible:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing

  Would you ask the upstream about this?

* Would you move GNU message catalogs (.mo files) to the normal directory
  for these files (i.e. /usr/share/locale//LC_MESSAGES)? (patch may be
  needed, I have not checked this, though)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-03-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

Mamoru Tasaka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

Nikolay Ulyanitsky  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||566409

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fab...@bernewireless.net
 Blocks||563471(FE-SECSPIN)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-02-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

--- Comment #2 from Nikolay Ulyanitsky  2010-02-19 
07:53:14 EST ---
Builds successfully in mock on Fedora 13 with i386/x86_64 architectures.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-02-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

--- Comment #1 from Nikolay Ulyanitsky  2010-02-19 
04:42:05 EST ---
Builds successfully in mock on Fedora 11 with i386/x86_64 architectures.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner

2010-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412

Nikolay Ulyanitsky  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review