[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2015-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #17 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: libaesgm
New Branches: epel7
Owners: orion
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2015-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2015-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560



--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2010-05-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2010-05-24 15:35:31 EDT ---
libaesgm-20090429-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2010-05-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2010-05-24 15:42:22 EDT ---
libaesgm-20090429-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2010-05-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|libaesgm-20090429-2.fc11|libaesgm-20090429-2.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2010-05-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2010-05-24 15:47:09 EDT ---
libaesgm-20090429-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2010-05-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|libaesgm-20090429-2.fc13|libaesgm-20090429-2.fc12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2010-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #5 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-05-21 
07:50:46 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: libaesgm
Short Description: Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic
methods
Owners: spot
Branches: F-11 F-12 F-13 devel
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2010-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-21 
17:36:51 EDT ---
libaesgm-20090429-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libaesgm-20090429-2.fc12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2010-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-21 
17:37:03 EDT ---
libaesgm-20090429-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libaesgm-20090429-2.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2010-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-21 
17:37:08 EDT ---
libaesgm-20090429-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libaesgm-20090429-2.fc11

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2010-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||lemen...@gmail.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2010-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-05-13 10:26:37 EDT 
---
REVIEW:

Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable

+ rpmlint is almost silent

Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/libaesgm-*
libaesgm.ppc: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cryptographic - cryptographer,
cryptography, cryptogram
libaesgm.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -
cryptographer, cryptography, cryptogram
libaesgm-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:

These messages may be ignored.

+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (BSD).
0 The package does not include the text of the license(s) in its own file.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL:

Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum aes-src-29-04-09.zip*
0b6d09c741dcd1c100cdcdd8b5f5bf85cfe54bdd7bea1f96916c2471280ddf03 
aes-src-29-04-09.zip
0b6d09c741dcd1c100cdcdd8b5f5bf85cfe54bdd7bea1f96916c2471280ddf03 
aes-src-29-04-09.zip.1
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES:

+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2185723

0 No additional build dependencies.
0 No need to handle locales.
+ The package calls ldconfig in %post and %postun.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
+ The package isn't designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ Header files are in a -devel package.
0 No static libraries.
+ The library file that ends in .so (without suffix) is in a -devel package.
+ The devel package requires the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
+ The packages does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ All filenames in the packages are valid UTF-8.

I've got only one simple note - if you plan to provide package also for EPEl,
then you will need to add rm -rf %{buildroot} in the %install section.

This package is

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2010-02-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

--- Comment #3 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-02-22 
16:27:43 EST ---
Thanks for these good points. I really should know better. Those issues are
fixed in 20090429-2:

New SRPM:
http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/libaesgm-20090429-2.fc14.src.rpm
New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/libaesgm.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2010-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

--- Comment #1 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-02-18 
15:06:34 EST ---
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1997477

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods

2010-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560

--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2010-02-18 18:57:57 
EST ---
 Version:  290409

Their scheme appears to be %d-%m-%y, which looks fragile. What would happen if
they released the next update on 7th of October?  071009  290409


 -shared -Wl,-soname,libaesgm.so.0.0

Is the double-zero intentional?

$ rpmls -p libaesgm-290409-1.fc12.i686.rpm |grep /usr/lib
lrwxrwxrwx  /usr/lib/libaesgm.so.0
lrwxrwxrwx  /usr/lib/libaesgm.so.0.0
-rwxr-xr-x  /usr/lib/libaesgm.so.0.0.0


* There is no default %clean section yet to rm -rf %buildroot.


* A proper namespace for the header files would be better than generic names
such as /usr/include/aes.h, e.g. installing into %_includedir/aesgm or
%_includedir/libaesgm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review