[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #30 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Peng Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #29 from Peng Wu --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ibus-handwrite New Branches: epel7 Owners: pwu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 04:44:01 EDT --- ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc13 |ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-27 02:00:16 EDT --- ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-19 22:13:40 EDT --- ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-07 18:18:44 EDT --- ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-06 02:08:12 EDT --- ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-06-03 16:11:24 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731
--- Comment #21 from Peng Wu 2010-06-02 02:47:32 EDT ---
Thanks for reviewing.
(In reply to comment #20)
> Some issue unrelated to package review need attention:
> 1.patch0 should send to upstram
Will do it later.
> 2.The debuginfo package for zinnia is incorrect, you should use make
> CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags} instead of
> make %{?_smp_mflags}.
Will check this when importing.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #22 from Peng Wu 2010-06-02 03:09:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ibus-handwrite Short Description: hand write recognition/input using ibus IM engine Owners: pwu Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC: petersen phuang i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731
--- Comment #20 from Chen Lei 2010-06-01 06:35:15 EDT
---
Some issue unrelated to package review need attention:
1.patch0 should send to upstram
2.The debuginfo package for zinnia is incorrect, you should use make
CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags} instead of
make %{?_smp_mflags}.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731
Chen Lei changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|supercyp...@gmail.com
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #19 from Chen Lei 2010-06-01 06:22:36 EDT
---
+:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing
MUST Items:
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package.
ibus-handwrite.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
ibus-handwrite.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
ibus-handwrite.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://ibus-handwrite.googlecode.com/files/ibus-handwrite-2.1.0.tar.bz2 HTTP
Error 404: Not Found
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [FIXME?: covers this
list and more]
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
8802882e535f825713088db12569f103
[+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
The package is approved.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #18 from Peng Wu 2010-06-01 01:52:52 EDT --- The updated srpm and spec is here: Spec URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ibus-handwrite/ibus-handwrite.spec SRPM URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ibus-handwrite/ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc13.src.rpm Please review it, thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731
--- Comment #17 from Peng Wu 2010-06-01 01:50:33 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Some initial comment
> 1.
> %{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from
> distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")}
> %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from
> distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")}
>
> %define mod_path ibus-1.2
> %define zinnia_tomoe_version 0.6.0-20080911
>
> It seems those macros are not used in spec?
removed.
>
> 2.Patch0: ibus-handwrite-2.0.1-fixes-ibus-component-xml.patch
> Is this patch specific to fedora?
>
Not specific.
> 3.
> BuildRequires: zinnia-devel zinnia-tomoe
> ->BuildRequires: zinnia-devel
> Requires: ibus gtk2
> -> ibus
>
merged.
> 4.
> %build
> ./autogen.sh
> You don't modify configure.ac or Makefile.am, this may be not needed.
>
commented out.
> 5.
> %files
> %dir %{_datadir}/ibus-handwrite
> %{_datadir}/ibus-handwrite/icons/ibus-handwrite.svg
> %{_datadir}/ibus-handwrite/data/table.txt
> ->
> %files
> %{_datadir}/ibus-handwrite
>
> You must own all directories in %{_datadir}/ibus-handwrite.
>
merged.
> 6.
>
> BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
>
> %install
> rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
>
> Those two line are only needed for EPEL5.
removed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731
--- Comment #16 from Chen Lei 2010-05-27 02:30:53 EDT
---
Some initial comment
1.
%{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")}
%{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")}
%define mod_path ibus-1.2
%define zinnia_tomoe_version 0.6.0-20080911
It seems those macros are not used in spec?
2.Patch0: ibus-handwrite-2.0.1-fixes-ibus-component-xml.patch
Is this patch specific to fedora?
3.
BuildRequires: zinnia-devel zinnia-tomoe
->BuildRequires: zinnia-devel
Requires: ibus gtk2
-> ibus
4.
%build
./autogen.sh
You don't modify configure.ac or Makefile.am, this may be not needed.
5.
%files
%dir %{_datadir}/ibus-handwrite
%{_datadir}/ibus-handwrite/icons/ibus-handwrite.svg
%{_datadir}/ibus-handwrite/data/table.txt
->
%files
%{_datadir}/ibus-handwrite
You must own all directories in %{_datadir}/ibus-handwrite.
6.
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Those two line are only needed for EPEL5.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #15 from Peng Wu 2010-05-27 02:18:13 EDT --- The updated srpm and spec is here: Spec URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ibus-handwrite/ibus-handwrite.spec SRPM URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ibus-handwrite/ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Please review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #14 from Peng Wu 2010-05-27 02:16:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Why: > export LDFLAGS=" -lm " > ? I think this is because gcc now requires to explicit link all related library, it now can't be implicit link as the past. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2010-05-27 02:08:19 EDT --- Why: export LDFLAGS=" -lm " ? (In reply to comment #12) > Although the spec file seems to be coded for a specific user > and drops to root when it can find it. I don't know if this is normal, but > other srpm I built weren't like this. Could you explain - I didn't understand this comment. Peng Wu, please post direct urls to the spec and srpm. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|575005 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|507684(F13Target) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #12 from DemetrisK 2010-04-27 12:08:20 EDT --- Works just fine. Although the spec file seems to be coded for a specific user and drops to root when it can find it. I don't know if this is normal, but other srpm I built weren't like this. I guess all the related feedback about ibus-handwrite should be posted at http://code.google.com/p/ibus-handwrite/ ... I have a few recommendations... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #11 from Peng Wu 2010-04-26 23:39:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I see, thanks. I'm going to give it a try soon. I guess the same spec file > will > do? welcome. I post a new version of ibus-handwrite spec and srpm on: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ibus-handwrite/ and the zinnia-tomoe package can be found here: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/zinnia-tomoe/ Feel free to try it. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #10 from Peng Wu 2010-04-26 03:29:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I see, thanks. I'm going to give it a try soon. I guess the same spec file > will > do? The ibus-handwrite spec needs to add some modifications to it, I will post a new spec soon. And it will depends on a new srpm zinnia-tomoe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #9 from DemetrisK 2010-04-23 07:02:35 EDT --- I see, thanks. I'm going to give it a try soon. I guess the same spec file will do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #8 from Peng Wu 2010-04-23 03:34:49 EDT --- Hi DemetrisK, We talked with the author microcai, and he added the Japanese zinnia model file support for ibus-handwrite. From here:http://code.google.com/p/ibus-handwrite/downloads/list The handwriting-ja.model (Japanese zinnia tomoe model file) support is added in next version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #7 from Peng Wu 2010-04-19 22:11:34 EDT --- Hi DemetrisK, In ibus-handwrite code, this package hard coded zh_CN.model. Currently it doesn't support Japanese Handwriting input methods. Maybe you can try Open-Source Chinese and Japanese Handwriting Recognition(http://tegaki.org/). dunno, whether it exists in Fedora yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 DemetrisK changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dekac...@hotmail.com --- Comment #6 from DemetrisK 2010-04-19 07:17:42 EDT --- Hi. I have a few questions, I built and installed the provided srpm and a new im engine was installed for ibus that allows me to input only CN Kanji characters. Is this what is supposed to happen? Or there is Japanese support too, like there was in scim-tomoe? In the /BUILD I can see a zinnia-tomoe folder (this is probably what I wanted to install at the first place) but not any trace of it being installed along with ibus-handwrite. Oh, and I wanted to ask when can we except any of the available Japanese Handwriting input methods to be included in the stable repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #5 from Chen Lei 2010-04-04 03:44:15 EDT --- Hi Peng Wu, Yesterday, I talked with microcai(ibus-handwrite owner) and he said ibus-handwrite doesn't depend on zinnia from now on. He also recommend us to wait for the next stable version of ibus-handwrite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Peng Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||575005 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Bug 570731 depends on bug 562366, which changed state. Bug 562366 Summary: Review request: zinnia - online handwriting recognition system with machine learning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562366 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|ERRATA |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chen Lei 2010-03-13 00:39:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > The model file(SOURCE1) maybe come from Zinnia-Tomoe package, model can be > > compiled from model.txt file. > Hi Chen Lei, > Thanks for informing me this. > Would you like to co-maintain this package? > The updated srpm and spec is here: > Spec URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ime/ibus-handwrite.spec > SRPM URL: > http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ime/ibus-handwrite-1.2.0.20100205-2.fc12.src.rpm > The changes are: > 1. Use textual format of model data in zinnia-tomoe tar ball instead of binary > format file. (The model data need to be copied to ibus-handwrite data > sub-directory in order to let ibus-handwrite use the generated model data.) > 2. Bump the release to 2. > Please review the new package and spec. I think it's a good idea to package ibus-handwrite and zinnia-tomoe separately. It has several advantages: 1.ibus-handwrite and zinnia-tomoe have different upstreams, according to the package guideline fedora packages should make every effort to avoid having multiple, separate, upstream projects bundled together in a single package. 2. People using x86_64 PC normally install both i686 and x86_64 ibus to adapt to some legacy x32 programs. The model files are rather big files and also arch independent, if we include them in ibus-handwrite, people should download them twice. 3.Other program also use those model files, such as tegaki 4.Packaging zinnia-tomoe is rather a simple thing. So I recommand you to package ibus-handwrite and zinnia-tomoe separately, then create symlinks from model files to data dir. I'll review zinnia-tomoe for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #3 from Peng Wu 2010-03-11 21:42:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > The model file(SOURCE1) maybe come from Zinnia-Tomoe package, model can be > compiled from model.txt file. Hi Chen Lei, Thanks for informing me this. Would you like to co-maintain this package? The updated srpm and spec is here: Spec URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ime/ibus-handwrite.spec SRPM URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ime/ibus-handwrite-1.2.0.20100205-2.fc12.src.rpm The changes are: 1. Use textual format of model data in zinnia-tomoe tar ball instead of binary format file. (The model data need to be copied to ibus-handwrite data sub-directory in order to let ibus-handwrite use the generated model data.) 2. Bump the release to 2. Please review the new package and spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks||507684(F13Target) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercy...@163.com --- Comment #2 from Chen Lei 2010-03-10 07:37:35 EST --- The model file(SOURCE1) maybe come from Zinnia-Tomoe package, model can be compiled from model.txt file. % tar zxfv zinnia-tomoe-.tar.gz % zinnia-tomoe- % ./configure % make % su # make install See http://zinnia.sourceforge.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n CC||ccha...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #1 from Peng Wu 2010-03-05 03:55:06 EST --- Wait for the zinnia package. (see also: #562366) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Peng Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||562366 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
