[Bug 579428] Package Review: w3af - Web Application Attach and Audit Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579428 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|563471(FE-SECLAB) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 12:51:25 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579428] Package Review: w3af - Web Application Attach and Audit Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579428
Till Maas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||opensou...@till.name
--- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2010-06-30 10:15:56 EDT ---
Some issues I found at first sight:
1) the manpage does not need to be gziped manually, this is done automatically
by rpm
2) The complex License tag should have a comment explaining why it is that
complicated
3) for the locales find-lang.sh should be used (see package guidelines)
4) the correct SF.net download URL is
downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-1.0-rc3.tar.bz2 iirc (see Source
guidelines)
5) The patches need comments explaining why they are not upstreamable or if
they are, what there upstream status is e.g. a pointer to the upstream tracker
with the patch would be good. And please add a date to these comments
If you need detailed URLs to the mentioned guidelines, please ask and I will
provide them.
And please provide links to unofficial reviews you performed, if you did some.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579428] Package Review: w3af - Web Application Attach and Audit Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579428 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579428] Package Review: w3af - Web Application Attach and Audit Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579428 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-17 08:38:45 EST --- Were the licensing issues ever clarified? Any response to Till's commentary above? At this point few people will spend time looking at this ticket if you don't respond to existing commentary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579428] Package Review: w3af - Web Application Attach and Audit Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579428 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Security CC||re...@seznam.cz Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR), ||563471(FE-SECSPIN) Alias||w3af -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579428] Package Review: w3af - Web Application Attach and Audit Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579428 Josh Bressers (Security Response Team) changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|Security| CC||bress...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Josh Bressers (Security Response Team) 2010-04-05 07:52:28 EDT --- While this package has a security relevance, the Security keyword is for security flaws. I'm removing the keyword. Thanks for adding this, it should prove useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579428] Package Review: w3af - Web Application Attach and Audit Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579428 --- Comment #2 from Michal Ambroz 2010-04-06 15:03:53 EDT --- This will be long run I guess. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2010-April/001213.html Tom "spot" Callaway pointed out that the package as it is could be complicated from the licensing point of view. GPLv2 is incompatible with GPLv3. Any help with review/comments/suggestions/packing dependencies are welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
