[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell

2010-12-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard||BuildFails

--- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-12-22 14:52:50 EST 
---
The package fails to build.  Please clear the whiteboard if providing a package
which builds.

/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++  -O2 -g -pipe -Wall
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic   -o bin/clish  bin/clish.o
libclish.la -ltinyrl -ltinyxml -llub -lpthread  
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ltinyrl
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ltinyxml
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -llub
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [bin/tclish] Error 1

You should always do either a local mock build or a koji scratch build of every
package you submit.  Here's a failing scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2685087

In addition, please do not attach source packages to the wiki; it's really not
a general file transfer service.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell

2010-04-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830

--- Comment #11 from Devil Wang  2010-04-26 11:20:18 EDT ---
update for new SPEC file and new srpm file


Spec URL:


SRPM URL: 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell

2010-04-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830

Devil Wang  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell

2010-04-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830

--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt  2010-04-26 05:42:54 
EDT ---
* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories

* The explicit "ldconfig" dependency for the -devel package is not needed and
not true:
>
> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}, ldconfig

* The package descriptions are very poor:
>
> %description
> Command Line Interface. 

> %description devel 
> Develop Libraries and head files for Clish

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell

2010-04-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830

--- Comment #9 from Andrea Musuruane  2010-04-26 05:40:40 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Cause the lasted SPEC did not modify any source code or patches , We can 
> assume
> the lasted SPEC as the origin SPEC.
> 
> So , there is no use to update the changelog for further.

Yes there is. Any time you change something, even the SPEC file, you must bump
the release number and update the changelog. Otherwise it is very difficult to
follow what you are doing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell

2010-04-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830

--- Comment #8 from Devil Wang  2010-04-25 21:57:45 EDT ---
Cause the lasted SPEC did not modify any source code or patches , We can assume
the lasted SPEC as the origin SPEC.

So , there is no use to update the changelog for further.

One more question , if my package could be pushed in to the yum list or some
other source list for further checking now?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell

2010-04-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830

--- Comment #7 from Terje Røsten  2010-04-25 13:26:34 
EDT ---
The use of %configure is correct, no need to add --prefix.

The updated spec looks better, however please add a proper changelog so it's
possible to follow what you have done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell

2010-04-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830

--- Comment #6 from Devil Wang  2010-04-23 10:53:23 EDT ---
In my opinion, the prefix /usr/ is the default parameter for configure .

so , there is no need to add this parameter after configure.

And , I will update the SPEC file for clish package as soon as quickly in
session of Describe to add more info about this software.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell

2010-04-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830

Caius 'kaio' Chance  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ccha...@redhat.com

--- Comment #4 from Caius 'kaio' Chance  2010-04-23 
10:03:16 EDT ---
Okay, as you are not a packager yet, I couldn't do the whole process for
getting you to be a Fedora Packager. All I am doing as follows are prereview to
get your package closer to be approved:

(In reply to comment #3)
> Spec URL: 

* Why your description is shorter than the Summary? Description should be more
detail instead by common sense (or at least same amount of content).

* At %configure, have you put --prefix=/usr ? (that should be a macro which
could help).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell

2010-04-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830

--- Comment #5 from Caius 'kaio' Chance  2010-04-23 
10:06:12 EDT ---
# %description
#Command Line Interface
# A modular framework for implementing a CISCO-like CLI on a *NIX system. 
# Arbitary command menus and actions can be defined using XML files. This
#  software handles the user interaction, and forks the appropriate system 
# commands to perform any actions. 
# 

Tejie: Too long line, keep < 80 chars.

What Terje said was "the width of each line should be less than 80 chars, but
not just cut off the contents from the 2nd line.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell

2010-04-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830

--- Comment #3 from Devil Wang  2010-04-16 07:24:30 EDT ---
Spec URL: 
SRPM URL: 

I have updated the SPEC and  SRC-RPM files .

and hope it works.

you can verify the package according to the urls marked before.

Thanks & Regards

Devil_Wang

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell

2010-04-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830

--- Comment #2 from Terje Røsten  2010-04-11 11:03:02 
EDT ---
Some comments:

# Summary:Command Line Interface
That's seems a bit short.

# Group: Applications
Wrong, might be System Environment/Shells

# License:   GPL 
Wrong, must specify version GPL v1, v2 or v3?

# URL:
Please fill in.

# Source0:  
http://sourceforge.net/projects/clish/files/clish/0.7.3/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
 
Wrong, ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net

# BuildRequires:  autoconf
# BuildRequires:  automake
# BuildRequires:  libtool

Is those needed?

# %description
#Command Line Interface
# A modular framework for implementing a CISCO-like CLI on a *NIX system. 
# Arbitary command menus and actions can be defined using XML files. This
#  software handles the user interaction, and forks the appropriate system 
# commands to perform any actions. 
# 

Too long line, keep < 80 chars.

# %install
# rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
# make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT

Add INSTALL="install -p" to preserve timestamps

# install -d ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/clish
# install -m 775 xml-examples/* ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/clish/

ditto.

# %files
# %defattr(644,root,root,755)

use %defattr(-,root,root,-)

# %doc 

Empty?

# %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/lib*.so.*.*
# %attr(755,root,root) %{_bindir}/*
# %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/lib*.so
# %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/lib*.so.*

Remove %attr and list files a bit more explicit.

# %{_libdir}/lib*.la

Don't include la files, remove in install

# %{_includedir}/clish/*.h
# %{_includedir}/lub/*.h
# %{_includedir}/tinyrl/*.h
# %{_includedir}/tinyxml/*.h

Move to devel subpackage

# %{_libdir}/lib*.a
Don't include a files, remove in install

%{_sysconfdir}/clish/*.xml
%{_sysconfdir}/clish/*.txt
%{_sysconfdir}/clish/README
%{_sysconfdir}/clish/*.am

I would prefer only *.xml here 
(real config files in /etc, for documentation use %doc)

# %define date%(echo `LC_ALL="C" date +"%a %b %d %Y"`)

A new one, please remove and use the common pattern.

# %changelog
# * %{date}   Devil Wang 
# - Initial Introduction 

Not according to guidelines.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell

2010-04-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830

Terje Røsten  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|low |medium
 CC||terje...@phys.ntnu.no
   Platform|i686|All
Version|13  |rawhide
Summary|Review Request: < Clish > - |Review Request: Clish -
   |  |Shell

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review