[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-05-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Orion Poplawski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||or...@cora.nwra.com

--- Comment #16 from Orion Poplawski  2011-05-05 01:29:57 
EDT ---
Guido - looks like a F15 build has been done, but you need to submit an update.
 Please do so.  I need objenesis for some stuff I'm looking to package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  
2011-05-09 07:23:44 EDT ---
objenesis-1.2-7.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/objenesis-1.2-7.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Guido Grazioli  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2011-05-09 07:25:21

--- Comment #18 from Guido Grazioli  2011-05-09 
07:25:21 EDT ---
build done, closing

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-06-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  
2011-06-02 14:51:59 EDT ---
objenesis-1.2-7.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-06-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||objenesis-1.2-7.fc15
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-01-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

--- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli  2011-01-17 
18:42:05 EST ---
objenesis build in rawhide is now fixed:

koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2727346
specfile:
http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/objenesis/objenesis.spec
SRPM:
http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/objenesis/objenesis-1.2-3.fc15.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-01-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

--- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov  2011-01-18 
03:02:30 EST ---
Few comments:
* Drop buildroot
* Drop clean section
* Don't install versioned jars
* Do we really need maven2-settings.xml and all the sed edits?
* Does it build with maven 3? If yes please switch to using it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-02-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

--- Comment #5 from Guido Grazioli  2011-02-04 
08:26:41 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Few comments:
> * Drop buildroot
> * Drop clean section
> * Don't install versioned jars
> * Do we really need maven2-settings.xml and all the sed edits?
> * Does it build with maven 3? If yes please switch to using it.

ok i did a major cleanup of the specfile and tested the build with maven3,
which completed successfully:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2761796
(maven2 is still pulled in the package sack for some dependency though)

SPEC and SRPM: 
http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/objenesis/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-02-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Guido Grazioli  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard|NotReady|

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-02-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Alexander Kurtakov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov  2011-02-17 
13:47:30 EST ---
I'll do this one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-02-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

--- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov  2011-02-17 
14:11:30 EST ---
Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x]  Rpmlint output:
objenesis.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US newInstance -> new
Instance, new-instance, instance
objenesis.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subclassed ->
subclasses, sub classed, sub-classed
objenesis.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/objenesis
Not a problem
[x]  Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x]  Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]  Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x]  Buildroot definition is not present
[x]  Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[!]  License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: MIT in spec, ASL 2.0 actually
[-]  If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[-]  All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x]  Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]  Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]  All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x]  Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]  Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]  Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]  Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]  Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x]  Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x]  Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x]  Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-]  Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x]  Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]  Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]  Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x]  Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x]  Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x]  Package uses %global not %define
[x]  If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-]  If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x]  All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x]  Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x]  If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x]  pom files has correct add_to_maven_depmap call which resolves to the pom
file (use "JPP." and "JPP-" correctly)

=== Maven ===
[x]  Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[!]  If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a
comment!
Please comment
[-]  If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven2.jpp.depmap.file=*" explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x]  Package uses %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]  Packages have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils (for
%update_maven_depmap macro)

=== Other suggestions ===
[x]  If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x]  Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x]  Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x]  Latest version is packaged.

=== Issues ===
1. License field in the spec is wrong.
2. Please comment why tests are skipped
3. Please mvn-rpmbuild instead of mvn-local it is supposed to exactly what we
need for rpm builds.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

--- Comment #8 from Guido Grazioli  2011-02-24 
04:38:17 EST ---
Thanks, fixed.
SPEC and SRPM: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/objenesis/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Alexander Kurtakov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #9 from Alexander Kurtakov  2011-02-24 
04:51:42 EST ---
Looks good.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Alexander Kurtakov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG)  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Guido Grazioli  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #10 from Guido Grazioli  2011-02-24 
09:35:32 EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: objenesis
Short Description: A library for instantiating Java objects
Owners: guidograzioli
Branches: F-14 F-15
InitialCC: java-sig

Thanks

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

--- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts  2011-02-24 13:26:38 EST 
---
This ticket is not assigned to anyone.  It should be assigned to the reviewer.

Please fix and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Alexander Kurtakov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com

--- Comment #12 from Alexander Kurtakov  2011-02-24 
13:35:56 EST ---
Sorry about that, I forgot to assign the bug to me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Guido Grazioli  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #13 from Guido Grazioli  2011-02-24 
14:37:00 EST ---
It passed unnoticed under my eyes too, sorry for that.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

--- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts  2011-02-24 22:09:31 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2011-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

--- Comment #15 from Alexander Kurtakov  2011-03-23 
09:33:14 EDT ---
Guido, would you please close the bug if you have built it?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2010-11-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Bug 590681 depends on bug 590680, which changed state.

Bug 590680 Summary: Review Request: maven-license-plugin - Maven plugin to 
update header licenses of source files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590680

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Alexander Kurtakov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||akurt...@redhat.com

--- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov  2010-11-18 
15:39:34 EST ---
Guido,
Do you still want someone to do the review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

--- Comment #2 from Guido Grazioli  2010-11-18 
16:15:05 EST ---
Sure, objenesis 1.2 is still the latest release, but the specfile needs updates
for the brand new guidelines and i dont know if it currently builds on rawhide
as i only use it on a f13. Will follow up as soon i have things sorted

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2010-11-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard||NotReady

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects

2010-05-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681

Guido Grazioli  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||590680

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review