[Bug 591857] Review Request: maven-resources-plugin - Maven Resources Plugin

2010-05-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591857

Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE

--- Comment #8 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-05-20 
08:13:21 EDT ---
Koji build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=174287

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 591857] Review Request: maven-resources-plugin - Maven Resources Plugin

2010-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591857

huwang huw...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 591857] Review Request: maven-resources-plugin - Maven Resources Plugin

2010-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591857

--- Comment #6 from huwang huw...@redhat.com 2010-05-18 02:52:14 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: maven-resources-plugin
Short Description: Maven Resources Plugin
Owners: huwang
Branches: 
InitialCC: akurtakov,yyang,weli

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 591857] Review Request: maven-resources-plugin - Maven Resources Plugin

2010-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591857

Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+

--- Comment #7 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2010-05-18 14:25:16 EDT ---
CVS Done

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 591857] Review Request: maven-resources-plugin - Maven Resources Plugin

2010-05-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591857

Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||akurt...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-05-17 
07:52:29 EDT ---
I'm taking this one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 591857] Review Request: maven-resources-plugin - Maven Resources Plugin

2010-05-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591857

--- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-05-17 
09:45:27 EDT ---
Review:

OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. OUTPUT:
maven-resources-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation
maven-resources-plugin.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/maven/fragments/maven-resources-plugin
maven-resources-plugin.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
maven-resources-plugin-2.2.tar.gz

Not a problem. 

OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. 
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. 
OK: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. 
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. 
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. 
OK: Each package must consistently use macros.
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. 
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. Javadocs
subpackage.
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application. 
OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. 
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

One small problem only:
install -pm 644 pom.xml \
%{buildroot}%{_mavenpomdir}/JPP.%{name}.pom 
should be
install -pm 644 pom.xml \
%{buildroot}%{_mavenpomdir}/JPP-%{name}.pom

This is needed for proper finding of the pom.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 591857] Review Request: maven-resources-plugin - Maven Resources Plugin

2010-05-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591857

--- Comment #4 from huwang huw...@redhat.com 2010-05-17 11:21:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
 Review:
 
 OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. OUTPUT:
 maven-resources-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation
 maven-resources-plugin.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
 /etc/maven/fragments/maven-resources-plugin
 maven-resources-plugin.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
 maven-resources-plugin-2.2.tar.gz
 
 Not a problem. 
 
 OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
 OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. 
 OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
 OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
 Licensing Guidelines .
 OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. 
 OK: The spec file must be written in American English.
 OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. 
 OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
 least one primary architecture.
 OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any 
 that
 are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion 
 of
 those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
 OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
 OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
 OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
 %files listings. 
 OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. 
 OK: Each package must consistently use macros.
 OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. 
 OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. Javadocs
 subpackage.
 OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
 the application. 
 OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
 packages. 
 OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
 
 One small problem only:
 install -pm 644 pom.xml \
 %{buildroot}%{_mavenpomdir}/JPP.%{name}.pom 
 should be
 install -pm 644 pom.xml \
 %{buildroot}%{_mavenpomdir}/JPP-%{name}.pom
 
 This is needed for proper finding of the pom.
Fixed.
Spec URL:
http://code.google.com/p/tobepackagemaintaner/downloads/detail?name=maven-resources-plugin.speccan=2q=#makechanges
SPRM URL:
http://code.google.com/p/tobepackagemaintaner/downloads/detail?name=maven-resources-plugin-2.2-2.src.rpmcan=2q=#makechanges

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 591857] Review Request: maven-resources-plugin - Maven Resources Plugin

2010-05-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591857

Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)  |
   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-05-17 
11:33:28 EDT ---
Thanks,

This package is APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 591857] Review Request: maven-resources-plugin - Maven Resources Plugin

2010-05-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591857

Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||methe...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2010-05-14 07:00:16 EDT 
---
Since you are looking for a sponsor,  refer to

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 591857] Review Request: maven-resources-plugin - Maven Resources Plugin

2010-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591857

huwang huw...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review