[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2011-02-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||drobo-utils-0.6.2.2-9.fc14
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-02-04 14:52:16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2011-02-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-02-04 14:52:10 EST ---
drobo-utils-0.6.2.2-9.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2011-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-01-19 16:02:29 EST ---
drobo-utils-0.6.2.2-9.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.
 If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update drobo-utils'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drobo-utils-0.6.2.2-9.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2011-01-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2011-01-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-01-18 14:48:06 EST ---
drobo-utils-0.6.2.2-9.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drobo-utils-0.6.2.2-9.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2011-01-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

--- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-18 01:54:29 
EST ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2011-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

Jameson imntr...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #13 from Jameson imntr...@gmail.com 2011-01-15 14:59:45 EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: drobo-utils
Short Description: Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems
Owners: imntreal
Branches: f14
InitialCC: imntreal

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2011-01-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-04 19:39:58 EST 
---
Thanks; following the about dialog is the only thing we can do without
clarification from upstream.  If you get that clarification, please include the
email in the package as documentation.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2010-12-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-14 10:26:22 EST 
---
Actually if you use the latest rpmlint you get no complaints from the srpm and
just these from the built rpm:
  drobo-utils-gui.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
   /etc/security/console.apps/droboview-root
  drobo-utils-gui.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
   /etc/pam.d/droboview-root
  drobo-utils-gui.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary droboview-root
which are all OK.

I'm having trouble figuring out the license.  The code itself doesn't have the
proper license blocks and just refers to the COPYING file.  The COPYING file
just has the generic GPLv3 text, which says (see section 14) that unless the
code specifically indicates a version, you can use any version.  The README
files and upstream web site just say GPL.  The About dialog for the GUI says:
  license: General Public License (GPL) v3
and you have GPLv3+ in the spec.

At this point I'd go with the About dialog and use GPLv3, but you should ask
upstream to clarify and if possible put proper GPL license blocks in their
code.  The COPYING file itself indicates how to do this, down at the bottom
under How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs.

Other than the license issue I think this is fine.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
  00f2bc162c0050da9630d3134ef4317c042fec22c558f2933c7f936bfea4ebf6
   drobo-utils-0.6.2.2.tgz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summaries are OK.
* descriptions are OK.
* dist tag is present.
X license field does not match the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  drobo-utils-0.6.2.2-8.fc15.noarch.rpm
   drobo-utils = 0.6.2.2-8.fc15
  =
   /usr/bin/python  
   parted  
   python(abi) = 2.7
   python-ctypes  

  drobo-utils-gui-0.6.2.2-8.fc15.noarch.rpm
   config(drobo-utils-gui) = 0.6.2.2-8.fc15
   drobo-utils-gui = 0.6.2.2-8.fc15
  =
   /bin/sh  
   PyQt4  
   config(drobo-utils-gui) = 0.6.2.2-8.fc15
   drobo-utils  
   usermode  

* no bundled libraries.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* desktop files valid and installed properly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2010-12-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

--- Comment #7 from Jameson imntr...@gmail.com 2010-12-13 11:22:40 EST ---
Removing the CFLAGS line gives me:
error: cannot copy tree 'build/scripts-2.7': not a directory

Here's an update without the old pam lines:
http://imntreal.fedorapeople.org/drobo-utils-0.6.2.2-7.fc14.src.rpm
http://imntreal.fedorapeople.org/drobo-utils.spec

Current rpmlint output:
drobo-utils.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
drobo-utils.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
drobo-utils.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag
drobo-utils.spec: W: no-%clean-section

drobo-utils-gui.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
/etc/security/console.apps/droboview-root
drobo-utils-gui.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
/etc/pam.d/droboview-root
drobo-utils-gui.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary droboview-root

Excuse my confusion.  This is the first package I've worked on that needed GUI
sudo, and my first python package.  I can testify that it currently functions
properly on my system, but it would be nice if there were more people out there
with the hardware to test it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2010-12-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter|

--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-13 13:49:49 EST 
---
I believe I already addressed the CFLAGS bit, didn't I?  You don't remove the
whole line, you just remove the setting of CFLAGS from the line (since it's
completely pointless as nothing is calling a C compiler).  Obviously if you
don't call python at all then the package doesn't build.

Maybe it's better if I just show what the %build section would look like:

%build
%{__python} -c 'import setuptools; execfile(setup.py)' build
sed -i -e s/\#\!\/.*//g DroboGUI.py

That builds fine for me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2010-12-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

--- Comment #9 from Jameson imntr...@gmail.com 2010-12-13 14:14:56 EST ---
Sorry, I got'cha, now.

http://imntreal.fedorapeople.org/drobo-utils-0.6.2.2-8.fc14.src.rpm

SPEC is in the same place.  Everything seems ok.  Still have the same rpmlint
warnings, but I don't think anything can be done about those.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2010-12-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2010-12-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||p...@city-fan.org

--- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-12-01 05:03:45 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
 Also, rpmlint has a complaint I've not seen before:
 
 drobo-utils-gui.noarch: E: use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/droboview-root (line 
 4)
 
 The implication is that pam files are supposed to use include instead of the
 pam_stack module.  Honestly I can't tell you how to do that.

Removing these lines from the spec should do the trick:

# Detect whether the system is using pam_stack
perl -pi -e's,include(\s*)(.*),required\1pam_stack.so service=\2,'
droboview.pam
touch -r %{SOURCE3} droboview.pam

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2010-11-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-11-30 22:02:45 EST 
---
Well, you still need to have the python call; you just don't need to set
CFLAGS:
  %{__python} -c 'import setuptools; execfile(setup.py)' build
The compiler is not called during the build.

Also, rpmlint has a complaint I've not seen before:

drobo-utils-gui.noarch: E: use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/droboview-root (line 4)

The implication is that pam files are supposed to use include instead of the
pam_stack module.  Honestly I can't tell you how to do that.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2010-11-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

--- Comment #4 from Jameson imntr...@gmail.com 2010-11-26 15:48:54 EST ---
Without the CFLAGS line, I get:
running install_scripts
error: cannot copy tree 'build/scripts-2.7': not a directory

Could this actually be compiling something?  The author said that it no longer
does.  This is my first Python package, so some of it is a bit strange.  I
think I have everything else cleaned up.

New SRPM:  http://imntreal.fedorapeople.org/drobo-utils-0.6.2.2-6.fc14.src.rpm
New SPEC:  http://imntreal.fedorapeople.org/drobo-utils.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2010-11-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-11-23 13:10:07 EST 
---
I haven't the hardware to test this, and I suspect that no other review has any
either, which would explain why you've had no comments on this ticket.  But I'm
just trying to clear out the old ones, and this package seems clean and simple
enough.  Here are some comments.

You can remove the 0%{?fedora}  12 conditional; all supported Fedora releases
will meet it.  You can also remove mention of %python_sitearch, since you don't
use it.  (You could remove the whole thing at the top if you only intend to
target Fedora and RHEL6.  You could then also remove BuildRoot, %clean and the
buildroot cleaning in %install.)

I don't understand why you test for pam_stack in %prep.  You control what's on
the buildsystem based on the build dependencies you list, and you should know
what each Fedora release supports.  You can't test what's on the end-user
system at package build time.

Your %post and %postun scripts do not conform to those given in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database

I don't understand why you make a point of passing CFLAGS in %build, given that
this is a noarch package and the C compiler is not being called.

In ssome places you reference %{buildroot} while in others, $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. 
You need to be consistent.  (Personally I prefer the one with fewer
characters.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2010-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

--- Comment #2 from Jameson imntr...@gmail.com 2010-05-21 13:10:40 EDT ---
rpmlint is quiet except for a spelling warning.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems

2010-05-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772

--- Comment #1 from Jameson imntr...@gmail.com 2010-05-16 18:18:55 EDT ---
Updated the SPEC, and SRPM:
http://imntreal.fedorapeople.org/drobo-utils-0.6.2.2-5.fc12.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review