[Bug 598376] Review Request: maven-one-plugin - Maven One Plugin

2010-06-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598376

Yang Yong yy...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #11 from Yang Yong yy...@redhat.com 2010-06-08 07:15:26 EDT ---
Kevin, cvs is not done after 12 hours passed, may caused by wrong CC, please
create cvs again and leave CC blank, thanks.

New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: maven-one-plugin
Short Description: Plugin provides some integration tasks with Maven 1.x
Owners: yyang
Branches: devel
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 598376] Review Request: maven-one-plugin - Maven One Plugin

2010-06-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598376

Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 598376] Review Request: maven-one-plugin - Maven One Plugin

2010-06-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598376

Yang Yong yy...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE

--- Comment #12 from Yang Yong yy...@redhat.com 2010-06-08 22:59:45 EDT ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=177389

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 598376] Review Request: maven-one-plugin - Maven One Plugin

2010-06-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598376

Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+

--- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-06-07 17:27:31 EDT ---
cvs done, except liweinan account doesn't exist.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 598376] Review Request: maven-one-plugin - Maven One Plugin

2010-06-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598376

--- Comment #5 from Yang Yong yy...@redhat.com 2010-06-03 03:08:10 EDT ---
Added changelog, and used bz2, please review.

Spec URL: http://yyang.fedorapeople.org/maven2/maven-one-plugin.spec
SRPM URL: http://yyang.fedorapeople.org/maven2/maven-one-plugin-1.2-2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 598376] Review Request: maven-one-plugin - Maven One Plugin

2010-06-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598376

Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #6 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-06-03 
07:58:52 EDT ---
I re-checked. Package seems good. Make only two corrections before you commit
to CVS:
 * fix comment about creating tarball. It still has instructions for tar.bz.
 * remove epoch from changelog. Your package is providing old name
(maven2-plugin-one) with epoch 1 but itself it has no epoch. Sorry I didn't
notice before..


These issues are not serious and can be fixed easily...

This package is APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 598376] Review Request: maven-one-plugin - Maven One Plugin

2010-06-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598376

--- Comment #7 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-06-03 
08:04:04 EDT ---
Oh, and also there is a small typo in the changelog (privodes)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 598376] Review Request: maven-one-plugin - Maven One Plugin

2010-06-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598376

--- Comment #8 from Yang Yong yy...@redhat.com 2010-06-03 22:20:27 EDT ---
Thanks, I have fixed those 3 issues.

This is the latest version of SPEC and SRPM:
Spec URL: http://yyang.fedorapeople.org/maven2/maven-one-plugin.spec
SRPM URL: http://yyang.fedorapeople.org/maven2/maven-one-plugin-1.2-3.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 598376] Review Request: maven-one-plugin - Maven One Plugin

2010-06-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598376

Yang Yong yy...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 598376] Review Request: maven-one-plugin - Maven One Plugin

2010-06-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598376

--- Comment #9 from Yang Yong yy...@redhat.com 2010-06-03 23:09:38 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: maven-one-plugin
Short Description: Plugin provides some integration tasks with Maven 1.x
Owners: yyang
Branches: devel
InitialCC: huwang liweinan akurtako dbhole

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 598376] Review Request: maven-one-plugin - Maven One Plugin

2010-06-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598376

--- Comment #4 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-06-02 
04:31:02 EDT ---
First thing: The spec you linked to and spec inside SRPM don't match.
Second: Whenever you make change to a spec file (even during review) you are
supposed to raise revision number and add changes to changelog.

Because of different spec file I won't continue review now, so if you can,
please raise revision to 2, and add those changes to changelog.

As for xz compression...It will take some time for these changes to appear in
RHEL anyway, but OK..at least use bz2 compression.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 598376] Review Request: maven-one-plugin - Maven One Plugin

2010-06-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598376

--- Comment #2 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-06-01 
09:55:22 EDT ---
NEEDSWORK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.

maven-one-plugin.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml - XML, ml, x
ml
maven-one-plugin.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugins - plug
ins, plug-ins, plugging
maven-one-plugin.src: E: description-line-too-long C * Helps you to switch your
project from Maven 1 to Maven 2 by converting your project.xml to a pom.xml
maven-one-plugin.src: E: description-line-too-long C * Provides a packaging
mechanism for Maven 1.x plugins, building them using Maven 2.0
maven-one-plugin.src: E: description-line-too-long C * Provides a hook for
installation that will copy built artifacts into a local or remote Maven 1.x
repository, for concurrent development with Maven 1.x projects
maven-one-plugin.src: W: strange-permission maven-one-plugin-jpp-depmap.xml
0764L
maven-one-plugin.src: W: invalid-url Source0: maven-one-plugin-1.2.tar.gz
maven-one-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml - XML,
ml, x ml
maven-one-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugins -
plug ins, plug-ins, plugging
maven-one-plugin.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C * Helps you to switch
your project from Maven 1 to Maven 2 by converting your project.xml to a
pom.xml
maven-one-plugin.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C * Provides a packaging
mechanism for Maven 1.x plugins, building them using Maven 2.0
maven-one-plugin.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C * Provides a hook for
installation that will copy built artifacts into a local or remote Maven 1.x
repository, for concurrent development with Maven 1.x projects
maven-one-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation
maven-one-plugin.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/maven/fragments/maven-one-plugin
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 8 warnings.

There are two main errors:
 * You need to make sure lines are not overly long (I believe they
 have to be under 80 characters. Your editor should automatically
 insert newline when editing the spec file)
 * Permissions of depmap are weird (just chmod it to 644)


OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.  .
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. 
OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
OK: The spec file must be written in American English. 
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. 
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. 
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a
directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that
directory. 
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. 
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line. 
OK: Each package must consistently use macros. 

But :-) It's possible to condense 2 calls of install from:
install -d -m 0755 %{buildroot}%{_javadir}
install -m 644 target/%{name}-%{version}.jar  
%{buildroot}%{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar

to (this will create dest dir automatically):
install -Dpm 644 target/%{name}-%{version}.jar  
%{buildroot}%{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar

It's just a suggestion though...

OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. 
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of
large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). 
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, 

[Bug 598376] Review Request: maven-one-plugin - Maven One Plugin

2010-06-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598376

--- Comment #3 from Yang Yong yy...@redhat.com 2010-06-01 22:18:55 EDT ---
Hi Stanislav, SPEC and SRPM are updated, please review again.

fix log:

* You need to make sure lines are not overly long (I believe they
 have to be under 80 characters. Your editor should automatically
 insert newline when editing the spec file)

FIXED

* Permissions of depmap are weird (just chmod it to 644)

FIXED

* You need to obsolete version 0:2.0.8 and provide 1:%{version}-%{release}
  your obsoletes would not obsolete current version of one plugin.

FIXED

* It would be good to put comment why test failure is ignored.
  Actually  in this case maven-one-plugin has no tests so that line
  serves no purpose. It's just causing confusion, so please remove
  it.

FIXED

* While you are at it, use xz compression for our own tarballs. It's
  smaller and fully supported. You can create them with:
  tar acf maven-one-plugin-1.2.tar.gz maven-one-plugin-1.2/

DECLINED, there is still no tar 2.x in RHEL.

* Improve summary text. It'd better if it said something like:
 Plugin to support integration with Maven 1.x
 Maven One Plugin will not tell me much when I do yum search... 

FIXED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review