[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-06 13:29:22 EST --- I happen to have a need for this package, and an also a sponsor. I see you've submitted several packages, but at least jags seems to be held up in review. Are you still interested in submitting these packages to Fedora? If so I'll try to work out what the hold up is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517 --- Comment #12 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-01-07 03:29:29 EST --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2011-01-19 17:47:32 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pin...@pingoured.fr --- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2010-06-04 18:59:39 EDT --- As a quick look at the spec: - The URL is not correct - The BuildRequires to tetex-latex has to be updated - The Requires for post and postun can be removed - you might want to change the Requires from R to R-core - You have a double dependency on R in your BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517 --- Comment #2 from chris desjardins 2010-06-04 19:20:44 EDT --- Thanks. I have updated the *.spec and *src.rpm file. The url in my original description box should reflect this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517 --- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2010-06-04 19:24:05 EDT --- Please update the release and the changelog when you change something on the spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517 --- Comment #4 from chris desjardins 2010-06-04 20:05:36 EDT --- Here is the new spec and the new src.rpm http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1501309/Fedora/R-coda.spec http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1501309/Fedora/R-coda-0.13.5-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517
--- Comment #5 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2010-06-05 08:32:40
EDT ---
Pre-review (I am not intitled to sponsor you):
* Latest version packaged
88d149271be44968f36ebd31f530ba0b68e5830e coda_0.13-5.tar.gz
88d149271be44968f36ebd31f530ba0b68e5830e
/home/pierrey/rpmbuild/SOURCES/coda_0.13-5.tar.gz
* sha1sum are equals
* All required Requires are present
* All required BuildRequires are present
* There is 1 %dir
%dir is OK
* There is 3 %doc
%doc is OK
* The rpm installed in _datadir
* The rpm uses %{_datadir} and is noarch
* The rpm seems to have the required element in %install
* Build properly under 2.6.33.5-112.fc13.x86_64
* rpmlint:
R-coda.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mcmc -> McMahon, McCoy, McCray
R-coda.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mcmc -> McMahon, McCoy, McCray
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
* Output from rpmlint safe to ignore
Scratch build on koji for target f14
* Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2231733
0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed
2231733 build (dist-f14, R-coda-0.13.5-2.fc13.src.rpm) completed
successfully
* Build logs are clean
* %check is present
* All check are passed
* License is GPLv2+ and is valid for Fedora
! The file Thin.R in the R folder is an empty file
! The URL is still not valid
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517 --- Comment #6 from chris desjardins 2010-06-05 09:38:39 EDT --- Thanks. For continuing to review this. re: The spelling error ... MCMC is spelled MCMC so that's fine re: The file Thin.R in the R folder is an empty file I don't have a Thin.R in R-coda.rpm, I do have a thin.html (or do you mean line.R (because that has data too)). [lon...@goddard ~]$ rpm -ql R-coda /usr/share/R/library/coda /usr/share/R/library/coda/COPYING /usr/share/R/library/coda/DESCRIPTION /usr/share/R/library/coda/INDEX /usr/share/R/library/coda/Meta /usr/share/R/library/coda/Meta/Rd.rds /usr/share/R/library/coda/Meta/data.rds /usr/share/R/library/coda/Meta/hsearch.rds /usr/share/R/library/coda/Meta/links.rds /usr/share/R/library/coda/Meta/nsInfo.rds /usr/share/R/library/coda/Meta/package.rds /usr/share/R/library/coda/NAMESPACE /usr/share/R/library/coda/R /usr/share/R/library/coda/R/coda /usr/share/R/library/coda/R/coda.rdb /usr/share/R/library/coda/R/coda.rdx /usr/share/R/library/coda/data /usr/share/R/library/coda/data/line.R /usr/share/R/library/coda/help /usr/share/R/library/coda/help/AnIndex /usr/share/R/library/coda/help/aliases.rds /usr/share/R/library/coda/help/coda.rdb /usr/share/R/library/coda/help/coda.rdx /usr/share/R/library/coda/help/paths.rds /usr/share/R/library/coda/html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/00Index.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/Cramer.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/HPDinterval.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/as.ts.mcmc.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/autocorr.diag.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/autocorr.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/autocorr.plot.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/batchSE.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/bugs2jags.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/coda.options.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/codamenu.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/crosscorr.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/crosscorr.plot.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/cumuplot.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/densplot.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/effectiveSize.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/gelman.diag.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/gelman.plot.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/geweke.diag.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/geweke.plot.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/heidel.diag.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/linepost.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/mcmc.convert.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/mcmc.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/mcmc.list.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/mcmc.subset.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/mcmcUpgrade.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/mcpar.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/multi.menu.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/nchain.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/plot.mcmc.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/raftery.diag.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/read.and.check.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/read.coda.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/read.coda.interactive.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/read.openbugs.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/rejectionRate.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/spectrum0.ar.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/spectrum0.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/summary.mcmc.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/thin.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/time.mcmc.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/traceplot.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/trellisplots.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/varnames.html /usr/share/R/library/coda/html/window.mcmc.html Opening Firefox on thin.html shows a R help page. re: URL is still not valid I am stumped here. What should this look like? The URL field is the same in my spec file as it is here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:R. Should it be removed or should the Source0 field be updated to be more general? Can you give me a hint. Thanks! Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517 --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2010-06-05 11:25:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > re: The file Thin.R in the R folder is an empty file > > I don't have a Thin.R in R-coda.rpm, I do have a thin.html (or do you mean > line.R (because that has data too)). I meant Thin.R in the R folder of the sources. > re: URL is still not valid > > I am stumped here. What should this look like? The URL field is the same in my > spec file as it is here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:R. Should it > be removed or should the Source0 field be updated to be more general? Can you > give me a hint. The correct URL would be: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/coda/index.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517 --- Comment #8 from chris desjardins 2010-06-07 09:51:50 EDT --- Thin.R is empty in the original source as well. Is this a situation where I should contact upstream and ask them why there is nothing in this file? I've changed the URL in the spec file and the update spec and SRPM are available here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1501309/Fedora/R-coda.spec http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1501309/Fedora/R-coda-0.13.5-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517 --- Comment #9 from chris desjardins 2010-06-07 10:51:11 EDT --- re: Thin.R, I have heard back from the upstream author and he told me that it was a stray file that found its way into the build directory and has been removed in an upcoming version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517 Randall Berry changed: What|Removed |Added CC||randyn3...@gmail.com Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517
--- Comment #10 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2010-08-30
10:24:26 EDT ---
* Latest version packaged
88d149271be44968f36ebd31f530ba0b68e5830e coda_0.13-5.tar.gz
88d149271be44968f36ebd31f530ba0b68e5830e
/home/pingou/rpmbuild/SOURCES/coda_0.13-5.tar.gz
* sha1sum are equals
* All required Requires are present
* All required BuildRequires are present
* The macro %check is present
* There is 1 %dir
%dir is OK
* There is 3 %doc
? More element than expected in %doc
: COPYING
* The rpm installed in _datadir
* The rpm uses %{_datadir} and is noarch
* The rpm seems to have the required element in %install
LANG=C rpmbuild -ba /home/pierrey/rpmbuild/SPECS/R-coda.spec >
R-coda.spec-build.log 2>&1
* Build properly under 2.6.33.8-149.fc13.x86_64
* rpmlint:
R-coda.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mcmc -> McMahon, McCoy, McGee
R-coda.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mcmc -> McMahon, McCoy, McGee
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
* Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2435129
0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed
2435129 build (dist-f14, R-coda-0.13.5-3.fc13.src.rpm) completed
successfully
* Build is fine
* rpmlint's warnings are safe to ignore
* %check is present
* All test are passed successfully
I will approve this package as soon as you have been approved in the packager
group
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
