[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-08-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2010-08-19 17:57:30 EDT ---
x509watch-0.3.0-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-08-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc13  |x509watch-0.3.0-1.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-08-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|x509watch-0.3.0-1.el5   |x509watch-0.3.0-1.el4

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-08-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2010-08-19 17:58:06 EDT ---
x509watch-0.3.0-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-08-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2010-08-03 17:38:04 EDT ---
x509watch-0.3.0-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/x509watch-0.3.0-1.el4

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-08-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2010-08-03 17:38:21 EDT ---
x509watch-0.3.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/x509watch-0.3.0-1.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-08-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2010-08-02 20:43:57 EDT ---
x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-08-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc14  |x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-08-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2010-08-02 20:55:38 EDT ---
x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-08-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc12  |x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-08-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2010-08-01 15:20:05 EDT ---
x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-08-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc14
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-07-30 16:35:40 EDT ---
GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

with f14 branch added

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2010-07-30 17:40:10 EDT ---
x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2010-07-30 17:40:04 EDT ---
x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2010-07-30 17:39:56 EDT ---
x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2010-07-30 17:40:28 EDT ---
x509watch-0.2.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/x509watch-0.2.0-1.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

--- Comment #16 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2010-07-30 
17:43:40 EDT ---
x509watch-0.2.0-1.el4 Tag: dist-4E-epel-testing-candidate Status: complete 
x509watch-0.2.0-1.el5 Tag: dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate Status: complete 
x509watch-0.2.0-1.el6 Tag: dist-6E-epel Status: complete
x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc12 Tag: dist-f12-updates-candidate Status: complete
x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc13 Tag: dist-f13-updates-candidate Status: complete 
x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc14 Tag: dist-f14-updates-candidate Status: complete 
x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc15 Tag: dist-f15 Status: complete

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

Robert Scheck red...@linuxnetz.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck red...@linuxnetz.de 2010-07-28 02:24:14 EDT 
---
Manuel, thank you very much for the review.


New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: x509watch
Short Description: Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates
Owners: robert
Branches: EL-4 EL-5 EL-6 F-12 F-13
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2010-07-27 
14:44:19 EDT ---
Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/x509watch.spec
SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/x509watch-0.2.0-1.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review+

--- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2010-07-27 
19:26:13 EDT ---
Re-review:
New sha1sum:
 7ce87e8f735a6ceced6a537d50f4faa6f710c4d8  x509watch

[wo...@wolfy tmp]$ rpmlint x509watch*rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

No new problems spotted + previous issues solved.

= APPROVED =

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2010-07-26 
03:31:09 EDT ---
It seems there is something wrong, some old certificates that I have around are
not identified. For instance:


[r...@mail ~]# openssl x509 -in /etc/postfix/oldcert/postfix.pem  -noout
-enddate -startdate
notAfter=Nov  7 07:57:15 2009 GMT
notBefore=May 26 07:57:15 2008 GMT

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2010-07-26 
04:09:55 EDT ---
It gets ignored, because there's old in the path name.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2010-07-26 
04:15:41 EDT ---
it does not work even if I copy the certificate to /root or /tmp

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2010-07-26 
04:18:48 EDT ---
Ignore comment #2. Your /etc/postfix/oldcert/postfix.pem isn't the standard
PKI directory, which is always /etc/pki. But maybe a x509watch --directory 
/etc/pki --directory /etc/postfix is what you would like to use instead. As
alternative you might want to use x509watch --directory /etc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2010-07-26 
06:05:30 EDT ---
Package Review
==

Key:
 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
 [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
 Tested on: i386
 [x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM: empty
binary RPM:
x509watch.noarch: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/x509watch
Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent
upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an
executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig.
= See issue 1 below

 [x] Package is not relocatable.
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 License type: GPLv2+
 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
 SHA1SUM of source file: f74f4804aab7470d6a451d47438c54d839e926e0 
x509watch-0.1.0.tar.gz
See also issue 2 below
 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [-] The spec file handles locales properly.
 [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [x] Permissions on files are set properly.
 [x] Package consistently uses macros.
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
  [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 [x] Final provides and requires are sane.

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
 [x] Latest version is packaged.
 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
 [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
 Tested on: koji scratch build for EL-4
 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
 Tested on: koji scratch build for EL-4
 [!] Package functions as described.
See issue 3 below
 [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
 [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
 [-] File based requires are sane.
 [x] %check is present and the test passes.

=== OPTIONAL ITEMS ===
 [x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
 [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).

=== Issues ===
1. using  %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily/%{name}  is a bit odd
and identified as an error by rpmlint. Can you please explain the reason to
mark this script as config file ?
2. the site requires registration in order to download files. that's beyond
optimal as it breaks automatic testing. please consider switching to another
hosting site ( such as sourceforge for instance) if you cannot ensure proper /
normal access.
3. In Centos 4 the option -L passed to find is not recognised AND there is
no error triggered. Removing this option makes the program to behave normally.
 I suggest to improve error processing and more important, to stop using the
find tool and use the perl File::Find  (
http://search.cpan.org/~lbrocard/perl5.005_04/lib/File/Find.pm) module instead.
Your approach is prone to very simple attacks. As you can see below, you perl
commnand
  open(CERTS, find -L $directory -name '*.pem' -o -name '*.crt' 2 /dev/null
|);
is translated into:
 

[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2010-07-26 
19:05:38 EDT ---
- Point #1 is of course a mistake. Will fix this with the next SPEC/SRPM.
- Point #2 is not optimal, but according to Fedora Legal not a blocker; we've
  had this situation already at another package in the past.
- Point #3 is getting solved in the next release using perl's File::Find, 
  IPC::Open3 and Fcntl. Beside of that, I'm going to call /usr/bin/openssl
  per default, but this can be overwritten if needed using a parameter.

Will likely push new release today or tomorrow and afterwards new SPEC/SRPM.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review