[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #18 from Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org 2010-08-12 05:40:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) Kevin is asking in which name you want to have this software registered on Fedora package database, and to clarify this is asking to fix either the summary of _this bugzilla's summary_ (i.e. to change the summary of this bugzilla entry to Review request: gold - Allocation Manager, or to change the package name in SCM request. Ah I understand now, thanks. I did not know there was a requirement for that. I had assumed that package name == rpm name, rather than software name. It is not at all clear what most of the fields are from the wiki page on review requests. I will submit a new SCM request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #19 from Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org 2010-08-12 05:41:10 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: Gold Short Description: allocation manager Owners: zaniyah Branches: f13 f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: zaniyah -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #20 from Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org 2010-08-12 05:42:51 EDT --- I assume that this is the right way around? The software is called Gold Allocation Manager on its home page, and usually referred to as just 'Gold', but the RPM is called 'gold'. I have assumed from what has been said that the SCM request package name should match the software name, but please let me know if this is not the case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-08-12 05:47:34 EDT --- Ah, if the srpm name is gold, SCM request should be filed with Package Name: gold and the summary of this bugzilla should be changed to Review request: gold - short summary. At the top of this bugzilla page, you can see Bug 618761 - Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC (edit) . Click edit and change the summary of this bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #16 from Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org 2010-08-11 06:44:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) Is this package 'gold' or 'Gold'? The review bug summary says Gold, but the package spec/src.rpm is 'gold'. Can you fix the summary and re-request, or fix the package and rerequest? I don't understand what the problem is here? Many packages have names in various cases, for example, TORQUE, where the rpm is called 'torque' but the software is actually 'TORQUE'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-08-11 07:06:30 EDT --- Kevin is asking in which name you want to have this software registered on Fedora package database, and to clarify this is asking to fix either the summary of _this bugzilla's summary_ (i.e. to change the summary of this bugzilla entry to Review request: gold - Allocation Manager, or to change the package name in SCM request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #14 from Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org 2010-08-10 08:58:41 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gold Short Description: allocation manager Owners: zaniyah Branches: f13 f14 el6 InitialCC: zaniyah -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-08-10 13:58:07 EDT --- Is this package 'gold' or 'Gold'? The review bug summary says Gold, but the package spec/src.rpm is 'gold'. Can you fix the summary and re-request, or fix the package and rerequest? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-08-05 11:46:16 EDT --- Jessica, please write git request and set fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #9 from Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org 2010-07-29 03:53:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) * The LICENSE file also needs the iconv treatment Oops, was trying to be quick. * Sorry should have been %config(noreplace) not simply %config Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk 2010-07-29 05:15:46 EDT --- All blocking issues appear to have been fixed, and no further issues introduced. You should possibly add a README.Fedora file explaining how to setup the DB and get up and running, as well as an example httpd config file. In future please bump the release and add changelog entries each time you submit for reconsideration. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-07-29 05:37:18 EDT --- I guess not fedora-cvs+ but fedora-review+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #12 from Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk 2010-07-29 05:50:01 EDT --- Good point -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||trem...@tremble.org.uk AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|trem...@tremble.org.uk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761
Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk 2010-07-28 05:08:37
EDT ---
- = N/A
/ = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[/] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[/] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[/] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
[/] Versioned MODULE_COMPAT_ Requires
[-] Non-Versioned CPAN URL tag
[/] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2355956
[!] Rpmlint output:
gold.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre - per, ore, pee
gold.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timeframe - time frame,
time-frame, timeshare
gold.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gold-2.1.12.2/LICENSE
gold.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/goldg.conf
gold.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gold-2.1.12.2/README
gold.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gold.conf
gold.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/goldd.conf
gold.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gmkaccount
... Snip many similar messages ...
gold.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary glsproject
gold.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre - per, ore, pee
gold.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timeframe - time frame,
time-frame, timeshare
gold.src:96: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
gold.src:96: W: macro-in-comment %{_sysconfdir}
gold.src:98: W: macro-in-comment %{SOURCE1}
gold.src:98: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
gold.src:98: W: macro-in-comment %{_sysconfdir}
gold-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gold-2.1.12.2/LICENSE
gold-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gold-doc-2.1.12.2/README
gold-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gold-doc-2.1.12.2/LICENSE
gold-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gold-2.1.12.2/README
gold-web.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US frontend - fronted,
front end, front-end
gold-web.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gold-web-2.1.12.2/README
gold-web.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gold-web-2.1.12.2/LICENSE
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 62 warnings.
[/] Package is not relocatable.
[/] Buildroot is correct ( Not needed if = EL6 and = F13 )
Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[/] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[/] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: BSD
(http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2010-July/001338.html)
[/] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[/] With any Subpackage installed the license must also be installed (this may
belong to another subpackage)
[!] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[/] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
d2cd0943ea4d574f7c101510ad11d02d gold-2.1.12.2.tar.gz
d2cd0943ea4d574f7c101510ad11d02d SOURCES/gold-2.1.12.2.tar.gz
[/] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[/] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[/] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[/] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[!] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[/] Permissions on files are set properly.
[/] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. ( Not
needed if = EL6 and = F13 )
[/] Package consistently uses macros.
[/] Package contains code, or permissible content.
[/] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[/] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[/] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[/] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #4 from Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org 2010-07-28 05:45:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) snip [!] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. snip === COMMENTS === Only the LICENSE file should be included in all the %doc stansas. (the rest should be based on what's appropriate, normally just the main package) While the spec file is legible, it's supposed to be en_US timeframe - time frame, time-frame Is there some way to check this sort of thing (I am finding conflicting sources)? I copied the description from the website, which is in US English as far as I know. file-not-utf8 (LICENSE, README) # standard fix (preserving timestamps) iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf8 README README.utf8 touch -r README README.utf8 mv README.utf8 README Do you want me to add that to the spec file? Ignore the lack of man-page messages, upstream don't provide them and there is other documentation. non-conffile-in-etc (/etc/gold(|g|d).conf - Use the %conf macro macro-in-comment - Ignore, Okay will do. Is there a make test rule (that doesn't require a database)? If so it *should* be used. No there isn't. I already looked into this, and there isn't a make check either. I have been talking to the upstream maintainer off-list about this and other issues, so it may appear later. It's worth running a recent rpmlint over all the files before submitting, the EL-5 rpmlint is rather out of date. It would be nice if the people.fedoraproject.org servers had the koji client and rpmlint (and rpmbuild for creating SRPMs) on them. I will have to spend some time setting up a VM so that I can use it to build otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #5 from Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk 2010-07-28 05:58:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) While the spec file is legible, it's supposed to be en_US timeframe - time frame, time-frame Is there some way to check this sort of thing (I am finding conflicting sources)? I copied the description from the website, which is in US English as far as I know. I rely on RPMlint on the whole, if you've an online US dictionary contradicting this don't worry too much. file-not-utf8 (LICENSE, README) Do you want me to add that to the spec file? Yes, sorry if that wasn't clear. It's worth running a recent rpmlint over all the files before submitting, the EL-5 rpmlint is rather out of date. It would be nice if the people.fedoraproject.org servers had the koji client and rpmlint (and rpmbuild for creating SRPMs) on them. I will have to spend some time setting up a VM so that I can use it to build otherwise. rpmbuild is a deliberate omission, and koji would require your ssh private keys. Personally I think it would be useful to add rpmlint to the post build scripts in koji... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #6 from Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org 2010-07-28 06:35:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) While the spec file is legible, it's supposed to be en_US timeframe - time frame, time-frame Is there some way to check this sort of thing (I am finding conflicting sources)? I copied the description from the website, which is in US English as far as I know. I rely on RPMlint on the whole, if you've an online US dictionary contradicting this don't worry too much. I have made the changes suggested by rpmlint, although I did not change 'pre'. I'm finding all of those suggestions are fine according to the online US dictionary, but nevermind. file-not-utf8 (LICENSE, README) Do you want me to add that to the spec file? Yes, sorry if that wasn't clear. Okay, done. It's worth running a recent rpmlint over all the files before submitting, the EL-5 rpmlint is rather out of date. It would be nice if the people.fedoraproject.org servers had the koji client and rpmlint (and rpmbuild for creating SRPMs) on them. I will have to spend some time setting up a VM so that I can use it to build otherwise. rpmbuild is a deliberate omission, and koji would require your ssh private keys. Personally I think it would be useful to add rpmlint to the post build scripts in koji... True. I forget that koji uses ssh keys and not kerberos. I have updated the spec file and SRPM on my people.fedoraproject space (so same URL as before). Please could you check again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #7 from Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org 2010-07-28 06:44:25 EDT --- Sorry, as release was incremented, the SRPM changed name. SRPM: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~zaniyah/gold/gold-2.1.12.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #8 from Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk 2010-07-28 10:20:44 EDT --- * The LICENSE file also needs the iconv treatment * Sorry should have been %config(noreplace) not simply %config -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #1 from Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org 2010-07-27 13:00:24 EDT --- Gold is an open source accounting system developed by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as part of the Department of Energy (DOE) Scalable Systems Software Project (SSS). It tracks resource usage on High Performance Computers and acts much like a bank, establishing accounts in order to pre-allocate user and project resource usage over specific nodes and timeframe. Gold provides balance and usage feedback to users, managers, and system administrators. SQLite is used by default, but Gold can be configured to use either MySQL or PostgreSQL instead. There is also a web interface that provides feedback and allows management in a more 'usable' format. This and the documentation are packaged separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #2 from Jessica Jones fed...@zaniyah.org 2010-07-27 13:04:30 EDT --- I have also asked the upstream maintainer to make the changes I made via the two patches: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/2010-July/000343.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
